Islam, Jamal and Mohajan, Haradhan and Moolio, Pahlaj (2011): Borda voting is non-manipulable but cloning manipulation is possible. Published in: International Journal of Development Research and Quantitative Techniques , Vol. 2, No. 1 (30 June 2012): pp. 28-37.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_50848.pdf Download (108kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper deals with Borda count which is sincere voting system and originally proposed by French mathematician and philosopher Jeans-Charles Borda. In Borda count a defeated candidate can manipulate the election result in his favor in sincere way by introducing a candidate which is a clone of him and voters ranked this clone candidate immediately below him. In this situation Borda rule is strictly follows but manipulation is possible. The paper shows that this type of manipulation is vulnerable. Both single and simultaneous vulnerabilities of cloning manipulations are discussed with detail calculations and easier ways.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Borda voting is non-manipulable but cloning manipulation is possible |
English Title: | Borda voting is non-manipulable but cloning manipulation is possible |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Borda scores, cloning manipulation, vulnerabilities in Borda cloning manipulations. |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C65 - Miscellaneous Mathematical Tools |
Item ID: | 50848 |
Depositing User: | Haradhan Kumar Mohajan |
Date Deposited: | 22 Oct 2013 06:27 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 12:47 |
References: | Arrow, K. J. (1963), Social Choice and Individual Values. 2nd ed. Wiley, New York. Borda, J. C. (1781), M moiré sur les lections au Scrutin, Historie de l’Academie Royale des Sciences, Paris. Black, D. (1948), On the Rational of Group Decision Making: Journal of Political Economy, 56: 23-34. Black, D. (1958), Theory of Committees and Elections. Cambridge. Dummett, M. (1998), The Borda Count and Agenda Manipulation: Social Choice and Welfare, 15: 289-296. Gibbard, A. F. (1973), Manipulation of Voting Schemes: a General Result, Econometrica 41: 587-601. Huang, H. C. and Chua, V. C. H. (2000), Analytical Representation of Probabilities under the IAC Condition: Social Choice and Welfare, 17: 143-155. Islam, J. N.; Mohajan, H. K. and Moolio, P. (2009), Political Economy and Social Welfare with Voting Procedure: KASBIT Business Journal, 2(1&2): 42-66. Islam, J. N.; Mohajan, H. K. and Moolio, P. (2011), Method of Voting System and Manipulation of Voting: International Journal of Management and Transformation, Brown Walker Press 23331 Water Circle, Boca Raton, FL 33486-8540, USA. 5(1): 10-34. Web: www.brownwalker.com/ASMT-journals.php Satterthwaite, M. A. (1975), Strategy-Proofness and Arrow’s Conditions: Journal of Economic Theory, 10: 198-217. Serais, J. (2002), Cloning Manipulation of the Borda Rule, Meeting SCW, GEMMA-CRÈME, University of Caen, France. Truchon, M. (2006), Borda and the Maximum Likelihood Approach to Vote Aggragation: Centrec de Recherche 06-23, interuniversitaire sur le risqué, les politiques economiques et l’emploi (CIRPEE). Zahid, M. A. and de Swart, H. (2010), The Borda Majority Count. (Unpublished Manuscript). |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/50848 |