Lanzafame, Matteo (2011): The balance of payments constrained growth rate and the natural rate of growth: new empirical evidence.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_33461.pdf Download (161kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper implements a panel approach to investigate the empirical relevance of ‘Thirlwall’s Law’, which states that long-run growth must be consistent with balance of payments (BOP) equilibrium and is, thus, determined on the demand side. Building on ARDL modelling, mean-group and pooled mean-group estimation methods, we use annual data over the 1960-2010 years for a panel of 22 OECD countries and find significant support for the ‘Law’. Next, we also explore empirically the hypothesis that the BOP-constrained growth rate (yb) must equal the natural (or potential) rate of growth (yn) and find that the data do not reject this hypothesis. Finally, we adopt a new approach, based on panel Granger-causality methods, to explore the direction of causality between yb and yn. The results indicate the existence of unidirectional long-run causality from yb to yn , thus reinforcing the view, embodied in the ‘Law’, that long-run growth is demand-determined and constrained by the BOP.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The balance of payments constrained growth rate and the natural rate of growth: new empirical evidence |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Balance of payments; endogenous growth; panel cointegration; pooled mean-group estimation; panel Granger-causality |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C23 - Panel Data Models ; Spatio-temporal Models O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O57 - Comparative Studies of Countries O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O40 - General F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance > F43 - Economic Growth of Open Economies |
Item ID: | 33461 |
Depositing User: | Matteo Lanzafame |
Date Deposited: | 16 Sep 2011 18:58 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 20:32 |
References: | Alonso, J.A. 1999. Growth and the external constraint: lessons from the Spanish case, Applied Economics, vol. 2, 245-253 Arellano, M. and Bond, S. 1991. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 58, 277–297 Attanasio, O.P., Picci, L. and Scorcu, A.E. 2000. Saving, growth, and investment: a macroeconomic analysis using a panel of countries, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 82, 182–211 Bagnai, A. 2010. Structural changes, cointegration and the empirics of Thirlwall’s Law, Applied Economics, vol. 42, 1315-1329 Bairam, E. 1993. Static versus dynamic specifications and the Harrod foreign trade multiplier, Applied Economics, vol. 25, 739-742 Blundell, R. and Bond, S. 1998. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models, Journal of Econometrics, vol. 87, 115-143 Bruno, G.S.F. 2005. Approximating the bias of the LSDV estimator for dynamic unbalanced panel data models, Economics Letters, vol. 87, 361-365 Dray, M. and Thirlwall, A.P. 2011. The endogeneity of the natural rate of growth for a selection of Asian countries, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, vol. 33, 451-468 Granger, C.W.J. 1969. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods, Econometrica, vol. 37, 424–438 Gutierrez, L. 2003. One the power of panel cointegration tests: a Monte Carlo comparison, Economics Letters, vol. 80, 105-111 Hartwig, J. 2010. Is health capital formation good for long-term economic growth? – Panel Granger-causality evidence for OECD countries, Journal of Macroeconomics, vol. 32, 314-325 Holtz-Eakin, D., Newey, W. and Rosen, H.S. 1988. Estimating vector autoregressions with panel data, Econometrica, vol. 56, 1371–1395 Judson, R.A. and Owen A.L. 1999. Estimating dynamic panel data models: a guide for macroeconomists, Economics Letters, vol. 65, 9-15 Karlsson, S. and Löthgren, M. 2000. On the power and interpretation of panel unit root tests, Economics Letters, vol. 66, 249-255 Kim, B-H., Min, H-G., Hwang, Y-S. and McDonald, J.A. 2009. Are Asian countries’ current accounts sustainable? Deficits, even when associated with high investment, are not costless, Journal of Policy Modeling, vol. 31, 163-179 Kiviet, J.F. 1995. On bias, inconsistency, and efficiency of various estimators in dynamic panel data models, Journal of Econometrics, vol. 68, 53–78 Kiviet, J.F. 1999. Expectation of expansions for estimators in a dynamic panel data model: some results for weakly exogenous regressors, in Hsiao, C., Lahiri, K., Lee, L.