Extension Reforms and Innovations in Technology Dissemination- ATMA Model in India

Singh, K.M. and Swanson, Burton E. and Jha, A.K. and Meena, M.S. (2012): Extension Reforms and Innovations in Technology Dissemination- ATMA Model in India.

Abstract

Decentralizing a large, complex national extension system is not easy, but the Government of India appears to be moving toward this long-term goal. Although ATMA model has been successful in addressing many of the extension problems and has shown exceptional impacts during the NATP phase but it seems to be going the T&V way. It is therefore, imperative that in the country like India, which has a vast territory and extremely diverse socio-economic and agro-climatic situations, ATMA model should be introduced and implemented with utter cautious. Different ATMAs should be empowered with sufficient administrative, financial and implementation flexibilities to address the basic problems in their operational jurisdiction.

The use of FIGs to mobilize men, women, and young people around common interests, such as the production of flowers, fruits, vegetables, milk, fish and other high-value products, has energized both the farming community and the extension staff. Many FIGs have joined to form farmer associations or federations that can gain economies of scale in serving larger markets. Developing strong farmer organizations is a positive and necessary step in providing cost-effective extension services that will increase the income and employment of small-scale and marginal farm households. The block-level FACs are operational in most project blocks, but rural women and other disadvantaged groups still need more representation. Internal conflicts continue between priorities set by the ATMA Governing Boards and the heads of the line departments in allocating central government resources. The BTTs are still learning how to work together in utilizing a farming systems approach with multiple funding sources.

There is no doubt that something that resembles a 21st centre vision of agricultural extension is needed and this means substantial reforms in public policies and services. Adding urgency to this is the ever-increasing complexity of agricultural sector development and the sector’s acknowledged role in poverty reduction. Of course, it is all too easy to criticise new approaches, such as ATMA. It is also important to realise that in a country like India and, indeed, elsewhere, administrative traditions and realities place limits on what is possible and politically feasible even as a pilot. But the challenge remains of how to break out of this best practice to best fit impasse.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Market-led Extension, Demand-driven extension, Extension Reforms, Indian Extension system
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O2 - Development Planning and Policy > O21 - Planning Models ; Planning Policy; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O38 - Government Policy; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q16 - R&D ; Agricultural Technology ; Biofuels ; Agricultural Extension Services; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q18 - Agricultural Policy ; Food Policy

References

ICAR. 2006. Framework for Technology Development and Delivery System in Agriculture. www.icar.org.in/miscel/tdd-final.pdf

Ministry of Agriculture. 2000. Policy framework for agricultural extension. Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, Extension Division. Available at: http://agricoop.nic.in/policy_framework.htm .

Indian Institute of Management, Lucknow. 2004a. Impact Assessment Report, on the Innovations in Technology Dissemination (ITD) Component of the National Agricultural Technology Project, Agriculture Management Centre.

Indian Institute of Management, Lucknow. 2004b. Successful Case Studies, Interventions and Innovations in Technology Dissemination, Agriculture Management Centre, IIM, Lucknow.

National Institute of Agricultural Extension Management (MANAGE).2004. Process Change in Agricultural Extension: Experiences under ITD Component of NATP, 2004.

Planning Commission, Govt. of India, 2007. Recommendations of Working Group on Agricultural Extension for Formulation of Eleventh Five-Year Plan (2007-12). http://planningcommission.nic.in/ aboutus/ committee/wrkgrp11/wg11_agrext.pdf

Singh, J.P. 2005. From Self-help Groups to Commodity-based Commodity Associations: The Indian Approach to Mobilizing Rural Women, presentation at the Workshop on Building New Partnerships in the Global Food Chain, Chicago, June 29–30, 2005.

Singh, J.P., B.E. Swanson and K.M. Singh. 2005. Organizing and Linking Farmers with Markets: Experience of the NATP Project in India, presentation at the 15th Annual World Food & Agribusiness Symposium, Chicago, June 27, 2005.

Singh, K.M., B.E. Swanson and J.P. Singh. 2005. Development of Supply Chains for Medicinal Plants: A Case Study Involving the Production of Vinca Rosa by Small Farmers in the Patna District of Bihar India, paper presented at the Workshop on Building New Partnerships in the Global Food Chain, Chicago, June 29–30, 2005.

Singh, K.M. 2006. Impact of ATMA Model in Agricultural Extension System in Bihar- A Case Study of Pilot Project Districts, World Bank, India Office, New Delhi. P.78.

Singh, J.P., Swanson, B.E and Singh K.M.2005. Developing a Decentralized, Market-Driven Extension System in India: The ATMA Model. Good Practice Paper prepared for the World Bank, Washington DC.

Swanson, B.E. and P.N. Mathur.2003 Review of the Agricultural Extension System in India, unpublished report.

Swanson, Burton E. 2008. Rejoinder and Comments on The fallacy of universal solutions in extension: Is ATMA the new T&V? Link Look, September 2008. https:// www. blogger.com/comment.g?blogID= 3251429753511756567& post ID=7578065374288803918&pli=1

Technology Dissemination Unit and MANAGE.2004. Project Completion Report, Innovations in Technology Dissemination Component of the National Agricultural Technology Project, MANAGE.

Tyagi, Y. and Verma, S. 2004. Economic Rate of Return of Innovations in Technology Dissemination Component of the National Agricultural Technology Project, submitted to the National Institute of Agricultural Extension Management (MANAGE), Hyderabad.

World Bank. 2005a. Agricultural Investment Source Book, Module-3 http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/EXTARD/EXTAGISOU/0,,content MDK:20932047~pagePK:64168445~piPK:64168309~theSitePK:2502781,00.html

World Bank. 2005b. NATP Implementation Completion Report, World Bank.