Lof, Matthijs (2010): Heterogeneity in Stock Pricing: A STAR Model with Multivariate Transition Functions.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_30520.pdf Download (386kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Stock prices often diverge from measures of fundamental value, which simple present value models fail to explain. This paper tries to find causes for these long-run price movements and their persistence by estimating a STAR model for the price-earnings ratio of the S&P500 index for 1961Q1 - 2009Q3, with a transition function that depends on a wider set of exogenous or predetermined transition variables. Several economic, monetary and financial variables, as well as linear combinations of these, are found to have nonlinear effects on stock prices. A two-step estimation procedure is proposed to select the transition variables and estimate their weights. This STAR model can be interpreted as a heterogeneous agent asset pricing model that makes a distinction between chartists and fundamentalists, where the set of transition variables is included in the agents’ information set.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Heterogeneity in Stock Pricing: A STAR Model with Multivariate Transition Functions |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Heterogeneous agents, Regime switching, Stock prices, STAR models |
Subjects: | G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G12 - Asset Pricing ; Trading Volume ; Bond Interest Rates E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates > E44 - Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C22 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes |
Item ID: | 30520 |
Depositing User: | Matthijs Lof |
Date Deposited: | 02 May 2011 23:51 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 14:19 |
References: | [1] Aruoba, S.B., F.X. Diebold, F.X. and C. Scotti (2009), Real-Time Measurement of Business Conditions, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 2), pp. 417-27. [2] Becker, R. and D. Osborn (2007), Weighted smooth transition regressions. University of Manchester Economics Discussion Paper Series, 0724. [3] Bernanke, B.S. (1990), On the predictive power of interest rates and interest rate spreads, New England Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, issue Nov, 51-68. [4] Boswijk, P., C.H. Hommes and S. Manzan (2007), Behavioral Heterogeneity in Stock Prices. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 31, 1938-1970. [5] Bredin, D. and S. Hyde (2008), Regime change and the role of international markets on the stock returns of small open economies. European Financial Management, 14, 315-346. [6] Brock, W.A. and C.H. Hommes (1998), Heterogeneous beliefs and routes to chaos in a simple asset pricing model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 22, 1235-1274. [7] Campbell, J.Y. and R.J. Shiller (2001), Valuation ratios and the long-run stock market outlook: an update. NBER working paper 8221. [8] Cochrane, J.H. (2001), Asset Pricing. Princeton University Press. [9] Eitrheim, Ø. and T. Teräsvirta (1996), Testing the adequacy of smooth transition autoregressive models. Journal of Econometrics 74, 59-76. [10] Fama, E.F. and K.R. French (2001), Disappearing dividends: Changing firm characteristics or lower propensity to pay? Journal of Financial Economics 60, 3-43. [11] Godfrey, L.G. (1988), Misspecification tests in econometrics. Cambridge University Press. [12] Gordon, M., (1962), The Investment Financing and Valuation of the Corporation. Irwin. [13] Hakkio, C.S. and W.R. Keeton (2009), Financial Stress: What Is It, How Can It Be Measured, and Why Does It Matter? Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Review, Second Quarter 2009, 5-50. [14] Hommes, C.H. (2006), Heterogeneous agent models in economics and finance. In: Judd, K.J. and L. Tesfatsion (Eds.), Handbook of Computational Economics, Vol. 2: Agent- Based Computational Economics, North-Holland, pp. 1109-1186 [15] Kaliva, K. and L. Koskinen (2008), Stock market bubbles, inflation and investment risk. International Review of Financial Analysis, 17, 592-603. [16] Luukkonen, R., P. Saikkonen and T. Teräsvirta (1988), Testing linearity against smooth transition autoregressive models. Biometrika 75, 491-499. [17] Medeiros, M.C. and A. Veiga (2005), A flexible coefficient smooth transition time series model. IEEE transactions on neural networks 16, 97-113. [18] Munk, C. (2010), Financial Asset Pricing Theory. To be published. Oxford University Press. [19] Shiller, R.J. (1981), Do stock prices move too much to be justified by subsequent changes in dividends? American Economic Review 71, 421-436. [20] Shleifer, A. and R. Vishny (1997), The limits of arbitrage. Journal of finance, 52, 35-55. [21] Teräsvirta, T. (1994), Specification, estimation, and evaluation of smooth transition autoregressive models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 89, 208-218. [22] Van Dijk, D and P.H. Franses (1999), Modeling multiple regimes in the business cycle. Macroeconomic Dynamics 3, 311–340. [23] Van Norden, S. and H. Shaller (1999), Speculative behavior, regime-switching and stock market fundamentals. In: Rothman, P. (Eds.), Nonlinear Time Series Analysis of Economic and Financial Data, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 321-356. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/30520 |
Available Versions of this Item
- Heterogeneity in Stock Pricing: A STAR Model with Multivariate Transition Functions. (deposited 02 May 2011 23:51) [Currently Displayed]