Al-Ubaydli, Omar and Jones, Garett and Weel, Jaap (2010): Patience, cognitive skill and coordination in the repeated stag hunt.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_27723.pdf Download (446kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Coordination games have become a critical tool of analysis in fields such as development and institutional economics. Understanding behavior in coordination games is an important step towards understanding the differing success of teams, firms and nations. This paper investigates the relationship between personal attributes (cognitive ability, risk-aversion, patience) and behavior and outcomes in coordination games, an issue that, to the best of our knowledge, has never been studied before. For the repeated coordination game that we consider, we find that: (1) cognitive ability has no bearing on any aspect of behavior or outcomes; (2) pairs of players who are more patient are more likely to coordinate well and earn higher payoffs; and (3) risk-aversion has no bearing on any aspect of behavior or outcomes. These results are robust to controlling for personality traits and demographic characteristics.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Patience, cognitive skill and coordination in the repeated stag hunt |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Coordination; IQ; personality; discount rate; patience; risk-aversion |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D23 - Organizational Behavior ; Transaction Costs ; Property Rights D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D02 - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O12 - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development |
Item ID: | 27723 |
Depositing User: | Omar Al-Ubaydli |
Date Deposited: | 29 Dec 2010 20:33 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 22:30 |
References: | Al-Ubaydli, O. (2009). “How large looms the ghost of the past? State dependence vs. heterogeneity in coordination games,” Working paper, George Mason University. Al-Ubaydli, O., G. Jones and J. Weel (2010). “How do cognitive ability and economic parameters impact upon behavior in Prisoner’s dilemmas?,” Working paper, George Mason University. Andersen, S., G. Harrison, M. Lau and E. Rutstrom (2006). “Elicitation using multiple price list formats,” Experimental Economics, 9, p383-405. Andersen, S., G. Harrison, M. Lau and E. Rutstrom (2009). “Eliciting risk and time preferences,” Econometrica, forthcoming. Andreoni, J. and C. Sprenger (2010). “Estimating time preferences from convex budgets,” Working paper, University of California at San Diego. Axelrod, R. (1984). The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books. Bardhan (2005). Scarcity, Conflicts, and Cooperation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Benjamin, D., S. Brown and J. Shapiro (2006). “Who is ‘behavioral’? Cognitive ability and anomalous preferences,” Working paper, Harvard University. Berninghaus, S. and K. Ehrhart (1998). “Time horizon and equilibrium selection in tacit coordination games: Experimental results,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 37, p231-248. Blume, A. and A. Ortmann (2007). “The effects of costless pre-play communication: experimental evidence from games with Pareto-rankable equilibria,” Journal of Economic Theory, 132, p274-290. Borghans, L., A. Duckworth, J. Heckman and B. Weel (2008). “The economics and psychology of personality traits,” Journal of Human Resources, 43, p972-1059. Brandts, J. and D. Cooper (2006). "A change would do you good: An experimental study on how to overcome coordination failure in organizations" American Economic Review, 96, p669-693. Brandts, J., D. Cooper and E. Fatas (2007). “Leadership and overcoming coordination failure with asymmetric costs”, Experimental Economics, 10, p269-284. Burks, S., J. Carpenter, L. Goette and A. Rustichin (2009). “Cognitive skills affect economic preferences, strategic behavior, and job attachment,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, p7745-7750. Camerer, C. and M. Knez (1994). “Creating expectational assets in the laboratory: Coordination in ‘weakest-link’ games,” Strategic Management Journal, 15, p101-119. Clark, G (2007). A Farewell to Alms: A Brief Economic History of the World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Cooper, R., D. DeJong, R. Forsythe and T. Ross (1992). “Communication in coordination games,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, p739-771. Cooper, R. and John, A. (1988). Cooper, Russell and Andrew John, "Coordinating Coordination Failures in Keynesian