Methodological shortcomings in estimating Armington elasticities

Cassoni, Adriana and Flores, Manuel (2008): Methodological shortcomings in estimating Armington elasticities.

Abstract

CGEMs are one of the most potentially powerful tools for simulating policies. However, a major restriction they face is them needing a huge number of parameters that are not always available, and even at times impossible to obtain. When CGEMs are applied to trade, Armington elasticities of substitution are one of those key sets. The common practice among CGEMs builders has been to impose these values, either at will or by using those stemming from other existing research. There is general consensus, however, that econometrically estimated parameters for each case study would substantially improve the robustness of results. Unfortunately, most of the so obtained elasticities are considered underestimates of both the real and theoretically expected parameters. This gave rise to a growing concern on the eventual role played by methodological and empirical issues in this matter. There are some findings that have generated a quite general consensus among researchers, related to the type of datasets used; the disaggregation levels at which goods are defined and the origins of imported varieties are considered; the frequency of data; among others.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Armington elasticity; CGEM; methodology
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B40 - General; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F17 - Trade Forecasting and Simulation; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F14 - Empirical Studies of Trade

References

Alaouze C. M. (1977). “Estimates of the elasticity of substitution between imported and domestically produced goods classified at the input-output level of aggregation”. IMPACT Project Working Paper, No. 0-13, Melbourne.

Alaouze C. M., J. S. Marsden y J. Zeitsch (1977). “Estimates of the elasticity of substitution between imported and domestically produced commodities at the four digit ASIC level”. IMPACT Project Working Paper, No. 0-11, Melbourne.

Armington P. S. (1969). “A theory for demand for products distinguished by place of production”. IMF Staff Papers, Vol. 16(1): 159-178.

Athukorala P., J. Riedel J. (1994). “Demand and Supply Factors in the Determination of NIE: A Simultaneous Error-Correction Model for Hong Kong: A Comment” The Economic Journal 178 (November 94), 1411–1413.

Bilgic, A., S. King, A. Lusby and D.F. Schreiner. (2002). “Estimates of U.S. Regional Commodity Trade Elasticities of Substitution.” Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy. 32(2):31-50.

Blonigen B. A. and W. W. Wilson (1999). “Explaining Armington: what determines substitutability between home and foreign goods?”, Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. 32, No.1.

Corado C. and J. de Melo (1983). “An ex-ante model for estimating the impact on trade flows of a country's accession to a customs union”. World Bank. Discussion Paper No. DRD67.

Erkel-Rousse H. and D. Mirza (2002). “Import Price-Elasticities: Reconsidering the Evidence”, Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol.35, No.2, pp. 282-306.

Flores M. (2008). Elasticidades de Armington. Discusión teórico-metodológica y estimaciones para Uruguay. Monographic work, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y de Administración, Universidad de la República.

Fontes O. A., H. Kume, and A. C. de Souza Pedroso (2007). “Elasticidades de Armington para o Brasil – 1986-2002”. RBE v. 61 n. 2, p. 245–267.

Gallaway M. P., C. A. McDaniel and S. A. Rivera (2003). “Short-run and long-run industry-level estimates of U.S. Armington elasticities”. North American Journal of Economics and Finance 14, pp. 49-68.

Gan J. (2006). “Substitutability between US domestic and imported forest products: The Armington approach”. Forest Science, 52(1).

Gibson, K.L.(2003). “Armington Elasticities for South Africa: Long- and Short-Run Industry Level Estimates,” Working Paper 12-2003, Trade and Industrial Policy Strategies, Johannesburg.

González M., and S. Wong (2004). Elasticidades de Sustitución de Importaciones para Ecuador. Revista Tecnológica No.1 Vol.18 (2005).

Granger C. W. J. (1981). “Some properties of time series data and their use in econometric model specification”. Journal of Econometrics 16, 121—130.

Granger C. W. and J., Newbold P. (1974). “Spurious regressions in econometrics”. Journal of Econometrics, 2, 111-120.

Grunfeld Y., and Z. Griliches (1960). “Is aggregation necessarily bad”. Review of Economics and Statistics 42(1):1-13

Helpman E. and P. Krugman (1985). Market Structure and Foreign Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Hernández G., (1998). "Elasticidades de sustitución de las importaciones para la Economía Colombiana," Revista de Economía del Rosario, Universidad del Rosario – Facultad de Economía.

