Liu, Xiaochun (2011): Modeling the time-varying skewness via decomposition for out-of-sample forecast.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_41248.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper models time-varying skewness for financial return dynamics. We decompose nancial returns into the product of the absolute returns and signs, so-called the intriguing decomposition. The joint distribution between the decomposed components is modeled through a copula function with marginals. Allowing the copula dependence parameter time-varying, we estimate the dynamic nonlinear dependence between absolute returns and signs, which governs time- varying skewness for out-of-sample forecast of financial returns. The empirical results in this paper show that the proposed models with dynamic dependence obtain better gains of out-of-sample fore- cast, and suggest the robust strategy for a risk-averse investor in response to the market timing. This paper also explores the sources of the forecasting performance via a recently developed econometric pin-down approach. Beyond the pure statistical sense, we find that the forecasts of time-varying skewness trace closely to NBER-dated business-cycle phases.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Modeling the time-varying skewness via decomposition for out-of-sample forecast |
English Title: | Modeling The Time-Varying Skewness via Decomposition For Out-of-Sample Forecast |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Time-varying skewness, Dynamic nonlinear dependence, Copulas, Out-of-sample forecast, Sources of forecasting performance |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C53 - Forecasting and Prediction Methods ; Simulation Methods G - Financial Economics > G0 - General > G00 - General |
Item ID: | 41248 |
Depositing User: | Xiaochun Liu |
Date Deposited: | 13 Sep 2012 05:58 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 04:31 |
References: | [1] Amisano, G., and R. Giacomini (2007) Comparing Density Forecasts via Weighted Likelihood Ratio Tests. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 25(2): 177-190 [2] Anatolyev, S. (2009) Dynamic Modeling Under Linear Exponential Loss. Economic Modelling 26: 8289 [3] Anatolyev, S., and N. Gospodinov (2010) Modeling Financial Return Dynamics via Decomposition. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 28(2): 232-245 [4] Barndor-Nielsen, O. E., and N. Shephard (2004) Power and Bipower Variation With Stochastic Volatility and Jumps (with discussion). Journal of Financial Econometrics 2: 148. [5] Barndor-Nielsen, O. E., and N. Shephard (2006) Econometrics of Testing for Jumps in Financial Economics Using Bipower Variation. Journal of Financial Econometrics 4(1): 1-30 [6] Barndor-Nielsen, O. E., and N. Shephard (2007). Variation, jumps and high frequency data in nancial econometrics. In: Blundell, R., Torsten, P. Newey, W. K., eds. Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications, Ninth World Congress. Econometric Society Monograph, Cambridge University Press. [7] Brownlees, C.T., F. Cipollini, and G.M. Gallo (2011) Multiplicative Error Models. Working Paper [8] Busetti, F., and A. Harvey (2011) When is a Copula Constant? A Test for Changing Relationships. Journal of Financial Econometrics 9(1): 106-131 [9] Campbell, J. Y., and S. B. Thompson (2008) Predicting Excess Stock Returns Out of Sample: Can Anything Beat the Historical Average? Review of Financial Studies 21: 15091531 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/41248 |