Qazi, Ahmar Qasim and Zhao, Yulin (2013): Indigenous R&D Effectiveness and Technology Transfer on Productivity Growth: Evidence from the Hi-Tech Industry of China.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_46589.pdf Download (685kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The study employs the panel data of 15 hi-tech industries over the period of 2000-2010 in order to examine the effectiveness of R&D with respect to productivity change and indentify the significant contributing factors with intensity in the Chinese hi-tech sector. The Malmquist Productivity Indexes are calculated by using the non-parametric programming technique and censored regression model is applied to conduct the empirical investigation. We find that on average, the sector is confronting productivity deterioration which is mainly due to the technical inefficiency. The Office Equipments industry has the highest productivity gain in our sample at the rate of, on average, 3.7% per year and all of which is caused by technical change. Furthermore, the electronic components industry is found to be the most efficient industry in the sector that drives an industry to have productivity progress on average, of 1.7% per year over the study period. At last, Tobit results indicate that spillovers through FDI and technology import are having significant and positive effect on the productivity progress.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Indigenous R&D Effectiveness and Technology Transfer on Productivity Growth: Evidence from the Hi-Tech Industry of China |
English Title: | Indigenous R&D Effectiveness and Technology Transfer on Productivity Growth: Evidence from the Hi-Tech Industry of China |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Productivity Growth;DEA;Tobit Model |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C34 - Truncated and Censored Models ; Switching Regression Models C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C61 - Optimization Techniques ; Programming Models ; Dynamic Analysis D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D24 - Production ; Cost ; Capital ; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity ; Capacity |
Item ID: | 46589 |
Depositing User: | Mr Ahmar Qazi Qazi |
Date Deposited: | 28 Apr 2013 17:18 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 08:38 |
References: | Abramovitz, M.(1956).Resources and output trends in theU.S.since1870. American EconomicReview, 46, 5–23. A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, E. Rhodes. (1978).Measuring the efficiency of decision making units [J]. European Journal of OperationalResearch, 2(6): 429-444. Aitken B. and A. Harrison,(1999) Are there positive spillovers from direct foreign investment?: Evidence from panel data for Morocco.American Economic Review 42, 51-74. Anthony N. Rezitis (2006), Productivity Growth in the Greek Banking Industry: A Non-Parametric Approach Journal of Applied Economics. Vol IX, No. 1 ( 119-138) A. Hashimoto, S. Haneda (2008). Measuring the change in R&D efficiency of the Japanese pharmaceutical industry. Research Policy,37(10): 1829-1836 A. M. Zhang, Y. M. Zhang, R. Zhao. (2003). A study of the R&D efficiency and productivity of Chinese firms. Journal of Comparative Economics, , 31(3):444-464. Blomstrom, M. and F. Sjoholm, (1999)Technology transfer and spillovers: Does local participation with multinationals matter?European Economic Review 43, 915-923. Boussofiane, A.,Dyson,R.G.,&Thannassoulis,E.(1991)Applied data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research,52, 1–15. Bwalya S M (2006). Foreign direct investment and technology spillovers: Evidence from panel data analysis of manufacturing firms in Zambia. Journal of Development Economics, 81:514–526 Caves,W.,Christensen,L.R.& Diewert,W.E.(1982)The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input,output and productivity. Econometrica, 50, 1393–1414. C.J.Chen, H.L. Wu, B.W. Lin (2006) Evaluating the development of hi-tech industries:Taiwan’s science park(J). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(4):452-465 Charnes, Cooper & Rhodes (1978), Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages 429–444 Coelli, T.,Rao,D.S.P.,&Battese,G.E.(1998). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers Coe, D. and E. Helpman (1995) .International R&D spillovers. European Economic Review, 859-87. Cummins,J.D.,&Weiss,M.A.(1999)Analyzing firm performance in the insurance industry using frontier efficiency and productivity methods. InG.Dionne (Ed.), Handbook of insurance. Boston,MA:Kluwer Academic Publishers. Denison, E. F. (1962). The sources of economic growth in the United States and the alternatives before us. Supplementary Paper no. 13.New York Committee for Economic Development. E. C. Wang, W. C. Huang.( 2007). Relative efficiency of R&D activities: A cross-country study accounting for environmental factors in the DEA approach[J]. Research Policy, 36(2): 260-273. Fare, R.,&Grosskopf,S.(1992).Malmquist indexes and Fisher ideal indexes. The Economic Journal, 102(410), 158–160. Fare, R.,Grosskopf,S.,Norris,M.,&Zhang,Z.