Coskun, Yener (2011): Does re-design of the policies on housing finance and supply help to solve housing question of Turkey?
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_31729.pdf Download (606kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Housing is one of the major socio-economic problems in Turkey. Widespread spontaneous settlements in urban area may be accepted as the sufficient criterion for the level of housing question in Turkey. Additionally, there are important quality problems in existing housing units. This problematic structure may be also explained by the lack of efficient housing policies and housing finance system. It seems after 2003 that housing policy of Turkey is essentially based on the Housing Development Administration‟s (HDA) pragmatic approaches. In this context, we may argue that the current housing policy is one-dimensional and also would be unsustainable in some perspectives. In this experimental research, the author attempts to analyze limitations and clear/potential problems of the housing policies of HDA. We basically analyze whether affordable housing problem is minimize with alternative policies and required incentives. In this context, we review housing subsidies and PPPs as the instruments of alternative social/private rental housing supply models. In a broader perspective, the original contribution of this paper is to examine private rental housing, social rental housing, urban renewal, micro-finance and housing production of REITs as the alternative housing supply/finance models to improve affordable housing. We conclude that these alternative housing supply/finance models may improve housing affordability and hence minimize the housing question in Turkey, if they can optimally design and required incentives may meet by the central/local governments.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Does re-design of the policies on housing finance and supply help to solve housing question of Turkey? |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Housing finance, affordable housing, Turkish housing policies, TOKI (Housing Development Administration) |
Subjects: | R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R3 - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location > R31 - Housing Supply and Markets R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R3 - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location > R38 - Government Policy |
Item ID: | 31729 |
Depositing User: | yener coşkun |
Date Deposited: | 21 Jun 2011 14:13 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 20:47 |
References: | REFERENCES Akın, Ç. 2009. Essays in Global Linkages and Business Cycles. PhD Dissertation. Columbian College of Arts and Sciences. The George Washington University. Available at: http://gradworks. umi.com/33/60/3360049.html (01.04.2011). Akkar, Z.M. 2006. Kentsel Dönüșüm Üzerine Batı’daki Kavramlar, Tanımlar, Süreçler ve Türkiye. Planlama Dergisi 2: 29-38. Altınok, E. 2006. Yasadışı Yapılaşan Alanlarda Dönüştürme Kapasitelerinin Tükenişi ve Kentsel Yoksulluk: Çeliktepe Örneği. Yüsek Lisans tezi. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi. Apgar, W. 2004. Rethinking Rental Housing: Expanding the Ability of Rental Housing to Serve as a Pathway to Economic and Social Opportunity. W04-11. December. Joint Center for Housing Studies, Harvard University. Ataöv, A. and Osmay, S. 2007. Türkiye’de Kentsel Dönüşüme Yöntemsel bir Yaklaşım. METU JFA 2007/2 24 (2) 57-82. Atterhög, M. 2005. Dissertation Summary. Doctoral Thesis. Building and Real Estate Economics Department of Infrastructure Royal Institute of Technology (KTH). Stockholm. Available at: kth.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:7257/FULLTEX T01 (22.01.2011). Atterhög, M. and Song, H.S. 2005. The effect of Competition and Ownership Policies on the Housing Market. Doctoral Thesis (in the, Policies to increase access to home ownership for low-income households, Essay VI). Building and Real Estate Economics Department of Infrastructure Royal Institute of Technology (KTH). Stockholm. Available at: kth.