The influence of information sources on inter- and intra-firm diffusion: evidence from UK farming

Waters, James (2013): The influence of information sources on inter- and intra-firm diffusion: evidence from UK farming.

Abstract

We study the effect of different information sources on diffusion between and within companies. Our model of economically optimising farmers replicates results from dual process persuasion theory, and predicts that inter-firm diffusion will be primarily affected by reliable, easily accessible information while intra-firm diffusion will be influenced by technical information. The results are tested on UK farming data. Consistent with our model, information from agents, suppliers, farmers, and agricultural magazines influences inter-firm adoption, from buyers influences intra-firm adoption, and from crop consultants, academics, government, and an industry body influences both.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Innovation; Intra-firm diffusion; Information acquisition; Organic farming; Dual process persuasion theory
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D83 - Search ; Learning ; Information and Knowledge ; Communication ; Belief ; Unawareness; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q12 - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q16 - R&D ; Agricultural Technology ; Biofuels ; Agricultural Extension Services

References

Aldana, U., Foltz, J.D., Barham, B.L., Useche, P., 2011. Sequential adoption of package technologies: The dynamics of stacked trait corn adoption. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 93, 130-43.

Anderson, J.R., Feder, G., 2004. Agricultural Extension: Good Intentions and Hard Realities. World Bank Research Observer 19, 41-60.

Angst, C.M., Agarwal, R., 2009. Adoption of Electronic Health Records in the Presence of Privacy Concerns: The Elaboration Likelihood Model and Individual Persuasion. MIS Quarterly 33, 339-70.

Baerenklau, K.A., 2005. Toward an Understanding of Technology Adoption: Risk, Learning, and Neighborhood Effects. Land Economics 81, 1-19.

Bailey, A. (principal investigator), 2009. Re-Bugging the System: Promoting Adoption of Alternative Pest Management Strategies in Field Crop Systems. ESRC End of Award Report, RES-224-25-0093-A. Swindon: ESRC

Bailey, A. (2012). Re-Bugging the System: Promoting Adoption of Alternative Pest Management Strategies in Field Crop Systems, 2005-2009. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive, SN: 6960 (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-6960-1)

Bailey, A.S., Bertaglia, M., Fraser, I.M., Sharma, A. Douarin, E., 2009. Integrated Pest Management Portfolios in UK Arable Farming: Results of a farmer survey. Pest management Science 65, 1030-9

Bandiera, O., Rasul, I., 2006. Social Networks and Technology Adoption in Northern Mozambique. Economic Journal 116, 869-902.

Battisti, G., Canepa, A., Stoneman, P., 2009. e-Business usage across and within firms in the UK: profitability, externalities, and policy. Research Policy 38, 133-43.

Battisti, G., Hollenstein, H., Stoneman, P. Woerter, M., 2007. Inter and intra firm diffusion of ICT in the United Kingdom (UK) and Switzerland (CH): An internationally comparative study based on firm-level data. Economics of Innovation & New Technology 16, 669-87.

Battisti, G., Iona, A., 2009. The intra-firm diffusion of complementary innovations: Evidence from the adoption of management practices by British establishments. Research Policy 38, 1326-39.

Battisti, G., Stoneman, P., 2003. Inter- and intra-firm effects in the diffusion of new process technology. Research Policy 32, 1641-55.

Battisti, G., Stoneman, P., 2005. The intra-firm diffusion of new process technologies. International Journal of Industrial Organization 23, 1-22.

Bhattacherjee, A., Sanford, C., 2006. Influence Processes for Information Technology Acceptance: An Elaboration Likelihood Model. MIS Quarterly 30, 806-26.

Bhattacherjee, A., Sanford, C., 2009. The intention-behaviour gap in technology usage: the moderating role of attitude strength. Behaviour & Information Technology 28, 389-401.

Chaiken, S., 1980. Heuristic Versus Systematic Information Processing and the Use of Source Versus Message Cues in Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39, 752-66.

Chen, S., Chaiken, S., 1999. The Heuristic-Systematic Model in Its Broader Context, in: Chaiken, S., Trope, Y. (Eds), Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology, Guilford Press, New York, pp. 73-96

Conley, T., Udry, C., 2001. Social Learning through Networks: The Adoption of New Agricultural Technologies in Ghana. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83, 668-73.

Conley, T.G., Udry, C.R., 2010. Learning about a New Technology: Pineapple in Ghana. American Economic Review 100, 35-69.

Evenson, R.E., 2001. Economic impacts of agricultural research and extension, in: Landau, R., Rosenberg, N. (Eds), Handbook of Agricultural Economics, Volume 1. Elsevier, 573-628

Foltz, J., Lanclos, K., Guenthner, J., Makus, L., Sanchez, W., 1996. The Market for Information and Consultants in Idaho Agriculture. Agribusiness 12, 569-81.

