Niu, Zilong (2013): Relative Performance Concerns, Attention Allocation and Complementarities in Information Acquisition.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_51194.pdf Download (270kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This article studies how relative performance concerns affect institutional investors' information choices in the context of a multi-security market. I show that due to relative performance concerns and learning capacity constraint, institutional investors tend to acquire the same piece of information and the same asset as their peers. I also show that the change of distribution of capacity constraint can affect the price efficiency and cost of capital, but only through its effect on investors' average capacity constraint.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Relative Performance Concerns, Attention Allocation and Complementarities in Information Acquisition |
English Title: | Relative Performance Concerns, Attention Allocation and Complementarities in Information Acquisition |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | relative performance concerns, attention allocation, complementarities in information acquisition |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D82 - Asymmetric and Private Information ; Mechanism Design G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G14 - Information and Market Efficiency ; Event Studies ; Insider Trading G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services > G23 - Non-bank Financial Institutions ; Financial Instruments ; Institutional Investors |
Item ID: | 51194 |
Depositing User: | Zilong Niu |
Date Deposited: | 05 Nov 2013 14:37 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 14:00 |
References: | Abel, A.B., 1990. Asset prices under habit formation and catching up with the joneses. The American Economic Review 80, 38–42. Admati, A.R., 1985. A noisy rational expectations equilibrium for multi-asset securities markets. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society , 629–657. Andrei, D., 2010. International portfolio choice and relative wealth concerns. Avdis, E., 2012. Information trade-offs in dynamic financial markets. Available at SSRN 2022557 . Barlevy, G., Veronesi, P., 2007. Information acquisition in financial markets: a correction. Technical Report. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. Bikhchandani, S., Sharma, S., 2000. Herd behavior in financial markets. IMF Staff papers , 279–310. Chevalier, J., Ellison, G., 1997. Risk taking by mutual funds as a response to incentives. Journal of Political Economy 105, 1167–1200.16 Choi, N., Sias, R.W., 2009. Institutional industry herding. Journal of Financial Economics 94, 469–491. Easley, D., O’hara, M., 2004. Information and the cost of capital. The journal of finance 59, 1553–1583. Froot, K.A., Scharfstein, D.S., Stein, J.C., 1992. Herd on the street: Informational inefficiencies in a market with short-term speculation. The Journal of Finance 47, 1461–1484. Gali, J., 1994. Keeping up with the joneses: Consumption externalities, portfolio choice, and asset prices. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 26, 1–8. Garcia, D., Strobl, G., 2011. Relative wealth concerns and complementarities in information acquisition. Review of Financial Studies 24, 169–207. Gümbel, A., 2005. Herding in delegated portfolio management: When is comparative performance information desirable? European Economic Review 49, 599–626. Hellwig, C., Veldkamp, L., 2009. Knowing what others know: Coordination motives in information acquisition. The Review of Economic Studies 76, 223–251. Hellwig, M.F., 1980. On the aggregation of information in competitive markets. Journal of economic theory 22, 477–498. Hirshleifer, D., Hong Teoh, S., 2003. Herd behaviour and cascading in capital markets: A review and synthesis. European Financial Management 9, 25–66. Holmstrom, B., 1982. Moral hazard in teams. The Bell Journal of Economics, 324–340. Kyle, A.S., 1985. Continuous auctions and insider trading. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society , 1315–1335. Lambert, R.A., Leuz, C., Verrecchia, R.E., 2012. Information asymmetry, information precision, and the cost of capital. Review of Finance 16, 1–29. 17 Maug, E., Naik, N.Y., 1996. Herding and delegated portfolio management: The impact of relative performance evaluation on asset allocation. Institute of Finance and Accounting, London Business School. Mondria, J., 2010. Portfolio choice, attention allocation, and price comovement. Journal of Economic Theory 145, 1837–1864. Palomino, F., 2005. Relative performance objectives in financial markets. Journal of Financial Intermediation 14, 351–375. Peress, J., 2004. Wealth, information acquisition, and portfolio choice. Review of Financial Studies 17, 879–914. Sias, R.W., 2004. Institutional herding. Review of Financial Studies 17, 165–206. Sirri, E.R., Tufano, P., 1998. Costly search and mutual fund flows. The journal of finance 53, 1589–1622. Van Nieuwerburgh, S., Veldkamp, L., 2009. Information immobility and the home bias puzzle. The Journal of Finance 64, 1187–1215. Van Nieuwerburgh, S., Veldkamp, L., 2010. Information acquisition and under-diversification. The Review of Economic Studies 77, 779–805. Veldkamp, L.L., 2006. Media frenzies in markets for financial information. The American economic review , 577–601. Veldkamp, L.L., 2011. Information choice in macroeconomics and finance. Princeton University Press. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/51194 |