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:7257 /FULLTEX T01 (22.01.2011). Austin, P.M. 2009. The Affordable Housing: Enabling Territorial Authorities Act 2008 – When Policy Transfer Fails. Housing Finance Intenational (September): 14-17. Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency (BRSA). 2009. Financial Markets Report. December. Available at: http://www.bddk.org.tr /websitesi/english/Reports/Financial_Markets_Report/8127 FMR_Dec_2009.pdf (26.04.2011). Barker, K. 2004. Review of Housing Supply: Delivering Stability: Securing our Future Housing Needs: Final Report –Recommendations. London: HMSO. Bayraktar, E. 2007. Bir İnsanlık Hakkı Konut: TOKİ’nin Planlı Kentleşme ve Konut Üretim Seferberliği. 1. Baskı. Boyut Yayıncılık, İstanbul. Bayraktar, E. 2008. Speech on Real Estate Summit 8. 04-05.06.2010. Summit Book: pp 7-11. GYODER. Available at: http://www.gyoder.org.tr/PDFs/Publishings/Summit2008.pdf (11.04.2011). Baytın, Ç. 2000. Dwelling in Turkey’s 50 Year of Modern Urbanization Period: Sample Istanbul. Working Paper. ENHR 2000 Conference, Gavle 26-30 June, Sweden. Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey. 2010. Financial Stability Report. May Volume 10. Available at: http://www.tcmb.gov.tr/yeni/eng/index.html (11.04.2011). Coşkun, Y. (2010). An Analysis of the Opportunities and Weaknesses of the Turkish Real Estate Market. 17 th Annual ERES Conference. 23-26.06.2010. Milano/ITALY. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1641211 Coşkun, Y. (2011). The Global Financial Crisis and the Turkish Housing Market: Is There a Success Story?. Housing Finance International 25 (3): 6-14. Dursun, P. and Ekmekçi, T.O. 2010. Mapping Urban Transformation via New Housing Projects in the City of Istanbul. 22nd International Housing Research Conference 4-7 July, ISTANBUL. ENHR. Available at: http://enhr2010.com/fileadmin/templates/ENHR2010_papers_ web/papers_web/WS05 /WS05_537_Dursun.pdf (08.02.2011). Erman, T. 2010. Kent, Konut ve Taşıdığı Anlamlar: Bağlamlandırılmış (contextualized) Bir Yaklaşım. TMMOB Mimarlar Odası Ankara Şubesi. Eylül. Dosya: 6-12. Erol, A. 2007. Toplu Konut İdaresi Başkanlığı’na Devredilen Arsa ve Arazilerin Hukuk ve Anayasa Karşısındaki Ddurumu. Nisan. Yaklaşım Dergisi, 235-239. European Mortgage Federation. (2007). Hypostat 2006: A Review of Europe’s Mortgage and Housing Markets. November. EMF Publication. Available at: http://www.hypo.org/Objects/6/Files/Hypostat %202006%20-%20Web%20Version.pdf (14.04.2010). Eurostat. 2010. Eurostat Yearbook 2010. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Gökşin, A. and Müderrisoğlu, B. 2005. Urban Regeneration: a Comprehensive Strategy for Creating Spaces for Innovative Economies. Urban Regeneration: A Comprehensive Strategy. 41st ISoCaRP Congress, İstanbul. Hoek-Smit, M.C. 2009. Housing Finance Subsidies. (in the “Housing Finance Policy in Emerging Markets”, Eds.: Chiquier, L. and Lea, M., The World Bank, Washington D.C), 417-459. Housing Department of Turkey. 2003. Türkiye Konut Sahipliği Çalışması.Şubat. APK Daire Başkanlığı. Available at: http://www.konut.gov.tr/html/raporveekleri/tksa.doc. Erişim Tarihi: 14.05.2008. Housing Development Administration (HDA). 2010a. HDA: Agency Profile 2010-2011. Available at http://www.toki.gov.tr/docs/yayinlar/TOKI'11_TRK.pdf (12.04.2011). Housing Development Administration (HDA). 2010b. HDA: Agency Profile 2010-2011. Available at http://www.toki.gov.tr/docs/yayinlar/TOKI'11_ENG.pdf (12.04.2011). Ince, E.K. 2006. Kentsel Dönüşümde Yeni Politika, Yasa ve Eğilimlerin Değerlendirilmesi Kuzey Ankara Girişi (Protokol Yolu) kentsel dönüşüm projesi. Temmuz. Yüksek Lisasn Tezi. Şehir ve Bölge Planlama. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.Gazi Üniversitesi. Karasu, M. A. 2009. Devletin Değişim Sürecinde Belediyelerin Konut Politikalarında Farklılaşan Rolü. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 14 (3):245-264. Keleş, R. 2006. Kentleşme Politikası. 10. Baskı. İmge Kitabevi. Ankara. Keyder, Ç. 2005. Globalisation and Social Exclusion in Istanbul. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 29 (1): 124-134. Kostof, S. 1999. The City Assembled: The Elements of Urban Form Through History. First North American Paperback Edition. Hong Kong: Thames&Hudson Ltd. Köroğlu, B.A. and Ercoşkun, Ö.Y. 2006. Urban Transformation: a Case Study on 7 Çukurambar, Ankara. G.U. Journal of Science 19 (3): 173-183. Krueckeberg, D.A. 1999. The Grapes of Rent: A History of Renting in a Country of Owners. Housing Policy Debate 10 (1): 9-30. Kuyucu, T. and Ünsal, Ö. 2010. Urban Transformation as State-Led Property Transfer: An Analysis of Two Cases of Urban Renewal in Istanbul. Urban Studies 47 (7): 1479-99. Available at: http://periferiesurbanes.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/article-tuna-1.pdf (01.02.2011). Lawson, J., Berry, M., Milligan, V. and Yates, J. 2009. Housing – Towards an Australian Model. Housing Finance International (September): 18-26. Lea, Michael. 2009. Structure and Evolution of Housing Finance System. (in Housing Finance Policy in Emerging Markets, Eds.: Chiquier, L. and Lea, M., The World Bank, Washington D.C.: 29-47. LeBlanc, D. 2009. Residential Rental Housing Finance. (in the “Housing Finance Policy in Emerging Markets”, Eds.: Chiquier, L. and Lea, M., The World Bank, Washington D.C), 363-394. Oğuz, S.C. 2003. The Use and Efficiency of Housing Stock in Turkey. MsC Thesis. The Middle East Technical University. Ortega, E., Rubio, M. and C. Thomas. 2011. House Purchase Versus Rental in Spain. Documentos de Trabajo N.º 1108. Banco De Espana. Available at: http://www.bde.es/webbde/SES/Secciones/ Publicaciones/PublicacionesSeriadas/DocumentosTrabajo/11/Fich/dt1108e.pdf (15.04.2011). Oncu, A. 1988. The Politics of the Urban Land Market in Turkey: 1950-1980. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 12: 38-63. Ozcan, P. 2005. A Critique of Housing Classes Approach: The Case of Şentepe. MsC Thesis. January. The Middle East Technical University. Ozden, P.P. 2008. Kentsel Yenileme. Ankara: Imge Kitabevi Yayınları. Reidin. 2010. IndexFocus. 15.12.2010. Reidin.2011. Reidin-Gyoder Yeni Konut Fiyat Endeksleri. 31.01.2011. Schmidt, S. and Budinich, V. 2006. Housing the Poor by Engaging the Private and Citizen Sectors: Social Innovations and Hybrid Value Chains. World Urban Forum, Vancouver, Canada. Available at: http://www.globalurban.org/GUDMag08Vol4Iss2/SchmidtBudinich.htm (22.02.2011). Schmitz, A. and Brett, D.L. 2007. Real Estate Market Analysis: A Case Study Approach. Fifth Edition. Urban Land Institute. Serrano, L.D. 2006. Housing Satisfaction, Homeownership and Housing Mobility: A Panel Data Analysis for Twelve EU Countries. Discussion Paper No. 2318. The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). State Audit Institution (SAI, Devlet Denetleme Kurulu). Toplu Konut İdaresi Başkanlığı’nın 2002, 2003 ve 2004 yılları eylem ve işlemlerinin araştırılıp denetlenmesine ilişkin rapor özeti. Devlet Denetleme Kurulu. Sayı: 2004/7. Available at: http://www.cankaya.gov.tr/tr_html/DDK/ tkonut.htm (21.05.2008). State Planning Organizations (SPO). 2000. Eighth Development Plan. Available at: http://ekutup.dpt.gov.tr/plan/viii/plan8i.pdf (21.04.2011). State Planning Organizations (SPO). 2001. Eighth Development Plan Housing Specialized Commission Report. DPT: 2594-ÖİK: 606. Available at: www.dpt.gov.tr (20.10.2010). State Planning Organizations (SPO). 2004. Eighth Development Plan, Annual Plan of 2004. Available at: www.dpt.gov.tr (21.04.2011). State Planning Organizations (SPO). 2006. Ninth Development Plan. Available at: http://ekutup.dpt.gov.tr/plan/viii/plan9i.pdf (26.04.2011). Struyk, R. 2009. A guide to Preparing a Housing Finance Strategy: An Overview. Housing Finance International (September): 11-13. Tanrıvermiş, H. and Aliefendioğlu, Y. 2008. Yapı Değerlemesinin Teorik Esasları ve Uygulamaları: Türkiye'de kamulaştırma, Emlak vergisi ve imar düzenlemeleri yönünden bir inceleme. Üçüncü Sektör Kooperatifçilik 43(4): 30-60. Tekeli, İ. 1983. Türkiye’nin konut politikaları üzerine. Sayo 100+1, Mart, Arredemento Mimarlık: 70-73 (İçinde, Tekeli, İ. 2010. Konut Sorununu Konut Sunum Biçimleriyle Düşünmek. Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları.İlhan Tekeli Toplu Eserler 13. Birinci Basım. İstanbul: 221-228). Tekeli, İ. 1987. Konut sorunu üzerine düşünceler, Birleşmiş Milletler Türk Derneği 1987 Yıllığı (Konut Özel Sayısı), Ankara: 45-58 (İçinde, Tekeli, İ. 2010. Konut Sorununu Konut Sunum Biçimleriyle Düşünmek. Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları.İlhan Tekeli Toplu Eserler 13. Birinci Basım. İstanbul: 93-106). The Ministry of Public Works and Settlement. 2009. Kentleşme Şurası 2009. Kentsel Dönüşüm, Konut ve Arsa Politikaları Komisyonu Raporu. Nisan. Ankara. Available at: http://www.bayindirlik.gov.tr/ turkce/kentlesme/kitap3.pdf (13.01.2011). The Ministry of Public Works and Settlement. 2010. Integrated Urban Development Strategy and Action Plan 2010-2023. Available at: http://www.bayindirlik.gov.tr/turkce/dosya/kentges.pdf (17.01.2011). The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM). 2006. Affordability and the Supply of Housing. 20 June. Third Report of Session 2005–06. Volume I. (http://www.odpm.gov.uk). Turan, M. 2009. Türkiye’de kentsel rant devlet mülkiyetinden özel mülkiyete. 1. Baskı. Tan Kitabevi: Ankara. Turkish Statistical Institute (TurkStat). 2001. Building Census 2000. TÜİK. Available at: http://www.tuik.gov.tr/Kitap.do? metod=KitapDetay&KT _ID=9&KITAP_ID=64 (29.03.2011). Turkish Statistical Institute (TurkStat). 2010a. Statistical Indicators 1923-2009. December. Available at: http://www.tuik.gov.tr (29.03.2011). Turkish Statistical Institute (TurkStat). 2010b. Turkey’s Statistical Yearbook 2009. May. Available at: http://www.tuik.gov.tr (29.03.2011). Turkish Statistical Institute (TurkStat). 2010c. Household Budget Survey Consumption Expenditures 2007. August. Available at: http://www.tuik.gov.tr (16.04.2011). Türk, Ş.Ş. and Altes, W.K.K. 2009. Applicability of Land Readjustment Method in Urban Renewal: An Examination of Three Cases in Turkey. Planning, Finance and Urban Readjustment. FIG Working Week 2009. Surveyors Key Role in Accelerated Development. Eilat, Israel, 3-8 May, 2009. Available at: https://www.fig.net/pub/fig2009/papers/ts03d/ts03d_turk_korthalsaltes_3263.pdf (03.04.2011). Türk, Ş.Ş. and Altes, W.K.K. 2010a. The Planning System and Land Provision for Social Housing in Turkey. Housing Finance International (Autumn): 26-32. Türk, Ş.Ş. and Altes, W.K.K 2010b. Institutional Capacities in the Land Development for Housing on Greenfield Sites in Istanbul. Habitat International 34 (2010) 183–195. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). 2008. Guidebook on Promoting Good Governance in Public-Private Partnership. New York and Geneva. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). 2009. Self-Made Cities. ECE/HBP/155. Geneva. Switzerland. United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat). 2003. Rental Housing. Nairobi. UNECE (United Nations Economic Commission for Europe), WPLA (Working Party on Land Administration) and REM (Real Estate Market Advisory Group). 2010. Policy Framework for Sustainable Real Estate Market. United Nations. Geneva. Switzerland. Warnock, V.C., Warnock, F.E. 2008. Markets and Housing Finance, Journal of Housing Economics. doi:10.1016/j.jhe.2008.03.001 (22.04.2011). Whitehead, C.M.E. 2007. Planning Policies and Affordable Housing: England as a Successful Case Study. Housing Studies 22 (1): 25-44. Whitehead, C.M.E. and Scanlon, K. (Eds.). 2007. Social Housing in Europe. July. London School of Economics and Political Science. London. Available at: http://www2.lse.ac.uk/geography AndEnvironment/research/London/pdf/SocialHousingInEurope.pdf (01.03.2011). Yates, J. and Whitehead, C.M.E. 2001. Introduction to the Focus Issue.Housing Studies 16 (2):141-146. Yirmibeşoğlu, F. 2008. The Spatial Distribution Process of Real Estate Agencies and Housing Market in Istanbul (Emlak komisyoncularının mekânsal dağılım süreci ve İstanbul’da konut piyasası). İtü Dergisi/a Mimarlık, Planlama ve Tasarım 7 (2): 128-140. Zhu, H. 2006. The Structure of Housing Finance Markets and House Prices in Asia. BIS Quarterly Review (December): 55-69. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/31729 |