Foster, A.D., Rosenzweig, M.R., 1995. Learning by Doing and Learning from Others: Human Capital and Technical Change in Agriculture. Journal of Political Economy 103, 1176-209.

Fuentelsaz, L., Gomez, J., Polo, Y., 2003. Intrafirm diffusion of new technologies: an empirical application. Research Policy 32, 533-51.

Garcia-Jimenez, C.I., Mishra, A.K., Paxton, K.W., Lambert, D.M., Velandia, M., Rejesus, R., Segarra, E., 2011. The Relevance of Information Sources on Adoption of Precision Farming Technologies by Cotton Producers. Selected Paper prepared for presentation at the Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Corpus Christi, TX, February 5-8, 2011.

Genius, M., Pantzios, C.J., Tzouvelekas, V., 2006. Information Acquisition and Adoption of Organic Farming Practices. Journal of Agricultural and Resources Economics 31, 93-113.

Gloy, B.A., Akridge, J.T., Whipker, L.D., 2000. Sources of information for commercial farms: usefulness of media and personal sources. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 3, 245-60.

Grossman, S.J., Kihlstrom, R.E., Mirman, L.J., 1997. A Bayesian Approach to the Production of Information and Learning by Doing. Review of Economic Studies 44, 533-47.

Hollenstein, H., Woerter, M., 2008. Inter- and intra-firm diffusion of technology: The example of E-commerce: An analysis based on Swiss firm-level data. Research Policy 37, 545-64.

Johnson, B.T., Eagly, A.H., 1989. Effects of Involvement on Persuasion: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin 106, 290-314.

Khanna, M., 2001. Sequential Adoption of Site-Specific Technologies and Its Implications for Nitrogen Productivity: A Double Selectivity Model. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83, 35-51.

Kihlstrom, R.E., 1976. Firm Demand for Information about Price and Technology. Journal of Political Economy 84, 1335-41.

Koundouri, P., Nauges, C., Tzouvelekas, V., 2006. Technology Adoption under Production Uncertainty: Theory and Application to Irrigation Technology. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88, 657-670.

Kruglanski, A.W., Thompson, E.P., 1999. Persuasion by a Single Route. A View From the Unimodel. Psychological Inquiry 10, 83-109.

Lapple, D., Van Rensberg, T., 2011. Adoption of organic farming: Are there differences between early and late adoption? Ecological Economics 70, 1406-14.

Leathers, H.D., Smale, M., 1991. A Bayesian Approach to Explaining Sequential Adoption of Components of a Technological Package. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73, 734-42.

Mansfield, E., 1968. Industrial research and technological innovation: an econometric analysis. New York: Norton.

Marrano, M.G., Haskel, J., 2006. How Much Does the UK Invest in Intangible Assets? Queen Mary University of London Working Paper No. 578.

Moser, S., Mosler, H.-J., 2008. Differences in influence patterns between groups predicting the adoption of a solar disinfection technology for drinking water in Bolivia. Social Science & Medicine 67, 497-504.

Ortmann, G.F., Patrick, G.F., Musser, W.N., Doster, D.H., 1993. Use of Private Consultants and Other Sources of Information by Large Cornbelt Farmers. Agribusiness 9, 391-402.

Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T., 1986. The Elaboration Likelihood Model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 19, 123-62.

Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., Schumann, D., 1983. Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement. Journal of Consumer Research 10, 135-46.

Petty, R.E., Wegener D.T., 1999. The Elaboration Likelihood Model: Current Status and Controversies, in: Chaiken, S., Trope, Y. (Eds), Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology, Guilford Press, New York, pp. 73-96

Stoneman, P., 1981. Intra-firm Diffusion, Bayesian Learning and Profitability. The Economic Journal 91, 375-88.

Stoneman, P.L. and David, P.A. (1986). Adoption subsidies vs Information Provision as Instruments of Technology Policy. Economic Journal, 96, Supplement: Conference Papers, 142-50.

Wolf, S., Just, D., Zilberman, D., 2001. Between data and decisions: the organization of agricultural economic information systems. Research Policy 30, 121-41.

Wozniak, G.D., 1987. Human Capital, Information, and the Early Adoption of New Technology. Journal of Human Resources 22, 101-112.

Wozniak, G.D., 1993. Joint Information Acquisition and New Technology Adoption: Late Versus Early Adoption. Review of Economics and Statistics 75, 438-45.

Yaron, D., Dinar, A., Voet, H., 1992. Innovations on Family Farms: The Nazareth Region in Israel. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74, 361-70.

Young, H.P., 2009. Innovation Diffusion in Heterogeneous Populations: Contagion, Social Influence, and Social Learning. American Economic Review 99, 1899-924.