Women's participation in high performance work practices: a comparative analysis of Portugal and Spain

Ferreira, Pedro and Porto, Nelida and Portela, Marta (2010): Women's participation in high performance work practices: a comparative analysis of Portugal and Spain.

Abstract

High-performance work systems (HPWS) can be seen as a set of new forms of work organization combined with flexible human resources (HR) practices that enhance organizational performance through employee involvement and empowerment. Although in the past two decades much research has been conducted on the effects that high-performance work practices can have on organizations, there is still much to know about the ideal conditions for the adoption of such practices. According to some research, there are organizational and employees’ determinants that can influence the adoption of high-performance work practices. On the other hand, gender, as an employee characteristic has not been much considered. However, according to the literature, female employees may be less likely to participate in HPWS (Heywood & Jirjahn, 2002). Women tend to have a greater need for flexible working conditions, such as part-time jobs or flexibility between work and home. This can lead to shorter tenure and less complex tasks, but also to more individualized job functions, which mean that workers with these kind of profile have less probability of making part of teams, a fundamental feature of HPWS. The main goal of this paper is to understand how employees’ characteristics can influence the adoption of high-performance work practices. Specifically, it will be given special attention to gender as a potential determinant of participation in HPWS. To accomplish this goal, we frame the debate in recent research on HPWS that include employees’ characteristics and then follow to an analysis of Portugal and Spain, using data from the European Working Conditions Survey (EWCS).

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Work organization; high-performance work practices; gender; Portugal; Spain
• Subjects: L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L23 - Organization of Production; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M5 - Personnel Economics > M54 - Labor Management; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M1 - Business Administration > M12 - Personnel Management ; Executives; Executive Compensation; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J16 - Economics of Gender ; Non-labor Discrimination

References

Appelbaum, E. & Batt, R. (1994). The new American workplace. Ithaca, New York: ILR Press Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P., and Kalleberg, A. (2000) Manufacturing Advantage: Why highperformance work systems pay off, Ithaca: ILR Press

Atkinson, C. & Hall, L. (2009) The Role of Gender in Varying Forms of Flexible Working, Gender, Work & Organization, 16: 6, pp. 650-666

Barling, J.; Kelloway, E.K.; Iverson, R.D. (2003) High-Quality Work, Job Satisfaction, and Occupational Injuries, Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 2, pp. 276-283

Barnard, M.E. & Rodgers, R.A. (2000) How are internally oriented HRM policies related to highperformance work practices? Evidence from Singapore, International Journal of Human Resources Management, 11: 6, pp. 1017-1046

Becker, G. & Huselid, M. A. (1998). 'High performance work systems and work performance: a synthesis of research and managerial implications". In G. Eerris (ed.). Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management. Vol. 16. Stamford. Conn.: JAI Press, pp. 53-101

Beltrán-Martín, I.; Roca-Puig, V.; Escrig-Tena, A.; Bou-Llusar, J.C. (2008) Human Resource Flexibility as a Mediating Variable Between High Performance Work Systems and Performance, Journal of Management, Vol. 34 No. 5, 1009-1044

Berg, P., Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T. and Kalleberg, A. (1996) The performance effects of modular production in the apparel industry. Industrial Relations, 35, pp. 356–74

Boxall, P., & Macky, K. (2007) High-performance work systems and organisational performance: bridging theory and practice, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 45:3, pp. 261-270

Boxall, P., and Macky, K. (2009) Research and theory on high-performance work systems: progressing the high involvement stream. Human Resource Management Journal, 19: 1, pp. 3-23

Brewer, A.M. (2002) Work Design for Flexible Work Scheduling: Barriers and Gender Implications, Gender, Work & Organization, 7: 1, pp. 33-44

Cappelli, P., and and Neumark, D. (2001) Do ‘high-performance’ work practices improve establishment level outcomes?’ Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 54, pp. 737–76

Crompton (1999) Eveline, J. & Todd, P. (2008) Gender Mainstreaming: The Answer to the Gender Pay Gap?, Gender, Work & Organization, 16: 5, pp. 536-558

Ferreira, P. Neira, I. & Vieira, E. (2010) The influence of human capital of the workforce in the adoption of high-performance work systems: the case of Portugal and Spain, XIX Jornadas de la Asociación de Economía de la Educación, Zaragoza, Spain, 8-9 July 2010

