Vers une autre science économique (et donc une autre institution de cette science)

Yefimov, Vladimir (2010): Vers une autre science économique (et donc une autre institution de cette science). Published in: Revue du Mauss permanente (10 May 2010)

Abstract

Permanent readers of this journal have certainly noticed that the title of this article has a great similarity with the title of the issue No. 30 of the Revue du MAUSS. At first glance, the title of this issue “Toward another economic science (and thus toward another world)” may seem odd. Indeed, if the word "economic" is replaced in this title by the words "physical" ("chemical" or "biological"), we get a very strange statement: another type of physics (chemistry or biology) gives us another world in which we are supposed to live, that is to say, the physical properties of materials become different, chemical reactions occur differently, and biological properties of organisms are transformed. But if for natural sciences, this sentence does not make sense, it has a deep meaning for economics. The constructivist institutionalism gives us the key to understand this meaning. Following this institutionalism, economics provides society with the elements for the socio-economic-political discourse, and it is itself part of this discourse, which in turn significantly influence institutional change. This feature of economics creates a temptation for economists to go directly to the discourse (mainly what should be) without devoting enough attention to the study of reality (what is). The fact that economists do not resist this temptation has serious consequences: despite their good intentions, the proposed solutions elaborated without knowledge of the details of reality either do not give the expected results or often cause negative unexpected consequences. The 20th century gives plenty of evidence of this kind. According to social constructivism, "institutionalization occurs whenever there is a reciprocal typification of habitualized actions by types of actors. Put it differently, any such typification is an institution" [Berger and Luckmann, 1991, p. 72]. It is not enough to define institutions just as rules, but according to social constructivism, we consider them as rules when they become habits. The constructivist institutionalism sees the source of social regularities in these habits, and in this way it requires to study institutions as the foreground of the economy rather than its background. This type of study requires close ("ethnographic") observation made in the past by the German ethico-historical school (Gustav Schmoller) and the Wisconsin institutional school (John Commons). Heterodox economists (post-Keynesians, Marxists, regulationists, conventionalists, socio-economists) who see institutions as the background of the economy, practice remote observations and do not exercise the collection of detailed information about the rules and beliefs that support them contained in the discourses of actors. From this point of view, we can consider that the orthodox and most of the heterodox currents belong to the same paradigm that does not provide an understanding of economic reality and which does not make us capable to foresee the arrival of such phenomena as the current crisis and to explain their mechanisms. The few who have managed to do so did their research in the framework of another paradigm, that of constructivist institutionalism, perhaps without knowing it. The transition of the community of economists to this paradigm requires a radical institutional reform of the profession. The constructivist institutionalism also gives us some suggestions on how to run this reform.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Toward another economic science (and thus toward another institution of this science)
• Language: French
• Keywords: constructivist institutionalism, socio-economic-political discourse, discourses of actors, Gustav Schmoller, John Commons, institution of economics, radical institutional reform of the economics profession
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A11 - Role of Economics ; Role of Economists ; Market for Economists; A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A12 - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines; A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A13 - Relation of Economics to Social Values; A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A14 - Sociology of Economics; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B41 - Economic Methodology; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B52 - Institutional ; Evolutionary

References

Aglietta M., 1976, Régulation et crise du capitalisme, Editions Calmann-Lévy, Paris.

Aglietta M. et A. Rebérioux, 2004, Dérives du capitalisme financier, Albin Michel, Paris.

Aglietta et Berrebi, 2007, Désordres dans le capitalisme mondial, Odile Jacob, Paris.

Aglietta et Rigot, 2009, Crise et rénovation de la finance, Odile Jacob, Paris.

Aglietta M., S. Khanniche et S. Rigot, 2010, Les hedge funds. Entrepreneurs ou requins de la finance ? Perrin, Paris.

Amable B. et S. Palombarini, 2005, L’économie politique n’est pas une science morale, Raison d’Agir, Paris.

Baker D. et M. Weisbrot, 1999, Social Security. The Phony Crisis. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.

Bateman B.W., 1998, “Clearing the Ground: The Demise of the Social Gospel Movement and the Rise of Neoclassicism in American Economics” in [Morgan and Rutherford, 1998], p. 29 –52.

Berger P. et T. Luckmann, 1991, The Social Construction of Reality, Penguin Books, London.

Bewley T.F., 1999, Why Wages Don’t Fall during a Recession, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England.

Blaug M., 1994, « Why I am not a Constructivist. Confession of an Unrepentant Popperian », in Backhouse R. E. (sous la direction de), New Directions in Economic Methodology, Routledge, Londres. p. 111 – 139.

Blaug M., 1998, La pensée économique, Economica, Paris.

Boyer R. et J. Mistral, 1978, Accumulation, inflation, crises, Presse universitaires de France, Paris.

