Testing for Differences across Genders: A Replication of Ultimatum Game at International Islamic University, Islamabad

HASAN, HAMID and EJAZ, NAUMAN (2013): Testing for Differences across Genders: A Replication of Ultimatum Game at International Islamic University, Islamabad.

Abstract

The paper attempts to test the following hypotheses: (i) Are people generally self interested, (ii) If people tend to be generous, what is the motive, i.e., either they fear rejection or do they have a preference for fairness, and (iii) Is there any behavioral difference in bargaining between males and females. In this respect, we conduct an ultimatum bargaining experiment in a “same gender pairings” setting in International Islamic University Islamabad, Pakistan. In order to test the first hypothesis we look at the overall offers made by the proposers and the rejection rates of the responders. In order to test the second hypothesis we compare the offers that proposers anticipate will be accepted by the responders and the offers they actually make. If actual offer exceeds the minimum acceptable offer anticipated by the proposer, we conclude that he is fair minded. Otherwise, he is being generous due to fear of rejection. In order to test the third hypothesis, we compare the offers and responses made by males and females in this game. At the start of this study, we were of the view that the people of an Islamic society, in general, and students of International Islamic University, Islamabad, in particular, would show a greater concern for fairness rather than fear of rejection. As is evident, the results of this study prove these views wrong. Further, this fear of rejection was very realistic, particularly, in case of males where the rejection rates for unfair offers were very high.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Ultimatum games, fairness, self-interest, gender
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C92 - Laboratory, Group Behavior; D - Microeconomics > D0 - General; D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D03 - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles

References

Almer, E. (2000), What Women Need to Know About Starting Up, The New York Times: 9, New York, NY

Andreoni, J. and Vesterlund, L. (2001), Which is the Fair Sex? Gender Differences in Altruism, The Quartely Journal of Economics, 116

Andreoni, J. and Petrie, R. (2004), Beauty, Gender and Stereotypes: Evidence from Laboratory Experiments, SSRI Working Paper 2004-06, Department of Economics, University of Wisconsin, Madison

Aranoff, D. and Tcdeschi, J.T. (1968), Original Stakes and Behavior in the Prisoner's Dilemma Game, Psychonomic Science, 12(2)

Ayres, I. (1991), Fair Driving: Gender and Race Discrimination in Retail Car Negotiations, Harvard Law Review, 104

Baxter, S. and Lansing, M. (1983), Women and Politics: The Visible Majority, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI

Bem, S.L. (1993), The Lenses of Gender: Transforming the Debate on Sexual Inequality, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT

Bolton, G.E. and Katok, E. (1995), An Experimental Test for Gender Differences in Beneficent Behavior, Economic Letters, vol. 48

Bolton, G.E. and Zwick, R. (1995), Anonymity versus Punishment in Ultimatum Bargaining, Games and Economic Behavior, Vol.10

Botelho, A., Hirsh, M.A. and Rutström, E.E. (2000), Culture, Nationality and Demographics in Ultimatum Games, Working Paper Series No. 7, Núcleo de Investigaçao em Microeconomia Aplicada, Universidade do Minho

Brown-Kruse, J. and Hummels, D. (1993), Gender Effects in Laboratory Public Goods Contributions: Do Individuals Put Their Money Where Their Mouth Is?, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 22(3)

Buchan, N.R., Croson, R. and Johnson, E.J. (1999), Understanding What’s Fair: Contrasting Perceptions of Fairness In Ultimatum Bargaining in Japan and the United States, Discussion Paper, University Of Wisconsin

Calhoun, P.S. and Smith, W.P. (1999), Integrative Bargaining: Does Gender Make a Difference?, International Journal of Conflict Management, 10 (3)

Cameron, L.A. (1999), Raising the Stakes in the Ultimatum Game: Experimental Evidence from Indonesia, Economic Inquiry 37

Christy, C.A. (1987), Sex Differences in Political Participation: Process of Change in Fourteen Nations, Praeger, New York, NY

