Morales Meoqui, Jorge (2012): Essence and merits of David Ricardo’s proof of comparative advantage.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_49114.pdf Download (222kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Due to a precise definition of comparative advantage and a deeper understanding of the logical interrelationships between this proposition and the two other main elements in David Ricardo’s famous numerical example – the classical rule of specialization and the proposition regarding the non-appliance of the labor theory of value in international exchanges –, it is possible to fully appreciate the merits of his proof of comparative advantage in chapter seven of the Principles. This has important consequences for the longstanding authorship-debate over comparative advantage, because it leads to a more accurate account of the crucial omissions and shortcomings in Robert Torrens’ competing statement in his Essay on the External Corn Trade (1815). Since Torrens fell short of formulating a full proof of the comparative-advantage proposition prior to the publication of the Principles, he is not entitled to the same amount of merit as Ricardo.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Essence and merits of David Ricardo’s proof of comparative advantage |
English Title: | Essence and merits of David Ricardo’s proof of comparative advantage |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | comparative advantage, David Ricardo, Robert Torrens, international trade theory, classical political economy, free trade |
Subjects: | B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B3 - History of Economic Thought: Individuals > B31 - Individuals B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B12 - Classical (includes Adam Smith) F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F10 - General A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A11 - Role of Economics ; Role of Economists ; Market for Economists |
Item ID: | 49114 |
Depositing User: | Jorge Morales Meoqui |
Date Deposited: | 16 Aug 2013 15:51 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 10:27 |
References: | Aldrich, J. (2004). The Discovery of Comparative Advantage. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 26(3), pp. 379–399. Chipman, J. S. (1965). A Survey of the Theory of International Trade: Part 1, The Classical Theory. Econometrica , 33 (3), pp. 477-519. Hollander, J. H. (1911). Ricardo and Torrens. The Economic Journal , 21, pp. 455-468. Hollander, S. (1979). The Economics of David Ricardo. London: Heinemann. Irwin, D. A. (1998). Against the Tide: An Intellectual History of Free Trade. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press. Kemp, M. C., & Okawa, M. (2006). The Torrens–Ricardo Principle of Comparative Advantage: an Extension. Review of International Economics , 14 (3), pp. 466–477. Maneschi, A. (1998). Comparative Advantage in International Trade. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. Maneschi, A. (2004). The true meaning of David Ricardo’s four magic numbers. Journal of International Economics, 62 (2), pp.433–443. Maneschi, A. (2008). How Would David Ricardo Have Taught the Principle of Comparative Advantage? Southern Economic Journal, 74 (4), pp.1167–1176. Mill, J. (1826). Elements of Political Economy (3rd Edition ed.). London: Baldwin, Cradock and Joy . Mill, J. S. (1963-1991). The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. (J. M. Robson, Ed.) London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Morales Meoqui, J. (2011). Comparative Advantage and the Labor Theory of Value. History of Political Economy , 43 (4), pp. 743-763. Pullen, J. (2006). Did Ricardo Really Have a Law of Comparative Advantage? A Comparison of Ricardo's Version and the Modern Version. History of Economics Review , 44, pp. 59-75. Ricardo, D. (2004). The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo. (P. Sraffa, Ed.) Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, Inc. Robbins, L. (1958). Robert Torrens and the Evolution of Classical Economics. London: Macmillan. Rothbard, M. L. (1995). Classical Economics. Cheltenham (U.K.): Edward Elgar. Ruffin, R. J. (2002). David Ricardo's Discovery of Comparative Advantage. History of Political Economy , 34 (4), pp. 727-748. Ruffin, R. J. (2005). Debunking a Myth: Torrens on Comparative Advantage. History of Political Economy , 37 (4), pp. 711-722. Schonhardt-Bailey, Ch. (2006). From Corn Laws to Free Trade: Interests, Ideas, and Institutions in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press. Seligman, E. R. (1903, September). On Some Neglected British Economists. The Economic Journal , 13 (51), pp. 335-363. Seligman, E. R. (1911). Ricardo and Torrens. The Economic Journal , 21, pp. 448-455. Sraffa, P. (1930). An Alleged Correction of Ricardo. The Quarterly Journal of Economics , 44 (3), pp. 539-544. Thweatt, W. O. (1976). James Mill and the Early Development of Comparative Advantage. HOPE , 8 (2), 207-234. Torrens, R. (2000). Collected Works of Robert Torrens (Vols. I-VIII). (G. d. Vivo, Ed.) Bristol: Thoemmes Press. Viner, J. (1937). Studies in the Theory of International Trade. London: Allen & Unwin. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/49114 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
On the distribution of authorship-merits for the comparative-advantage proposition. (deposited 12 Jan 2012 19:03)
-
Nature and merits of Ricardo’s statement of comparative advantage. (deposited 24 Sep 2012 22:04)
- Essence and merits of David Ricardo’s proof of comparative advantage. (deposited 16 Aug 2013 15:51) [Currently Displayed]
-
Nature and merits of Ricardo’s statement of comparative advantage. (deposited 24 Sep 2012 22:04)