The two sides of envy

Gershman, Boris (2011): The two sides of envy.

Abstract

The two sides of envy, destructive and competitive, give rise to qualitatively different equilibria, depending on the economic, institutional, and cultural environment. If inequality is high, property rights are poorly protected, and social comparisons are strong, society is likely to be in the "fear equilibrium," in which better endowed agents restrain their efforts to prevent destructive envy of the relatively poor. In the opposite case, the standard "keeping up with the Joneses" competition arises, and individuals satisfy their positional concerns through suboptimally high efforts. The different nature of these equilibria leads to strikingly contrasting effects of envy on economic performance. From a welfare perspective, the adoption of better institutions that move the economy away from the low-output fear equilibrium may not be Pareto improving since it aggravates the negative consumption externality. In a dynamic setting, envy-avoidance behavior, dictated by the destructive side of envy, reduces inequality and paves the way to emulation, driven by its competitive side. The paper provides a foundation for understanding the evolving role of envy in the process of development.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Envy; Fear of envy; Inequality; Property rights; Relative standing
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution > D31 - Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D62 - Externalities; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O43 - Institutions and Growth; D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D74 - Conflict ; Conflict Resolution ; Alliances ; Revolutions; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O10 - General; Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z13 - Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology ; Social and Economic Stratification

References

Banerjee, Abhijit, "Envy," in Bhaskar Dutta, Shubhashis Gangopadhyay, Debraj Ray, and Dilip Mookherjee, eds., Economic Theory and Policy: Essays in Honour of Dipak Banerjee, New York: Oxford University Press, 1990, pp. 91-111.

Barnett, Richard C., Joydeep Bhattacharya, and Helle Bunzel, "Choosing to Keep up with the Joneses and Income Inequality," Economic Theory, December 2010, 45 (3), 469-496.

Belk, Russell W., "Marketing and Envy," in Richard H. Smith, ed., Envy: Theory and Research, Oxford University Press, 2008, chapter 12, pp. 211-226.

Benhabib, Jess, Alberto Bisin, and Matthew Jackson, eds, Handbook of Social Economics, Vol. 1, Elsevier, 2011.

Boskin, Michael J. and Eytan Sheshinski, "Optimal Redistributive Taxation when Individual Welfare Depends upon Relative Income," Quarterly Journal of Economics, November 1978, 92 (4), 589-601.

Bowles, Samuel and Yongjin Park, "Emulation, Inequality, and Work Hours: Was Thorsten Veblen Right?," Economic Journal, November 2005, 115 (507), F397-F412.

Cancian, Frank, Economics and Prestige in a Maya Community, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1965.

Carroll, Christopher D., Jody R. Overland, and David N. Weil, "Comparison Utility in a Growth Model," Journal of Economic Growth, December 1997, 2 (4), 339-367.

Clanton, Gordon, "Jealousy and Envy," in Jan E. Stets and Jonathan H. Turner, eds., Handbook of the Sociology of Emotions, Berlin: Springer, 2006, chapter 18, pp. 410-442.

Clark, Andrew E. and Claudia Senik, "Who Compares to Whom? The Anatomy of Income Comparisons in Europe," Economic Journal, May 2010, 120, 573-594.

Clark, Andrew E., Paul Frijters, and Michael Shields, "Relative Income, Happiness and Utility: An Explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and Other Puzzles," Journal of Economic Literature, June 2008, 46 (1), 95-144.

Clark, Anrew E. and Andrew J. Oswald, "Comparison-Concave Utility and Following Behaviour in Social and Economic Settings," Journal of Public Economics, October 1998, 70 (1), 133-155.

D'Arms, Justin and Alison Duncan Kerr, "Envy in the Philosophical Tradition," in Richard H. Smith, ed., Envy: Theory and Research, Oxford University Press, 2008, chapter 3, pp. 39-59.

Demsetz, Harold, "Toward a Theory of Property Rights," American Economic Review, May 1967, 57 (2), 347-359.

Dow, James, "The Image of Limited Production: Envy and the Domestic Mode of Production in Peasant Society," Human Organization, Winter 1981, 40 (4), 360-363.

Elster, Jon, "Envy in Social Life," in Richard J. Zeckhauser, ed., Strategy and Choice, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991, chapter 3, pp. 49-82. Falk, Armin and Markus Knell, "Choosing the Joneses: Endogenous Goals and Reference Standards," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, October 2004, 106 (3), 417-435.

Fernandez de la Mora, Gonzalo, Egalitarian Envy. The Political Foundations of Social Justice, New York: Paragon House Publishers, 1987.

Fernandez, Raquel, "Does Culture Matter?," in Jess Benhabib, Alberto Bisin, and Matthew Jackson, eds., Handbook of Social Economics, Vol. 1, Elsevier, 2011, chapter 11, pp. 481-510.

Fliessbach, K., B. Weber, P. Trautner, T. Dohmen, U. Sunde, C.E. Elger, and A. Falk, "Social Comparison Aects Reward-Related Brain Activity in the Human Ventral Striatum," Science, 2007, 318 (5854), 1305-1308.

