Experimental Evidence on Valuation and Learning with Multiple Priors

Qiu, Jianying and Weitzel, Utz (2013): Experimental Evidence on Valuation and Learning with Multiple Priors.

Abstract

Abstract Popular models for decision making under ambiguity assume that people use not one but multiple priors. This paper is a first attempt to experimentally elicit multiple priors. In an ambiguous scenario with two underlying states we measure a subject’s single prior, her other potential priors (multiple priors), her confidence in these priors valuation of an ambiguous asset with the same underlying states. We also investigate subjects' updating of (multiple) priors after receiving signals about the true states. We find that single priors are best understood as a confidence-weighted average of multiple priors. Single priors also predict the valuation of ambiguous assets best, while both the minimum and maximum of subjects' multiple priors add explanatory power. This provides some but no exclusive support for the maxmin (Gilboa and Schmeidler, 1989) and the alpha maxmin model (Ghirardato et al., 2004). With regard to updating of priors, we do not observe strong deviations from Bayesian learning, although subjects overadjust/underadjust their priors and their confidence in multiple priors after a contradictory/confirming signal. Subjects also react to neutral information with more confidence in their priors. This holds under ambiguity, but not in a comparison treatment under risk.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: ambiguity, uncertainty, risk, multiple priors, Bayesian updating, first-order beliefs, second-order beliefs
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D46 - Value Theory; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D83 - Search ; Learning ; Information and Knowledge ; Communication ; Belief ; Unawareness; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior

References

Bossaerts, P., Ghirardato, P., Guarnaschelli, S., and Zame, W. R. (2010). Ambiguity in asset markets: Theory and experiment. Review of Financial Studies, 23(4):1325-1359.

Brier, G. (1950). Verication of forecasts expressed in terms of probability. Monthly Weather Review, 78:1-3.

Doya, K., Ishii, S., Pouget, A., and Rao, R. (2007). Bayesian Brain - Probabilistic Approaches to Neural Coding. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75(4):643-669.

Epstein, L. G., Noor, J., and Sandroni, A. (2010). Non-bayesian learning. The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, 10(1):3.

Epstein, L. G. and Schneider, M. (2003). Recursive multiple-priors. Journal of Economic Theory, 113(1):1-31.

Epstein, L. G. and Schneider, M. (2007). Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Review of Economic Studies, 74:1275-1303.

Epstein, L. G. and Schneider, M. (2008). Ambiguity, information quality, and asset pricing. Journal of Finance, 63(1):197-228.

Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10(2):171-178.

Friston, K. (2003). Learning and inference in the brain. Neural Networks, 16(9):1325-1352.

Friston, K. (2005). A theory of cortical responses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 360(1456):815-836.

Ghirardato, P., Maccheroni, F., and Marinacci, M. (2004). Differentiating ambiguity and ambiguity attitude. Journal of Economic Theory, 118(2):133-173.

Gilboa, I. and Schmeidler, D. (1989). Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 18(2):141-153.

Greiner, B. (2004). An Online Recruiting System for Economic Experiments. In: Kremer, K., Macho, V. (eds.), Forschung und wissenschaftliches Rechnen 2003. GWDG Bericht 63, Goettingen, Gesellschaft fuer wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung: 79-93.

Guidolin, M. and Rinaldi, F. (2010). A simple model of trading and pricing risky assets under ambiguity: any lessons for policy-makers? Applied Financial Economics, 20(1-2):105-135.

Hey, J., Lotito, G., and Maoletti, A. (2010). The descriptive and predictive adequacy of theories of decision making under uncertainty/ambiguity. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 41(2):81-111.

Illeditsch, P. K. (2011). Ambiguous information, portfolio inertia, and excess volatility. Journal of Finance, 66(6):2213-2247.

Klibano, P., Marinacci, M., and Mukerji, S. (2005). A smooth model of decision making under ambiguity. Econometrica, 73(6):1849-1892.

Marinacci, M. (2002). Learning from ambiguous urns. Statistical Papers, 43:145-151.

Nau, R. F. (2006). Uncertainty aversion with second-order utilities and probabilities. Management Science, 52(1):136-145.

Offerman, T., Sonnemans, J., Kuilen, G. V. D., and Wakker, P. P. (2009). A truth serum for non-bayesians: Correcting proper scoring rules for risk attitudes. Review of Economic Studies, 76(4):1461-1489.

Prelec, D. (2004). A bayesian truth serum for subjective data. Science, 306(5695):462-466.

Qiu, J. and Steiger, E.-M. (2011). Understanding the two components of risk attitudes: An experimental analysis. Management Science, 57(1):193-199.

Routledge, B. and Zin, S. (2009). Model uncertainty and liquidity. Review of Economic Dynamics, 12(4):543-566. Seo, K. (2009). Ambiguity and second-order belief. Econometrica, 77(5):1575-1605.

Trautmann, S. and Kuilen, G. v. d. (2011). Belief elicitation: A horse race among truth serums. Discussion Paper 2011-117, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.

Wakker, P. (2004). On the composition of risk preference and belief. Psychogical Review, 111:236-241.