-F. and Pesaran, M.H. (eds), Analysis of Panel Data and Limited Dependent Variables, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press Kónya, L. 2006. Exports and growth: Granger-causality analysis on OECD countries with a panel data approach, Economic Modelling, vol. 23, 978–992 Lanzafame, M. 2009. Is regional growth in Italy endogenous?, Regional Studies, vol. 43, 1001-1013 Lanzafame, M. 2010. The endogeneity of the natural rate of growth in the regions of Italy, International Review of Applied Economics, vol. 24, 533-552 León-Ledesma, M. and Lanzafame, M. 2010. The endogenous nature of the 'natural' rate of growth, in Setterfield, M. (eds), Handbook of Alternative Theories of Economic Growth, Northampton, USA, Edward Elgar León-Ledesma, M. and Thirlwall, A.P. 2002. The endogeneity of the natural rate of growth, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 26, 441-459 Libânio, G.A. 2009. Aggregate demand and the endogeneity of the natural rate of growth: evidence from Latin American economies, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 33, 967-984 Loayza, N. and Ranciere, R. 2006. Financial development, financial fragility and growth, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, vol. 38, 1051-1076 Martínez-Zarzoso, I. and Bengochea-Morancho, A. 2004. Pooled mean group estimation of an environmental Kuznets curve for CO2, Economics Letters, vol. 82, 121-126 McCombie, J.S.L. 1989. Thirlwall’s Law and balance of payments constrained growth – A comment on the debate, Applied Economics, vol. 21, 611-629 McCombie, J.S.L. and Thirlwall, A.P. 2004. Essays on balance of payments constrained growth. Theory and evidence, London, Routledge McGregor, P. and Swales, K. 1985. Professor Thirlwall and balance of payments constrained growth, Applied Economics, vol. 17, 17-32 Nair-Reichert, U. And Weinhold, D. 2001. Causality tests for cross-country panels: a new look at FDI and economic growth in developing countries, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, vol. 63, 153–171 Ng, S. and Perron, P. 1995. Unit root tests in ARMA models with data-dependent methods for the selection for the truncation lag, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 90, 268-281 Nickell, S. 1981. Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects, Econometrica, vol. 49, 1417–1426 Palley, T. 2003. Pitfalls in the theory of growth: an application to the balance of payments constrained growth model, Review of Political Economy, vol. 15, 75-84 Pedroni, P. 1999. Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, vol. 61, 653-660 Pedroni, P. 2001. Purchasing power parity tests in cointegrated panels, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 83, 727-731 Pedroni, P. 2004. Panel cointegration: Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis, Econometric Theory, vol. 20, 597-625 Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y. and Smith, R. 1997. Estimating long-run relationships in dynamic heterogeneous panels, DAE Working Papers Amalgamated Series 9721 Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y. and Smith, R. 1999. Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 94, 621-634 Pesaran, M.H. and Smith, R. 1995. Estimating Long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels, Journal of Econometrics, vol. 68, 79–113 Setterfield, M. 2006. Thirlwall’s Law and Palley’s pitfalls: a reconsideration, in Arestis, P., McCombie, J.S.L. and Vickerman, R. (eds), Growth and Economic Development: Essays in Honour of A.P.Thirlwall, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Thirlwall, A.P. 1979. The balance of payments constraint as an explanation of international growth rate differences, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, vol. 128, 45-53 Vogel, L. 2009. The endogeneity of the natural rate of growth – an empirical study for Latin American countries, International Review of Applied Economics, vol. 23, 41-53 Westerlund, J. 2007. Testing for error correction in panel data, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, vol. 69, 709-748 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/33461 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
The balance of payments constrained growth rate and the natural rate of growth: new empirical evidence. (deposited 14 Sep 2011 11:14)
- The balance of payments constrained growth rate and the natural rate of growth: new empirical evidence. (deposited 16 Sep 2011 18:58) [Currently Displayed]