Foster, George, "The Anatomy of Envy: A Study in Symbolic Behavior," Current Anthropology, April 1972, 13 (2), 165-202.

Foster, George, Tzintzuntzan: Mexican Peasants in a Changing World, New York: Elsevier, 1979.

Frank, Robert H., "The Demand for Unobservable and Other Nonpositional Goods," American Economic Review, March 1985, 75 (1), 101-116.

Frank, Robert H., Falling Behind: How Rising Inequality Harms the Middle Class, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007.

Frank, Robert H., and Ori Heffetz, "Preferences for Status: Evidence and Economic Implications," in Jess Benhabib, Alberto Bisin, and Matthew Jackson, eds., Handbook of Social Economics, New York: Elsevier, 2011, chapter 3.

Gershman, Boris, "The Economic Origins of the Evil Eye Belief," 2011. Working Paper, Brown University.

Gershman, Boris, "From Fear to Competition: Envy in the Process of Development," 2011. Working Paper, Brown University.

Graham, Carol, Happiness Around the World. The Paradox of Happy Peasants and Miserable Millionaires, Oxford University Press, 2010.

Grossman, Herschel I., and Minseong Kim, "Swords or Plowshares? A Theory of the Security of Claims to Property," Journal of Political Economy, December 1995, 103 (6), 1275-88.

Grossman, Herschel I. and Minseong Kim, "Predation and Production," in Michelle R. Garfinkel and Stergios Skaperdas, eds., The Political Economy of Conflict and Appropriation, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1996, chapter 4, pp. 57-72.

Hopkins, Ed, "Inequality, Happiness and Relative Concerns: What Actually Is Their Relationship?," Journal of Economic Inequality, December 2008, 6 (4), 351-372.

Hopkins, Ed, and Tatiana Kornienko, "Running to Keep in the Same Place: Consumer Choice as a Game of Status," American Economic Review, September 2004, 94 (4), 1085-1107.

Knell, Markus, "Social Comparisons, Inequality, and Growth," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, December 1999, 155 (4), 664-695.

Ljungqvist, Lars, and Harald Uhlig, "Tax Policy and Aggregate Demand Management under Catching Up with the Joneses," American Economic Review, June 2000, 90 (3), 356-366.

Luttmer, Erzo F., "Neighbors as Negatives: Relative Earnings and Well-Being," Quarterly Journal of Economics, August 2005, 120 (3), 963-1002.

Matt, Susan J., Keeping Up with the Joneses: Envy in American Consumer Society, 1890-1930, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2003.

Mitsopoulos, Michael, "Envy, Institutions and Growth," Bulletin of Economic Research, July 2009, 61 (3), 201-222.

Mui, Vai-Lam, "The Economics of Envy," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, May 1995, 26 (3), 311-336.

Neumark, David and Andrew Postlewaite, "Relative Income Concerns and the Rise in Married Women's Employment," Journal of Public Economics, October 1998, 70 (1), 157-183.

Oswald, Andrew J., \Altruism, Jealousy and the Theory of Optimal Non-linear Taxation," Journal of Public Economics, February 1983, 20 (1), 77-87.

Platteau, Jean-Philippe, Institutions, Social Norms, and Economic Development, Harwood Academic Publishers, 2000.

Robson, Arthur J. and Larry Samuelson, "The Evolutionary Foundations of Preferences," in Jess Benhabib, Alberto Bisin, and Matthew Jackson, eds., Handbook of Social Economics, New York: Elsevier, 2011, chapter 4.

Rustichini, Aldo, "Dominance and Competition," Journal of the European Economic Association, April-May 2008, 6 (2{3), 647-656.

Schoeck, Helmut, Envy: A Theory of Social Behavior, New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World, 1969.

Schor, Juliet B., The Overworked American: The Unexpected Decline of Leisure, New York: Basic Books, 1991.

Scott, James C., The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1976.

Smith, Richard H. and Sung H. Kim, "Comprehending Envy," Psychological Bulletin, January 2007, 133 (1), 46-64.

Solnick, Sara J. and David Hemenway, "Are Positional Concerns Stronger in Some Domains than in Others?," American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, May 2005, 95 (2), 147-151.

van de Ven, Niels, Marcel Zeelenberg, and Rik Pieters, "Leveling Up and Down: The Experiences of Benign and Malicious Envy," Emotion, June 2009, 9 (3), 419-429.

Veblen, Thorstein B., "Some Neglected Points in the Theory of Socialism," Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, November 1891, 2 (3), 57-74.

Wolf, Eric R., "Types of Latin American Peasantry: A Preliminary Discussion," American Anthropologist, June 1955, 57 (3, Part 1), 452-471.

Zizzo, Daniel J., "Money Burning and Rank Egalitarianism with Random Dictators," Economics Letters, November 2003, 81 (2), 263-266.

Zizzo, Daniel J., "The Cognitive and Behavioral Economics of Envy," in Richard H. Smith, ed., Envy: Theory and Research, Oxford University Press, 2008, chapter 11, pp. 190-210.