(1994)Productivity growth,technical progress,and efficiency change in industrialized countries. American Economic Review, 84, 66–83. Fare, R.,Grosskopf,S.,&Roos,P.(1995)Productivity and quality changes in Swedish pharmacies. International Journal of Production Economics, 39(1/2), 137–147. F. Wei, Y. L. Zhao.(2008)Empirical study on the innovation efficiency of high-tech industries in China[J]. Industrial Technology & Economy, 27(8): 114-117. (in Chinese) Fu Ning (2007). R&D intensity and import-oriented technology spillover: An empirical study based on the absorptive capability in China,World Economy, (11): 37–42 Giuffrida, A.(1999)Productivity and efficiency changes in primary care:A Malmquist index approach.Health Care Management Science, 2, 11–26. Griliches Zvi (1960), Measuring inputs in agriculture: A critical survey. Journal of Farm Economics 42 (5): 1411-27 Griliches Zvi (1963), The sources of measured productivity growth: U.S. agriculture, 1940-1960. Journal of Political Economy 71 (4): 331-46. H.C.Co, K.S. Chew (1997). Performance and R&D expenditures in American and Japanese manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Research, 35(12):3333-3348 H. C. Wu. (2008). Analysis on R&D efficiency of hi-tech industries in China (J). R&D Management, 20(5): 83-89. (in Chinese) James Tobin (1958), Estimation of Relationships for Limited Dependent Variables, Econometrica, Vol. 26, No. 1, J. P. Peng, J. H. Zhang. (2007). Experimental analysis of effect on the R&D input of the dynamic panel data model in China [J]. Systems Engineering, 25(12): 47-52. (in Chinese) Kendrick (1973), Postwar Productivity Trends in the United States, 1948-1969," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research,Inc, number kend73-1. Kendrick, (1976),The Formation and Stocks of Total Capital, NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Kendrick, (1977), Understanding productivity: An introduction to the dynamics of productivity change, Book, John Hopkins University Malmquist, S.(1953).Index numbers and in difference surfaces. Trabajos deEstadistica, 4, 209–242. Mawson, Carlaw and McLellan (2003), Productivity measurement: Alternative approaches and estimates, New Zealand Treasury, Working Paper 03/12 McDonald JF, Moffitt RA (1980). The uses of tobit analysis. Rev. Econ.Stat., 62(2): 318-321. M. J. Farrell.(1957).The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120(3): 253-290. Morrison, (1986), Productivity measurement with non-static expectations and varying capacity utilization : An integrated approach,Journal of Econometrics Volume 33, Issues 1–2, Pages 51–74 R. D. Banker, A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper.( 1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis[J]. Management Science, 30: 1078-1092. Robert M. Solow (1975), Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 39,No. 3. pp. 312-320. Schreyer and Pilat (2001), Measuring Productivity, OECD Economic Studies No. 33, 2001/II S. H. Wei, G. S. Wu. (2008). An empirical study on spatial distribution and its changing trends of regional R&D expenditure in China [J]. R&D Management, 20(1):72-77. (in Chinese) S.Sharma, V.J. Thomas (2008). Inter-country R&D efficiency analysis:An application of data envelopment analysis. Scientometrics, 76(3):483-501 T. J. Coelli, D. S. P. Rao.(2005) Total factor productivity growth in agriculture: a Malmquist index analysis of 93 countries, 1980-2000[J]. Agricultural Economics, 32(1): 115-134. Wei Shou-hua,Jiang Ning,Wu Gui-sheng.(2009) Endogenous R&D Effort Indigenous Technological Spillovers and Innovative Performance of High-tech Industry in the Yangtze River Delta in China[J]. China Industrial Economics. 25-34. Wu He-cheng.(2008) Analysis on R&D efficiency of Hi-tech industries in China[J] R&D MANAGEMENT 20(5):83-89 X. D. Zhang, Z. X. Wang.( 2008) Study on the correlation between China’s R&D budget and hi-tech industry outputs[J]. Studies in Science of Science,26(3): 526-529. (in Chinese) Xielin Liu & Steven White (2001), Comparing innovation systems: a framework and application to China’s transitional context, Research Policy 30 (2001) 1091–1114 Xing & Zhang (2009) Impact of Foreign Technology Transfer on Indigenous R&D in China. (in Chinese) Economic Research Journal,No. 6, pp.94-104 X. Xu, Q. Chen, and B. Y. Zheng.( 2008). The determinant factors of R&D expenditure:An empirical research based on high-tech industry [J]. Studies in Science of Science, 26(2): 304-310. (in Chinese) Yuko Kinoshita (2000) R&D and Technology Spillovers via FDI: Innovation and Absorptive Capacity. William Davidson Institute Working Paper No. 349. Z. Y. Liu, L. L. Liang.( 2008) Empirical study of the effect of high-tech manufactures on the economic growth of China[J]. Industrial Technology & Economy, 27(5): 41-44. (in Chinese) Zhu L, Jeon B N (2007). International R&D spillovers: Trade, FDI, and information technology as spillover channels. Review of International Economics, 15(5): 955–976 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/46589 |