Scelte e razionalità nei modelli economici: un'analisi multidisciplinare

Schilirò, Daniele and Graziano, Mario (2011): Scelte e razionalità nei modelli economici: un'analisi multidisciplinare.

Abstract

This paper argues critically the issue of choices and rationality in economic models through a multidisciplinary analysis. First, the analysis aims at highlight the scientific contributions of psychology in economics, since psychology and the related approach of cognitive economics has made more complex and problematic the analysis of choices of the standard neoclassical economics. The cognitive approach in economics has pointed out the complexity of the choice process and the unsolved relationship between economic and psychological dimensions of such a process, showing the biases and the limits of rationality. Second, the analysis focuses on the use of evolutionary concepts in economic theory. Economic models, which are consistent with an evolutionary approach, have necessarily to be very different from those of standard economics. In particular, this paper examines the works of Alfred Marshall, since he is the first major economist to refer explicitly to biology for explaining economic evolution. The purpose of the analysis is to reveal the conditions required to succeed in building a real evolutionary model. A major condition, which is found in Marshall models, particularly in his Principles of Economics, is the understanding and the integration of darwinian philosophical matrix in his general economic approach. The paper, therefore, aims at demonstrating that economics has not been historically a discipline homogenously aligned to a single, undifferentiated form of thought, locked into the idea of perfect rationality, but that is a discipline that enriched and still enriches itself by contributions and contaminations from other disciplines.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Choices and rationality in economic models: a multidisciplinary analysis
• Language: Italian
• Keywords: scelta; razionalità; economia cognitiva; modelli evolutivi; biologia
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D03 - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B52 - Institutional ; Evolutionary; D - Microeconomics > D9 - Intertemporal Choice > D90 - General; D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D01 - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles

References

Ainslie G., 1991. Intertemporal choice. Derivation of “rational” economic behavior from hyperbolic discount curves, American Economic Review 81 (2): 334-340, May.

Akerlof G.A., 1991. Procrastination and Obedience, American Economic Review, 81 (2): 1-19,May.

Allais M., 1953. Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: critique des postulats et axiomes de l’école américaine, Econometrica, 21: 503-546.

Arrow K.J., 1971. Essay in the theory of risk-bearing, Amsterdam, North Holland Pub.Co.

Arrow K.J., 1982. Risk perception in pscycology and economics, Economic Inquiry, 20: 1-9.

Bergson H., 1996. L’évolution créatrice, Paris, PUF.

Bruner J.S., Potter M.C., 1964. Interference in visual recognition, Science, 144: 424-425, April.

Cournot A., 1838. Recherches sur les principes mathematiques de la theorie des richesses, Paris, L.Hachette.

Cyert, R. M., Simon H.A., Trow D.B., 1956. Observation of a business decision, Journal of Business, 29 (4): 237-48.

Darwin C., 1967. L’origine della specie, Torino, Bollati Boringhieri.

Dobzhansky T., 1973. Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution, The American Biology Teacher, 35: 125-129.

Ellsberg, D., 1961. Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75 (4): 643–669.

Friedman M., Savage L., 1948. Utility analysis of choices involving risk, Journal of Political Economy, 56 (4) : 279-304.

Galavotti M.C., Scazzieri R., Suppes P., (eds.), 2008. Reasoning, rationality and probability,Stanford, CSLI Publications.

Gilovich T., Vallone R., Tversky A., 1985. The hot hand in basketball: on the misperception of random sequences, Cognitive Psychology, 17 (3): 295-314, July.

Hogdson T., 1993. Economics and evolution, bringing life back into economics, Cambridge, Polity Press.

Jacob F., 1980. La logique du vivant, une histoire de l’hérédité, Paris, Gallimard.

Kahneman D., 2002. Maps of bounded rationality: a perspective on intuitive judgment and choice, Nobel Lecture, Princeton.

Kahneman D., Thaler R.H., 2006. Anomalies: Utility Maximization and Experienced Utility, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20 (1): 221-234.

Kahneman D., Tversky A., 1979. Prospect theory. An analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica, 47 (2) : 263-292.

Kahneman D., Tversky A., 1984. Choices, values and frames, American Psychologist, 39: 341-350.

Kahneman D., Knetsch J.L., Thaler R.H., 1990. Experimental tests oft he endowment effect and the Coase theorem, Journal of Politica Economy, 98 (6): 1325-1348.

