Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont (2013): The Ideal Economy: A Prototype.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_51582.pdf Download (448kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Standard economics starts with behavioral assumptions that are formally expressed as axioms. This approach met with little scientific success but still enjoys some popularity for lack of a convincing alternative. To replace the subjective formal foundations by objective structural axioms is the first task of this paper. To give a correct account of how the monetary economy works is the second. This entails an explanation of the continuous clearing of both the product and the labor market in the random consumption economy, that is, of how the economy could establish ongoing full employment and price stability in principle.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Ideal Economy: A Prototype |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | new framework of concepts; structure-centric; axiom set; consumption economy; Profit Law; directed random changes; complexity; simulation; market clearing; budget balancing; product market; labor market |
Subjects: | B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B59 - Other C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C63 - Computational Techniques ; Simulation Modeling E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E1 - General Aggregative Models > E19 - Other |
Item ID: | 51582 |
Depositing User: | Egmont Kakarot-Handtke |
Date Deposited: | 19 Nov 2013 15:02 |
Last Modified: | 09 Oct 2019 11:33 |
References: | Ackerman, F. (2004). Still Dead After All These Years: Interpreting the Failure of General Equilibrium Theory. In F. Ackerman, and A. Nadal (Eds.), The Flawed Foundations of General Equilibrium, pages 14–32. London, New York, NY: Routledge. Arrow, K. J., and Debreu, G. (1954). Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy. Econometrica, 22(3): 265–290. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/1907353. Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1979). Methods in Economic Science. Journal of Economic Issues, 13(2): 317–328. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/4224809. Hahn, F. H. (1984). Equilibrium and Macroeconomics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Hausman, D. M. (1992). The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kakarot-Handtke, E. (2011a). Reconstructing the Quantity Theory (I). SSRN Working Paper Series, 1895268: 1–26. URL http://ssrn.com/abstract=1895268. Kakarot-Handtke, E. (2011b). Reconstructing the Quantity Theory (II). SSRN Working Paper Series, 1903663: 1–19. URL http://ssrn.com/abstract=1903663. Kakarot-Handtke, E. (2012). Primary and Secondary Markets. Levy Economics Institute Working Papers, 741: 1–27. URL http://www.levyinstitute.org/publications/?docid=1654. Kakarot-Handtke, E. (2013a). Redemption and Depression. SSRN Working Paper Series, 2343561: 1–28. URL http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2343561. Kakarot-Handtke, E. (2013b). Walras’s Law of Markets as Special Case of the General Period Core Theorem. SSRN Working Paper Series, 2222123: 1–11. URL http://ssrn.com/abstract=2222123. Kakarot-Handtke, E. (2013c). Why Post Keynesianism is Not Yet a Science. Economic Analysis and Policy, 43(1): 97–106. URL http://www.eap-journal.com/archive/v43_i1_06-Kakarot-Handtke.pdf. Keen, S. (2011). Debunking Economics. London, New York, NY: Zed Books, rev. edition. Kirkenfeld, T. (1948). The Paradox of Profit. Science & Society, 12(1): 33–41. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/40399873. Kirman, A. (1997). The Evolution of Economic Theory. In A. d’Autume, and J. Cartelier (Eds.), Is Economics Becoming a Hard Science?, pages 92–107. Cheltenham, Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar. Kreuzenkamp, H. A., and McAleer, M. (1995). Simplicity, Scientific Inference and Econometric Modeling. Economic Journal, 105: 1–21. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/2235317. McKenzie, L. W. (2008). General Equilibrium. In S. N. Durlauf, and L. E. Blume (Eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics Online, pages 1–18. Palgrave Macmillan, 2nd edition. URL http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde2008_G000023. Mill, J. S. (2006). A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive. Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation, volume 7 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund. (1843). Poincaré, H. (2007). Science and Method. New York, NY: Cosimo. (1914). Quiggin, J. (2010). Zombie Economics. How Dead Ideas Still Walk Among Us. Princeton, NJ, Oxford: Princeton University Press. Schumpeter, J. A. (1994). History of Economic Analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Wolfram, S. (2002). A New Kind of Science. Champaign, IL: Wolfram Media. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/51582 |