Hertel T. W. (1999). “Applied general equilibrium analyisi of agricultural and resource policies”. Staff Paper 99-2, Dept. of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University.

Hertel T. W., E. Ianchovichina and B. J. McDonald (1997). “Multi-Region General Equilibrium Modeling”. En J. F. François y K. A. Reinert (Eds.), Applied Methods for Trade Policy Analysis. A Handbook, Cap. 9. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hertel T. W., D. Hummels, M. Ivanic, and R. Keeney (2004). “How confident can we be in CGE-based assessments of free trade agreements?”. NBER Working Paper No. 10477. Cambridge Massachusetts. Hummels D. (1999). “Toward a Geography of Trade Costs”, GTAP Working Paper, No.17.

Ivanova N. (2005). “Estimation of own and cross-price elasticities of disaggregated importe and domestig goods in Russia”. Economics Education and Research Consortium Working Paper, No. 05/13.

Kapuscinski C. A., and P. G. Warr (1999). "Estimation of Armington Elasticities: An Application to the Philippines," Departmental Working Papers 1996-08, Australian National University, Economics RSPAS.

Krugman P. (1995). “Increasing returns, imperfect competition and the positive theory of international trade”. En G. Grossman y K. Rogoff (Ed.), Handbook of International Economics, Vol. 3. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Le Roux Burrows (1999). “Armington Elasticities for the South African Mining and Manufacturing Sectors”, Paper delivered at the Biennial Conference of the Economic Society of South Africa at the University of Pretoria.

López E., and E. Pagoulatos (2002). “Estimates and Determinants of Armington Elasticities for the U.S. Food Industry”. Journal of Industry, Competition & Trade, Vol. 2, No. 3, p247-59, setiembre.

Lozano C. (2004). “Elasticidades de sustitución Armington para Colombia”. Archivos de Economía No. 271. Dirección de Estudios Económicos, Departamento Nacional de Planeación, República de Colombia.

MacKinnon, J.G. (1991): "Critical Values for Cointegration Tests ". In R. F. Engle and C.W.J. Granger (eds.), Long-run Economic Relationships: Readings in Cointegration (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 267-276.

McDaniel C. A. and E. J. Balistreri (2003). “A discussion on Armington trade substitution elasticities”. U.S. International Trade Commission. Working Paper No. 2002-01-A, enero.

McKitrick R. R. (1998). “The Econometric Critique of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling: The Role of Parameter Estimation”. Economic Modeling 15: 543-573.

Pesaran (2003). “Aggregation of linear dynamic models: an application to life-cycle consumption models under habit formation”. Economic Modelling, 20, 2, 227-435.

Reinert K. A. and D. W. Roland-Holst (1992). “Armington elasticities for United States manufacturing sectors”, Journal of Policy Modelling, No. 14, pp. 631-639.

Reinert K. A. and C. R. Shiells (1991). Estimated elasticities of substitution for analysis of a North American Free Trade Area, U. S. International Trade Commission, Washington D. C.

Riedel J. (1988). The Demand for LDC Exports of Manufactures: Estimates from Hong Kong, The Economic Journal 98 (March 88), 138–148.

Ruhl K. J. (2003). “Solving the Elasticity Puzzle in International Economics”, Job Market Papers, University of Minnesota and Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.

Rodrik D. (1997). Has globalisation gone too far? Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC. Saito, M. (2004). “Armington Elasticities in Intermediate Inputs Trade: A Problem in Using Multilateral Trade Data”. WP/04/22, FMI.

Shiells C. R. and K. A. Reinert (1993). “Armington models and the terms-of-trade effects: Some econometric evidence for North America”. Canadian Journal of Economics, No. 26, pp. 299-316.

Shiells C. R., R. M. Stern and A. V. Deardorff (1986) “Estimates of the elasticities of substitution between imports and home goods for the United States”, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, No. 122, pp. 497-519.

Stern R.M., J. F. and B. Schumacher (1976) Price Elasticities in International Trade, Trade Policy Research Centre, London: The MacMillan Press Ltd).

Theil, H. (1954). Linear Aggregation of Economic Relations. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.

Warr P. (2005). “The transmission of import prices to domestic prices: An application to Indonesia”. Applied Economics Letters.

Welsch H. (2006). "Armington elasticities and induced intra-industry specialization: The case of France, 1970-1997," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 556-567, May.