Keren G., 1987. Facing uncertainty in the game of bridge a calibration study, Organizational behaviour and human decision processes, 39 (1): 98-114, February.

Keynes J.M., 1924. Alfred Marshall, 1842-1924, Economic Journal, 34: 311-372, September;trad.it. in A. Quadrio Curzio, R. Scazzieri (a cura di), Protagonisti del pensiero economico. Nascita ed affermazione del marginalismo (1871-1890) 1977, 221-285, Bologna, Il Mulino.

Laibson D., 1997. Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112 (2) : 443-477.

Marshall A., 1890. Principles of Economics, London, Macmillan and Co.

Marshall, A., 1919, 1920 (3rd edition). Industry and Trade, London, Macmillan & Co.

Marshall A., 1991. Analogies mécaniques et biologiques en économie, Revue Française d’Economie, 6 (1): 103-113.

Mathiot J., 1998. Evolution, sélection, information. La question de la convergence, Philosophiques, Département de philosophie de l’UQAM.

Mayr E., 1982. Storia del pensiero biologico. Diversità, evoluzione, eredità. Torino, Bollati Boringhieri.

Mazur, J. E., 1987. An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In M. L. Commons, J. E. Mazur, J. A. Nevin, & H. Rachlin (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior: V. The effect of delay and of intervening events on reinforcement value, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum: 55-73.

Mazur, J. E., 1988. Estimation of indifference points with an adjusting delay procedure. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49 (1): 37–47.

Ménard C.L., 1979. Equilibre, déséquilibre, temps : un peu d’histoire, Economie Appliquée, 32 (2-3): 229-251.

Montague R., 2008. Perchè l’hai fatto? Come prendiamo le nostre decisioni, Milano, Raffaello Cortina.

Montesano A., 2005. La nozione di razionalità in economia, Rivista italiana degli economisti, n.1.

Motterlini M., Guala F. (a cura di ), 2005. Economia cognitiva e sperimentale, Milano, Egea.

Novarese M., Castellani M., Di Giovinazzo V., 2009. Procedural rationality and happiness, MPRA Paper, n.18290, October. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/18290/

Pievani T., 2005. Introduzione alla filosofia della biologia, Bari-Roma, Laterza.

Rabin M., 1998. Psychology and economics, Journal of Economic Literature, 36(1): 11-46.

Robbins L.C., 1932. 1935 (2nd edition). An essay on the nature and significance of economic science, London, Macmillan.

Samuelson P. 1937. A note on measurement of utility, Review of Economic Studies, 4: 155-61.

Schilirò D., 2011. Decisioni e razionalità in economia, MPRA Paper n.29477. March. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/29477/

Schumpeter J. A., 1954. History of economic analysis, New York, Oxford University Press, trad.it. Storia dell’analisi economica, Torino, Bollati Boringhieri, 1990.

Shane F., Loewnstein G., O‘Donoghue T., 2002. Time discounting and time preference. A critical review, Journal of Economic Literature, XL (2) : 351-401.

Simon H. A., 1955. A behavioral model of rational choice, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69 (1): 99-118.

Simon H. A., 1978, Rational decision-making in business organizations. Nobel Memorial Lecture, 8 December 1978, Economic Sciences: 343-371, http://nobelprize.org.

Simon H. A., 1987. Rationality in psychology and economics, in Hogarth, R.M., Reder, R.W.(Eds.), Rational choice. Chicago, University of Chicago Press: 25-40.

Simon H. A., 2000. Bounded rationality in social science: today and tomorrow. Mind & Society, 1:25-39.

Smith Vernon L., 1982. Microeconomic system as an experimental science, American Economic Review, 72: 923-955.

Smith V., 2000. Bargaining and market behavior: essays in experimental economics, Cambridge,Cambridge University Press.

Strotz, R. H., 1955-1956. Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. Review of Economic Studies, 23 (3): 165-80.

Thaler R.H., 1980. Towards a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1: 39-60.

Thaler R.H., 1981. Some Empirical Evidence on Dynamic Inconsistency,” Economic Letters, 8:201-207.

Tversky A., Kahneman D., 1974. Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases, Science, 185:1124-31, September.

Tversky A., Kahneman D., 1986. Rational choice and the framing of decisions, Journal of Business, 59 (4) Part 2: S251-S278.