Cooperstock, R. and Parnell, P. (1982), Research on Psychotropic Drug Use: a Review of Findings and Methods, Social Science and Medicine, vol. 16

Croson, R. (1996), Information in Ultimatum Games: An Experimental Study, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 30

Croson, R. and Buchan, N. (1999), Gender and Culture: International Experimental Evidence from Trust Games, The American Economic Review, Vol. 89, No. 2

Dawes, R.M., McTavish, J. and Shaklee, H. (1977), Behavior, Communication, and Assumptions about Other People's Behavior in a Common Dilemma Situation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(1)

Dufwenberg, M. and Gneezy, U. (2004), Gender & Coordination, Working Paper 2004-02, Department of Economics, University of Arizona, Tuscon

Eagly, A.H. (1995), The Science and Politics of Comparing Women and Men, American Psychologist, 50 (3)

Eagly, A.H. and Crowley, M. (1986), Gender and Helping Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Social Psychological Literature, Psychological Bulletin, 100(3)

Eckel, C.C. and Grossman, P.J. (1996), The Relative Price of Fairness: Gender Differences in a Punishment Game, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 30(2)

Eckel, C.C. and Grossman, P.J. (1998), Are Women Less Selfish than Men?: Evidence from Dictator Experiments, The Economic Journal, 108(448)

Eckel, C.C. and Grossman, P.J. (2001), Chivalry and Solidarity in Ultimatum Games, Economic Inquiry, 39 (2)

Eckel, C.C. and Grossman, P.J. (forthcoming), Differences in The Economic Decisions of Men and Women: Experimental Evidence, in C. Plott and V.L. Smith (eds) Handbook of Results in Experimental Economics, Elsevier Inc., USA

Elliott, C.S., Hayward, D.M. and Canon, S. (1998), Institutional Framing: Some Experimental Evidence, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 35 (4)

Forsythe, R., Horowitz, J.L., Savin, N.E. and Sefton, M. (1994), Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments, Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 6

Gerhart, B. and Rynes, S. (1991), Determinants and Consequences of Salary Negotiations by Male and Female MBA Graduates, Journal of Applied Psychology, 76 (2)

Gilligan, C. (1982), In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

Goertzel, T.G. (1983), The Gender Gap: Sex, Family Income, and Political Opinions in the Early 1980's, Journal of Political and Military Sociology, vol. 11

Gottfredson, M.R. and Hirschi, T. (1990), A General Theory of Crime, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA

Güth, W., Schmittberger, R. and Schwarze, B. (1982), An Experimental Analysis of Ultimatum Bargaining, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3:4

Henrich, J. (2000), Does Culture Matter in Economic Behavior? Ultimatum Game Bargaining among the Machiguenga of the Peruvian Amazon, American Economic Review 90

Kahn, A., Hottes, J. and Davis, W.L. (1971), Cooperation and Optimal Responding in the Prisoner's Dilemma Game: Effects of Sex and Physical Attractiveness, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17(3)

Kandel, D.B. and Logan, J.A. (1984), Patterns of Drug Use from Adolescence to Young Adulthood: Periods of Risk for Initiation, Continued Use, and Discontinuation, American Journal of Public Health, vol. 74

Kolb, D.M. and Putnam, L.L. (1997), Through the Looking Glass: Negotiation Theory Refracted Through the Lens of Gender, in Sandra E. Gleason (ed.) Workplace Dispute Resolution: Directions for the Twenty-First Century, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan

Lazaer, E. and Rosen, S. (1990), Male-Female Wage Differentials in Job Ladders, Journal of Labor Economics, 8

Lewicki, R. and Litterer, J. (1985), Negotiation, Homewood, IL: Irwin

List, J.A. and Cherry, T.L. (2000), Learning to Accept in Ultimatum Games: Evidence from an Experimental Design that Generates Low Offers, Experimental Economics 3

Lopomo, G. and Ok, E.A. (2001), Bargaining, Interdependence, and the Rationality of Fair Division, Journal of Economics, Vol. 32, No. 2