Boyer R., M. Dehove et D. Plihon, 2004, Les crises financières, La documentation française, Paris.

Brennan G. et J. Buchanan, 1985, The Reason of Rules: Constitutional Political Economy, Cambridge University Press, New York.

Brousseau E. et J.-M. Glachant (sous la direction de), 2008, New Institutional Economics: A Guidebook, Cambridge University Press, New York.

Bryant A. et K. Charmaz, 2007, The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.

Burtt E., 2003, The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Science, Dover Publications, New York.

Bush P.D., 1993, “The Methodology of Institutional Economics: A Pragmatic Instrumentalist Perspective”, in Tool M. R. (sous la direction de). Institutional Economics: Theory, Method, Policy, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Dordrecht, London, p. 59 – 118.

Caillé A., 2007, « Présentation », La Revue du M.A.U.S.S. n° 30 : Vers une autre science économique (et donc un autre monde), (Second semestre 2007), La Découverte, Paris, p. 5 – 28.

Caillé A. et alii, 2007, « Un quasi-manifeste institutionnaliste, suivi de Vers une économie politique institutionnaliste ? », La Revue du M.A.U.S.S. n° 30 : Vers une autre science économique (et donc un autre monde), (Second semestre 2007), La Découverte, Paris, p. 33 – 48.

Carlson M.J., 1997, “Mirowski's Thesis and the "Integrability Problem" in Neoclassical Economics”, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 31, N° 3, September, p. 741 - 760.

Charle Ch. et J. Verger, 2007, Histoire des universités. PUF, Paris.

Coats A.W., 1993, The Sociology and Professionalization of Economics. British and American economic essays. Volume II, Routledge, London and New York.

Cohen D., 2009, La prospérité du vice. Une introduction (inquiète à l’économie), Albin Michel, Paris.

Combemale P., 2007, « L’hétérodoxie encore : continuer le combat, mais lequel ? », La Revue du M.A.U.S.S. n° 30 : Vers une autre science économique (et donc un autre monde) (Second sem. 2007), La Découverte, Paris, p. 56 – 67.

Commons J.R., 1964, Myself. The Autobiography of John R. Commons, The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.

Comte A., 1996, Philosophie des Sciences, Gallimard, Paris.

Cunningham W., 1894, “Why had Roscher so little influence in England ?”, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, November, p. 317 – 334.

Davis D.B., D.W. Hands and U. Maki (sous la direction de), 1998, The Handbook of Economic Methodology, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

Degnbol-Martinussen J., 2001, Policies, Institutions and Industrial Development. Coping with Liberalisation and International Competition in India, Sage Publications, New Delhi.

Denis H.,1966, Histoire de la pensée économique, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.

Ely R.T., 1938, Ground under our Feet, Macmillan, New York.

Fichte J.G., 1994, La destination du savant, Vrin, Paris.

Fitoussi J.-P., 2001, L’Enseignement supérieur des sciences économiques en question, Fayard, Paris.

Forti A. et al., 1996, La mort de Newton. Maisonneuve et Larose, Paris.

Fourcade M., 2009, Economists and Societies. Discipline and Profession in the United States, Britain, and France, 1890s to 1990s. Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford.

Friedman M., 1953, “Methodology of Positive Economics”, in Milton Friedman, Essays in Positive Economics, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, p. 3 - 43.

Fullbrook E. (sous la direction de), 2008, Pluralist Economics, Zed Books, London & New-York.

Furner M.O., 1975, Advocacy & Objectivity: A Crisis in the Professionalization of American Social Science 1865-1905. University Press of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.

Galbraith J.K. (fils), The Predator State. How Conservatives Abandoned the Free Market and Why Liberals Should Too, 2008, Free Press, New York.

Geertz C., 1973, The Interpretation of Cultures, Basic Books, New York.

Gide Ch. et Ch. Rist, 2000, Histoire des doctrines économiques, Editions Dalloz – Sirey, Paris.

Goodwin C.D., 1998, “The Patrons of Economics in a Time of Transformation” in [Morgan and Rutherford, 1998], p. 53 – 81.

Gribbin J., 2003, Science. A History. 1543 – 2001. Penguin Books. London.

Grimmer-Solem E., 2003, The Rise of Historical Economics and Social Reform in Germany 1864 – 1894, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Guerrien B., 2003, “Is there anything worth keeping in standard microeconomics?”, in Fullbrook E. (sous la direction de), The Crisis in Economics, The post-autistic economics movement: the first 600 days, Routledge, London.

Hall P. A., 1992, “The movement from Keynesianism to monetarism: Institutional analysis and British economic policy in the 1970s”, in Steimo S., Thelen K. and F. Longstreth (sous la direction de), Structuring Politics. Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Harter L.G., 1962, John R. Commons: His Assault on Laissez-Faire, Oregon State University Press, Corvallis.