Models," Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103(3), p441-464. Croson, R. and U. Gneezy (2009). “Gender differences in preferences,” Journal of Economic Literature, 47, p1-27. Devetag, G. (2003). “Coordination and information in critical mass games: An experimental study,” Experimental Economics, 6, p53-73. Devetag, G. and A. Ortmann (2007). “When and why? A critical survey on coordination failure in the laboratory,” Experimental Economics, 10, p331-344. Dohmen, T., A. Falk, D. Huffman and U. Sunde (2010). “Are risk aversion and impatience related to cognitive ability?,” Working paper, Maastricht University. Epley, N. and T. Gilovich (2004). “Are adjustments insufficient?,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, p447-460. Frederick, S. (2005). “Cognitive reflection and decision making,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, p25-42. Fuchs, Victor R. (1982). “Time Preference and Health: An Exploratory Study.” NBER Working Paper Series, Vol. w0539. Hardin, R. (1995). One for all. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Harrison, G., M. Lau and M. Williams (2002). “Estimating individual discount rates in Denmark: A field experiment,” American Economic Review, 92, p1606-1617. Harrison, G. and E. Rutstrom (2008). “Risk aversion in the laboratory,” in J. Cox and G. Harrison (eds.), Risk Aversion in Experiments (Bingley, UK: Emerald, Research in Experimental Economics, Volume 12). Harsanyi, J. and R. Selten (1988). A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games, MIT University Press, Cambridge. Hey, J. and C. Orme (1994). “Investigating generalizations of expected utility theory using experimental data,” Econometrica, 62, p1291-1326. Holt, C. and S. Laury (2002). “Risk aversion and incentive effects,” American Economic Review, 92, p1644-1655. Jones, G. (2008). “Are smarter groups more cooperative? Evidence from prisoner’s dilemma experiments, 1959-2003,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 68(3-4), p489-497. Kandori, M., Mailath G.J. and Rob, R. (1993). “Learning, Mutation, and Long Run Equilibria in Games,” Econometrica, 61(1), p29-56 Kremer, M. (1993). “The O-Ring Theory of Economic Development,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, p551-575. Lawrance, E.C., (1991). "Poverty and the Rate of Time Preference: Evidence from Panel Data," Journal of Political Economy, vol. 99(1), p54-77. Mueller, D. (2004). Public Choice III. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Neisser, U., G. Boodoo, T. Bouchard, A. Boykin, N. Brody, S. Ceci, D. Halpern, J. Loehlin, R. Perloff, R. Sternberg and S. Urbina (1995). “Intelligence: Knows and unknowns,” American Psychologist, 51, p77-101. Rankin, F., J. Van Huyck and R. Battalio (2000). “Strategic similarity and emergent conventions: evidence from similar stag hunt games,” Games and Economic Behavior, 32, p315-337. Ray, D. (1998). Development Economics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Schelling, T. (1960). The Strategy of Conflict, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Schmidt, D., R. Shupp, J. Walker and E. Ostrom (2003). “Playing safe in coordination games: the roles of risk dominance, payoff dominance, and history of play,” Games and Economic Behavior, 42, p281-299. Skyrms, B. (2003). The Stag Hunt and the Evolution of Social Structure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Van Huyck, J., R. Battalio and R. Beil (1991). “Strategic uncertainty, equilibrium selection, and coordination failure in average opinion games,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, p885-910. Van Huyck, J., R. Battalio and R. Beil (1990). “Tacit coordination games, strategic uncertainty, and coordination failure,” American Economic Review, 80, p234-248. Warneryd, K. (1990). “Conventions: An evolutionary approach,” Constitutional Political Economy, 1(3), p83-107. Weber, R. (2006). “Managing growth to achieve efficient coordination in large groups,” American Economic Review, 96, p114-126. Weber, R., C. Camerer, Y. Rottenstreich and M. Knez (2001). “The illusion of leadership: Misattribution of cause in coordination games,” Organizational Science, 12, p582-598. Weingast, B. (1997). “The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law,” American Political Science Review, 91, p245-63. Wilcox, N. (2009). “’Stochastically more risk averse:’ A contextual theory of stochastic discrete choice under risk,” Journal of Econometrics, forthcoming. Young, H.P. (1993). “The Evolution of Conventions,” Econometrica, 61(1), p57-84. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/27723 |