The effects of state budget cuts on employment and income

Clemens, Jeffrey and Miran, Stephen (2010): The effects of state budget cuts on employment and income.

Abstract

Balanced budget requirements lead to substantial pro-cyclicality in state government spending outside of safety-net programs. At the beginnings of recessions, states tend to experience unexpected deficits. While all states ultimately pay these deficits down, differences in the stringency of their balanced budget requirements dictate the pace at which they adjust. States with strict rules enact large rescissions to their budgets during the years in which adverse shocks occur; states with weak rules make up the difference during the following years. We use this variation to identify the impact of mid-year budget cuts on state income and employment. Our baseline estimates imply i) a state-spending multiplier of 1.7 and ii) that avoiding $25,000 in mid-year cuts preserves one job. These cuts are associated with shifts in the timing of government expenditures rather than differences in total spending over the course of the business cycle. Consequently, our results are informative about the potential gains from smoothing the path of state government spending. They imply that states could reduce the amplitude of business-cycle fluctuations by 15% if they completely smoothed their capital spending and service provision outside of safety-net programs.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Fiscal Policy, Government Spending Multiplier, State Government Budgets, Fiscal Institutions
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C51 - Model Construction and Estimation; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E32 - Business Fluctuations ; Cycles; H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H72 - State and Local Budget and Expenditures

References

Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. 1987. “Fiscal Discipline in the Federal System: National Reform and the Experience of the States.” Report number A-107.

Auerbach, Alan and William Gale. 2009. “Activist Fiscal Policy to Stabilize Economic Activity.” In Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City: Financial Stability and Macroeconomic Policy, pp. 327-374.

Bartik, Timothy. 1991. Who Benefits from State and Local Development Policies? Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.

Blanchard, Olivier and Lawrence Katz. 1992. “Regional evolutions.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity.

Bohn, Henning and Robert Inman. 1996. “Balanced budget rules and public deficits: evidence from the US states.” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 45. North Holland: Elsevier.

Chauvin, Kyle, David Laibson and Johanna Mollerstrom. 2009. “Asset Bubbles and the Cost of Economic Fluctuations.” Harvard mimeo.

Cogan, John, Tobias Kwick, John Taylor and Volker Wieland. 2009. “New Keynesian vs. Old Keynesian Government Spending Multipliers.” Working paper, 2009.

Fortin, Nicole. 2006. “Higher education policy and the college wage premium: cross-state evidence from the 1990s.” American Economic Review.

General Accounting Office. 1993. “Balanced Budget Requirements: State Experiences and Implications for the Federal Government.” Report number AFMD-93-58BR.

Government Accountability Office. 2009. “Recovery Act: Funds Continue to Provide Fiscal Relief to States and Localities, While Accountability and Reporting Challenges Need to Be Fully Addressed.” GAO-09-1016.

Gramlich, Edward. 1987. “Subnational fiscal policy.” In John Quigley, ed. Perspectives on Local Public Finance, vol. 3. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Inman, Robert. 1998. “Do balance budget rules work? US experience and possible lessons for the EMU.” NBER Working paper # 5838.

Knight, Bryan and Arik Levinson. 2000. “Fiscal Institutions in U.S. States” in Institutions, Politics, and Fiscal Policy. Ed. by Rolf R. Strauch and Jurgen von Hagen. Kluwer Academic Publishers. 167-187.

Krol, Robert and Shirley Svorny. 2007. “Budget Rules and State Business Cycles.” Public Finance Review 35(4): 530-44.

Krussel, Per, Toshihiko Mukoyama, Aysegul Sahin and Anthony A. Smith Jr. 2009. “Revisiting the Welfare Effects of Eliminating Business Cycles.” Review of Economic Dynamics 12(3): 393-404.

Levinson, Arik. 1998. “Balanced Budgets and Business Cycles: Evidence from the States.” National Tax Journal 51(3): 715-732.

Levinson, Arik. 2007. “Budget Rules and Business Cycles: A Comment.” Public Finance Review 35(4): 545-549.

Lowry, Robert and James Alt. 2001. “A Visible Hand? Bond Markets, Political Parties, Balanced Budget Laws, and State Government Debt.” Economics and Politics 13(1): 49-72.

Lucas, Robert. 1987. “Models of Business Cycles.” Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Mountford, Andrew and Howard Uhlig. 2009. “What are the effects of fiscal policy shocks.” NBER working paper #14551.

National Association of State Budget Officers. Various Years. “Fiscal Survey of the States.”

Poterba, James. 1994. “State responses to fiscal crises: the effects of budgetary institutions and politics.” Journal of Political Economy 102(4). Chicago: University of Chicago press.

Poterba, James. 1997. “Do budget rules work?” In Fiscal Policy, ed. Alan Auerbach. Cambrige, MA: MIT Press.

Poterba, James and Kim Rueben. 2001 “Fiscal news, state budget rules, and tax-exempt bond yields.” Journal of Urban Economics 50.

Ramey, Valerie. 2009. “Identifying government spending shocks: it’s all in the timing.” UCSD Dept. of Economics Working paper.

Stock, James, and Motohiro Yogo. 2002. “Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression.” NBER Technical Working Paper 284.