Hay C., 2006, « Constructivist Institutionalism », in Rhodes R.A.W., Binder S.A. et B.A. Rockman (sous la direction de), The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, Oxford University Press, New York, p. 56 – 74.

Heilbroner R. L., 1971, Les grands économistes, Editions du Seuil, Paris.

Heilbroner R. L., 2004, “Economics as Universal Science”, Social Research, Vol. 71, N° 3, p. 615 – 632.

Hodgson, G.M., 1988, Economics and Institutions, Polity Press, Cambridge.

Hudson M., 2003, Super Imperialism. The Origins and Fundamentals of U.S. World Dominance, Pluto Press, London and New York.

Humboldt (von) W., 1979, « Sur l’organisation interne et externe des établissements scientifiques supérieurs à Berlin (1809 ou 1810) » in Philosophies de l’université. L’idéalisme allemand et la question de l’Université, Payot, Paris, p. 319 – 329.

Jorion P., 2007, Vers la crise du capitalisme américain ? La Découverte, Paris.

Jorion P., 2008a, L’implosion. La finance contre l’économie. Ce que révèle et annonce la « crise des subprimes », Fayard, Paris.

Jorion P., 2008b, La crise. Des subprimes au séisme financier planétaire, Fayard, Paris.

Keynes J.M., 1963, Essays in Biography, W.W. Norton and Company, Inc., New York.

Knorr Cetina K., 1991, “Epistemic Cultures: Forms of Reason in Science”, History of Political Economy, No 1, v. 23, p. 105 – 122.

Labrousse A. et T. Lamarche, 2009, “Vers une association d’économie politique hétérodoxe ? Entretien avec Nicolas Postel et Richard Sobel », Revue de la régulation, Numéro 5 (1er semestre).

Latour B., 2000, “When things strike back: a possible contribution of ‘science studies’ to the social sciences”. British Journal of Sociology. Vol. 51, N° 1. pp. 107-123.

Latour B., 2006, Changer de société. Refaire de la sociologie, La Découverte, Paris.

Le Moigne J.-L., 2001, « Pourquoi je suis un constructiviste non repentant », La Revue du M.A.U.S.S. n° 17 : Chassez le naturel… Écologisme, naturalisme et constructivisme (Premier semestre 2001), La Découverte, Paris, p. 197-223.

MacKenzie D., 2006, An Engine, Not a Camera. How Financial Models Shape Markets, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England.

MacKenzie D., 2007, Do Economists Make Markets ? Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford. Mankiw N. G., 2006, "The Macroeconomist as Scientist and Engineer," Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 20(4), p. 29-46, Fall.

Marx K., 1993, Le Capital, Livre I, Presses universitaires de France, Paris.

Ménard C. and M.M. Shirley (sous la direction de), 2005, Handbook of New Institutional Economics, Springer, Dordrecht.

Menger C. (1883), Untersuchungen über die Methode der Sozialwissenschaften und der politischen Oekonomie insbesondere, Dunker u. Humblot, Leipzig.

Mill J.S., 1994, « On the definition and method of political economy » (1836). in D.M. Hausman (sous la direction de) The Philosophy of Economics. An Anthology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Mill J.S., 2008, Autobiography of John Stuart Mill (1873). Arc Manor, Rockville, Maryland.

Mini P., 1994, “Cartesianism in Economics”, in Hodgson, G.M., W.J. Samuels and M. R. Tool (sous la direction de), The Elgar Companion to Institutional and Evolutionary Economics, in two volumes, Edward Elgar, Aldershot, pp. 38 – 42.

Mirowski Ph., 1989, More Heat than Light. Economics as Social Physics: Physics as Nature’s Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Mittag G. (Leiter des Kollektivs), 1969, Politische Ökonomie des Sozialismus und ihre Anwendung in der DDR, Dietz Verlag, Berlin.

Morgan M.S. and M. Rutherford (sous la direction de), 1998, From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism, Duke University Press, Durham and London.

Mucchielli A., (sous la direction de), 1996, Dictionnaire des méthodes qualitatives en sciences humaines et sociales, Armand Colin, Paris.

Nelson R.H., 2001, Economics as Religion. From Samuelson to Chicago and Beyond, The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park.

North D.C., 2005, Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford.

Paley W., 1817, Principes de philosophie morale et politique, Tomes 1 et 2, Treuttel et Wurtz, Paris. Reproduit en 2007 en deux volumes par Elibron Classics.