Forth, J. & Millward, N. (2004) High-Involvement Management and Pay in Britain, Industrial Relations, 43: 1, pp. 98-119

Godard, J. (2001) Beyond the high-performance paradigm? An analysis of managerial perceptions of reform program effectiveness. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 38, pp. 25–52

Godard, J. (2004) A critical assessment of the high-performance paradigm. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 42:2, pp. 349–378

Gollan, P. (2005) High involvement management and human resource sustainability: The challenges and opportunities. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources 43: 1, pp. 18–33

Guerrero, S. & Barraud-Didier, V. (2004) High-involvement practices and performance of French firms, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15:8, pp. 1408-1423

Guest, D., Michie, J., Conway, N. and Sheehan, M. (2003) Human resource management and corporate performance in the UK. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 41, pp. 291–314

Guthrie, J.P., Spell, C.S., and Nyamori, R.O. (2002) Correlates and consequences of high involvement work practices: the role of competitive strategy, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13: 1, pp. 183–197

Handel, M.J. & Gittleman, M. (2004) Is There a Wage Payoff to Innovative Work Practices?, Industrial Relations, 43: 1, pp. 67-97

Harley, B. (2002) Employee responses to high-performance work system practices: an analysis of the AWIRS95 data, Journal of Industrial Relations, 44: 3, pp. 418-434

Harley, B., Allen, B.C., & Sargent, L.D. (2007) High performance work Systems and Employee Experience of Work in the Service Sector: the case of aged care. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 45: 3, pp. 607-633

Heywood, J. & Jirjahn, U. (2002) Payment Schemes and Gender in Germany, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 56: 1, pp. 44–64

Heywood, Jirjahn & Tsertsvadze (2005) Getting along with Colleagues – Does Profit Sharing Help or Hurt?, KYKLOS, 58: 4, pp. 557-573

Ichniowski, C.; Kochan, T.; Levine, D.; Olson, O.; Strauss, G. (1996) What works at work. Industrial Relations, 35, pp. 299–333

Jirjahn & Stephan (2002) Gender, Piece Rates and Wages: Evidence from Matched Employer-Employee Data, Working Paper

Kauhanen, A. (2009) The Incidence of High-Performance Work Systems: Evidence from a Nationally Representative Employee Survey, Economic and Industrial Democracy, 30: 3, pp. 454-480

Kintana, M.L.; Alonso, A.U. & Olaverri, C.G. (2006) High-performance work systems and firms' operational performance: the moderating role of technology, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17:1, pp. 70-85

Lawler, E. (1986) High-Involvement Management, New Jersey, Jossey-Bass

Lawler, E. (2005) Creating high performance organisations. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 43: 1, pp. 10–17

Lindbeck, A. & Snower, D. J. (2000). “Multi-task learning and the reorganization of work: from tayloristic to holistic organization”, Journal of Labour Economics, 18: 3, pp. 353-376

Macky, K. & Boxall, P. (2008) High-involvement work processes, work intensification and employee well-being: a study of New Zealand worker experiences. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 46(1), pp. 38–55

Mkamwa, T.F. (2009) The Impact of High Performance Work Systems in Irish Companies: An Examination of Company and Employee Outcomes, Dublin City University Business School, PhD Thesis

Pil, E. K, and MacDuffie. J. P. (1996), The adoption of high-involvement work practices. Industrial Relations. 35, pp. 423-55

Ramsay, H, Scholarios, D., and Harley, B. (2000) Employees and High-Performance Work Systems: Testing inside the Black Box. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 38: 4, pp. 501-531

Tomer, J.F. (2001) Understanding high-performance work systems: the joint contribution of economics and human resource management, Journal of Socio-Economics, 30, pp. 63-73

Vandenberg, R., Richardson, H, and Eastman, L. (1999) The impact of high involvement work processes on organisational effectiveness: a second-order latent variable approach. Group Organisation Management, 24: 3, pp. 300-339

Walton, R.A. (1985) From control to commitment in the workplace. Harvard Business Review, 63: 2, pp. 77-84

Wood, S. (1999) Getting the measure of the transformed high-performance organisation. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 37: 3, pp. 391-417

Zatzick, C. D., & Iverson, R. D. (2006) High involvement management and workforce reduction: competitive advantage or disadvantage?, Academy of Management Journal, 49:5, pp. 999-1015