Congedo, Pierluigi and ghezzi, federico (2010): I rimedi nelle operazioni di concentrazione. Disciplina e prassi comunitaria. Cenni sulla disciplina e prassi italiana. Published in: Trattato dei contratti Rescigno Gabrielli UTET Giuridica , Vol. c IX, No. volume "Contratti della concorrenza" (2010)
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_31607.pdf Download (489kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The chapter tackles the key remedies in merger operation at European and Italian level. On the basis of the 2008 Notice on remedies, the writers analyses the pros and cons of each remedy on the basis of the recurrent praxis of the European Commission and of the Italian competition authority, also with respect to appeals launched at the European or Italian administrative courts. The A. make reference to the Italian civil law contract remedies as well as to the responsibility regime try to outline the point of contact between the European legal system and the national civil law system.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | I rimedi nelle operazioni di concentrazione. Disciplina e prassi comunitaria. Cenni sulla disciplina e prassi italiana. |
English Title: | Remedies in merger operations. European discipline and practice. Reference to the Italian discipline and practice. |
Language: | Italian |
Keywords: | Remedies Remedy Merger operation concentration carve-out monitoring; trustee; divestiture; trustee; competition; concorrenza; rimedi; concentrazioni; rimedi nelle operazioni di concentrazione; dismissioni; scuola di Chicago; scuola di Harvard |
Subjects: | L - Industrial Organization > L4 - Antitrust Issues and Policies > L44 - Antitrust Policy and Public Enterprises, Nonprofit Institutions, and Professional Organizations K - Law and Economics > K2 - Regulation and Business Law K - Law and Economics > K2 - Regulation and Business Law > K21 - Antitrust Law L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L22 - Firm Organization and Market Structure L - Industrial Organization > L4 - Antitrust Issues and Policies |
Item ID: | 31585 |
Depositing User: | Pierluigi Congedo |
Date Deposited: | 18 May 2017 15:53 |
Last Modified: | 10 Oct 2019 16:25 |
References: | ALPA, Concentrazioni societarie e disciplina della concorrenza. I rimedi e i limiti alla libertà contrattuale, Riv. dir. priv., 2003, 4, 695-714; ALPA, Concentrazioni e misure ripristinatorie della concorrenza. Aspetti di diritto contrattuale, Contr., 2003, 514 ss. CONGEDO, Separazione funzionale o strutturale nelle industrie regolate? I vincitori non puniscono; possibilmente cooperano (e innovano), Conc. merc., XVI, 2008, Milano, 2009; EZRACHI, Behavioural Remedies in EC Merger Control-Scope and Limitations, 29 World Competition, 2006, 459 ss; GHEZZI, Intrecci azionari e concorrenza. Il caso Generali/ILA, Mercato concorrenza e regole, 2000, 2, 245-278; PAPANDROPOULOS e TAJANA, The merger remedies study-in divestiture we trust?, European Competition Law Review, 2006, 8, spec. par. 3.2 «Are structural remedies necessaritly the best cure?», 449 ss.; PAPON, Structural versus Behavioural Remedies in Merger Control: a case-by-case analysis, European Competition Law Review, 2009, 1, 40; RODOTA’, Il problema della responsabilità civile, Milano, 1964, 79, 127; WHISH, Substantive analysis under the EC Merger Regulation: should the dominance test be replaced by “substantial lessening of competition”?”, in EU Competition Law & Policy Developments & Priorities (Hellenic Competition Commission, 2002), 45-62; |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/31585 |