Paley W., 2009, Théologie Naturelle: Ou, Preuves de l'existence et des Attributs de la Divinité, Tirées des Apparences de la Nature, University of Michigan Library, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Peukert H., 2001, “The Schmoller Renaissance”, History of Political Economy, Vol. 33, N° 1, Spring, p. 71-116.

Postel N., 2007, « Hétérodoxie et institution », La Revue du M.A.U.S.S. n° 30 : Vers une autre science économique (et donc un autre monde) (Second sem. 2007), La Découverte, Paris, p. 68 – 101.

Pouch T., 2001, Les économistes français et le marxisme. Apogée et déclin d’un discours critique (1959 – 2000), Presses Universitaires de Rennes, Rennes.

Prigogine I. et I. Stengers, 1986, La nouvelle alliance. Métamorphose de la science, Gallimard, Paris.

Reich R.B., 2007, Supercapitalism. The transformation of Business, Democracy, and Everyday Life, Albert A. Knopf, New York.

Rhodes R.A.W., Binder S.A. et B.A. Rockman (sous la direction de), The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, Oxford University Press, New York.

Rubinstein A., 2006, “Dilemmas of an Economic Theorist”. Econometrica, Vol. 74, No. 4 (July), p. 865–883.

Rutherford M., 2006, « Wisconsin Institutionalism : John R. Commons and his Students ». Labor History, 47 (May), p. 161 – 188.

Samuelson P.A. et W.A. Barnett, 2007, Inside the Economist’s Mind. Conversations with Eminent Economists, Blackwell, Oxford.

Schmoller G. 1883, « Zur Methodologie der Staats- und Sozial-Wissenschaften » in [Schmoller, 1998, S. 159 – 184].

Schmoller G., 1902, Politique sociale et économie politique, V. Giard & E. Brière. Paris. (Le texte du livre est accessible sur http://classiques.uqac.ca , les pages dans les références sont indiquées suivant cette version électronique)

Schmoller G., 1998, Historisch-ethnische Nationalökonomie als Kulturwissenschaft, Metropolis-Verlag, Marburg.

Schumpeter J.A., 1983, Histoire de l’analyse économique, I – L’âge des fondateurs, Gallimard, Paris.

Secada J. Cartesian Metaphysics. The Scholastic Origins of Modern Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Simiand F., 2006, Critique sociologique de l’économie. Textes présentés par Jean-Christophe Marcel et Pholippe Steiner, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.

Shapin S. et S. Schaffer, 1985, Leviathan and the Air-Pump. Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

Shapin S., 1996, The Scientific Revolution. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago and London.

Shiller R.J., 1991, Market Volatility, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England.

Shiller R.J., 1993, Macro Markets. Creating Institutions for Managing Society’s Largest Economic Risks, Oxford University Press, New York.

Shiller R.J., 2003, The New Financial Order, Risk in the 21st Century, Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford. Shiller R.J., 2005, Irrational Exuberance, Second Edition, Broadway Books, New York.

Shiller R.J., 2008, The Subprime Solution. How Today’s Global Financial Crisis Happened, and What to Do about It, Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford.

Suspitsyna T., 2005, Adaptation of Western Economics by Russian Universities. Intercultural Travel of an Academic Field, Routledge, New York.

Szenberg M. , Gottesman A. et L. Rarattan, 2005, Paul Samuelson. On being an Economist, Jorge Pinto Books, Inc., New York.

Tarde G., 1902, Psychologie économique, en deux volumes, Félix Alcan, Paris. (Le texte du livre est accessible sur http://classiques.uqac.ca )

Tribe K., 2002, Historical Schools of Economics: German and English. .Keele Economics Research Paper No 2, Keele University.

Usunier J.-C., Easterby-Smith M. et R. Thore, 2000, Introduction à la recherche en gestion, Economica, Paris.

Vidal J.-F., 2001, “Birth and Growth of the Regulation School in the French Intellectual Context (1970 – 1986)”, in Labrousse A. et J.-D. Weisz (sous la direction de), Institutional Economics in France and Germany. German Ordoliberalism versus French Regulation School, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.

Waterman A. M. C., 2004, Political Economy and Christian Theology since the Enlightenment. Essays in Intellectual History, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.

Weintraub E.R., 2002, How Economics Became a Mathematical Science, Duke University Press, Durham and London.

Wieviorka M., 2008, Neuf Leçons de Sociologie, Robert Laffont, Paris.

Wilkinson N., 2008, An Introduction to Behavioral Economics, Palgrave-Macmillan, New York.

Willinger M. et N. Eber, 2005, L’économie expérimentale, La Découverte, Paris.

Yefimov V., 1981, “Gaming-simulation of the Functioning of Economic Systems”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 2, N° 2, p.187 - 200.

Yefimov V., 2003, Economie institutionnelle des transformations agraires en Russie. l’Harmattan. Paris.