Mack, D., Auburn, P.N. and Knight, G.P. (1971), Sex Role Identification and Behavior in a Reiterated Prisoner's Dilemma Game, Psychonomic Science. 24(6)

Mason, C.F, Phillips, O.R. and Redington, D.B. (1991), The Role of Gender in a Non-Cooperative Game, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 15(2)

McPherson, D. and Hirsch, B. (1995), Wages and Gender Composition: Why do Women’s Jobs Pay Less?, Journal of Labor Economics 13

Meux, E.P (1973), Concern for the Common Good in an n-Person Game, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28(3)

Moore, D.W. (1996), Clinton's Increased Support over Past Year: Older Independents, Richest and Poorest Americans, Gallup News Service, vol. 60

Munier, B. and Zaharia, C. (1998), High Stakes do Change Acceptance Behavior in Ultimatum Bargaining Games: Experimental Evidence from France and Romania, Discussion paper, ENS Cachan

Nowell, C. and Tinkler, S. (1994), The Influence of Gender on the Provision of a Public Good, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 25(1)

Oosterbeek, H., Sloof, R. and Van de Kuilen, G. (2004), Cultural Differences in Ultimatum Game Experiments: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis, Experimental Economics, 7

Orbell, J., Dawes, R. and Schwartz-Shea, P. (1994), Trust, Social Categories, and Individuals: The Case of Gender, Motivation and Emotion, 18(2)

Ortmann, A. and Tichy, L.K. (1999), Gender Effects in the Laboratory: Evidence from Prisoners' Dilemma Games, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 39(3)

Prakash, S. (2000), Women in Business, Morning Edition, National Public Radio, Washington, D.C.

Rapoport, A. and Chammah, A.M. (1965), Sex Differences in Factors Contributing to the Level of Cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma Game, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2(6)

Riley, H.C. (2000), Expectations and Gender in Negotiation, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA

Riley, H. and McGinn, K.L. (2002), When Does Gender Matter in Negotiation? Faculty Research Working Paper 02-036, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA

Rosenthal, B. and Rodrigues, M. (2000), Women-Owned Firms Attract Investors for Business Growth, National Foundation for Women Business Owners, Washington, D.C.

Smith, V.L. (1962), An Experimental Study of Competitive Market Behavior, The Journal of Political Economy, 70(2)

Smith, V.L. (1994), Economics in the Laboratory, Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(1)

Slonim, R. and Roth, A.E. (1998), Learning in High Stakes Ultimatum Games: An Experiment in the Slovak Republic, Econometrica 66

Solnick, S.J. (2001), Gender Differences in Ultimatum Games, Economic Inquiry, 39 (2)

Stevens, C.K., Bavetta, A.G. and Gist, M.E. (1993), Gender Differences in the Acquisition of Salary Negotiation Skills: The Role of Goals, Self-Efficacy, and Perceived Control, Journal of Applied Psychology, 78 (5)

Stockard, J., Van De Kragt, A.J.C. and Dodge, P.J. (1988), Gender Roles and Behavior in Social Dilemmas: Are There Sex Differences in Cooperation and in Its Justification?, Social Psychology Quarterly, 51(2)

Stramer, C. (2003), On Testing Game Theory, Discussion paper prepared for the workshop on The Role of Experimental Methods in Economics (September 13-14), University of Nottingham, UK

Thaler, R.H. (1988), Anomalies: The Ultimatum Game, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 2, No. 4

Uesugi. T.K. and Vinacke, E.W. (1963), Strategy in a Feminine Game, Sociometry, 26(1)

Vinacke, W. E. (1959), Sex Roles in a Three-Person Game, Sociometry, 22(4)

Wiebull, J.W. (2002), Testing Game Theory, SSE Working Paper 382, Stockholm School of Economics and Research Institute of Industrial Economics, Stockholm, Sweden.

Wilson, J.Q. and Herrnstein R.J. (1985), Crime and Human Nature, Simon and Schuster, New York, NY