Growth is (really) good for the (really) rich

Campos-Vazquez, Raymundo M. and Chavez, Emmanuel and Esquivel, Gerardo (2013): Growth is (really) good for the (really) rich.

Abstract

This paper analyzes the relationship between mean income and the income of the rich. Our methodology closely follows that of Dollar and Kraay (2002), but instead of looking at the bottom of the distribution, we analyze the top. We use panel data from the World Top Incomes database, which collects top income data from several countries using tax returns as the raw source. We define the “rich” as earners in the top 10 percent, 1 percent, 0.1 percent, and 0.01 percent of the income distribution. We find that economic growth is good for the rich in the sense that the mean income of the top decile of the distribution grows in the same proportion as that of the whole population. However, we also find that the income of earners in the top percentile of the distribution and above grows in an even larger proportion than average income: that is, economic growth is really good for the really rich. We also find that during economic downturns, the average income of top earners responds proportionally less to changes in mean income than during economic expansions. Our results are robust to different sample specifications.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Growth, Income distribution; Inequality; Top Income; Rich.
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution > D31 - Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E0 - General > E01 - Measurement and Data on National Income and Product Accounts and Wealth ; Environmental Accounts; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I30 - General; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O40 - General

References

Alvaredo, F., Atkinson, A. B., Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2013). The top 1 percent in international and historical perspective. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(3), 3-20.

Alvaredo, F., Atkinson, A. B., Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2013b). The World Top Incomes Database. http://topincomes.g-mond.parisschoolofeconomics.eu/.

Andrews, D., Jencks, C., & Leigh, A. (2011). Do rising top incomes lift all boats? The BE Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 11(1), 1-43.

Atkinson, A. B. (2002). Top incomes in the United Kingdom over the twentieth century. Discussion Paper in Economic and Social History, no. 43.

Atkinson, A. B. (2007). Measuring Top Incomes: Methodological Issues. In Atkinson A. B., & Piketty T. (Eds.). Top incomes over the twentieth century: A contrast between continental European and English-speaking countries. Chapter 2, pp. 18-42. Oxford University Press.

Atkinson, A. B., & Leigh, A. (2007). The distribution of top incomes in Australia. Economic Record, 83(262), 247-261.

Atkinson A. B., & Piketty T. (Eds.). (2007). Top incomes over the twentieth century: A contrast between continental European and English-speaking countries. Oxford University Press.

Atkinson A. B., & Piketty T. (Eds.). (2010). Top incomes: A global perspective. Oxford University Press.

Atkinson, A. B., Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2011). Top incomes in the long run of history. Journal of Economic Literature, 49(1), 3-71.

Basu, K. (2013). Shared prosperity and the mitigation of poverty. In practice and in precept. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, no. 6700, November.

Bivens, J., & Mishel, L. (2013). The pay of corporate executives and financial professionals as evidence of rents in top 1 percent incomes. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(3), 57-78.

Burkhauser, R. V., Hahn, M. H., & Wilkins, R. (2013). Measuring top incomes using tax record data: A cautionary tale from Australia. Unpublished manuscript.

Chinn, M. D., & Ito, H. (2008). A New Measure of Financial Openness. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 10(3), 309-322.

Corak, M. (2013). Income inequality, equality of opportunity, and intergenerational mobility. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(3), 79-102.

Dollar, D., Kleineberg, T., & Kraay, A. (2013). Growth still is good for the poor. Policy Research Working Paper 6568,

Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. (2002). Growth is good for the poor. Journal of Economic Growth, 7(3), 195-225.

Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. (2002 b). Growth is good for the poor: A response to Lubker, Smith and Weeks. Unpublished manuscript.

Feenberg, D. R., & Poterba, J. M. (1993). Income inequality and the incomes of very high-income taxpayers: Evidence from tax returns. In J. Poterba (Ed.), Tax policy and the economy (pp. 145-177) MIT Press.

Foster, J., & Szekely, M. (2000). How good is growth? Asian Development Review, 18(2), 59-73.

Foster, J. E., & Szekely, M. (2008). Is economic growth good for the poor? Tracking low incomes using general means. International Economic Review, 49(4), 1143-1172.

Gallup, J., Radelet, S., & Warner, A. (1998). Economic growth and the income of the poor. CAER II, Discussion Paper no. 36,

Goolsbee, A. (2000). What happens when you tax the rich? evidence from executive compensation. Journal of Political Economy, 108(2), 352-378.

Goolsbee, A., Hall, R. E., & Katz, L. F. (1999). Evidence on the high-income Laffer curve from six decades of tax reform. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1999(2), 1-64.

Heston, A., Summers, R. & Aten, B. (2012). Penn World Table Version 7.1. Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices at the University of Pennsylvania URL http://pwt.econ.upenn.edu/.

Hungerford, T. (2011). Changes in the distribution of income among tax filers between 1996 and 2006: The role of labor income, capital income, and tax policy. Congressional Research Service, 1-18.

Hungerford, T. (2012). Taxes and the economy: An economic analysis of the top tax rates since 1945. Congressional Research Service, 1-20.

Kuznets, S. (1953). Shares of upper income groups in income and savings. National Bureau of Economic Research.

Lübker, M., Smith, G., & Weeks, J. (2002). Growth and the poor: A comment on Dollar and Kraay. Journal of International Development, 14(5), 555-571.

Piketty, T. (2001). Les hauts revenus en france au 20e siècle: Inégalités et redistribution, 1901–1998. Paris: Bernard Gasset.

Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2003). Income inequality in the United States, 1913-1998. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 1-39.

Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2006). The evolution of top incomes: A historical and international perspective. American Economic Review, 96(2), 200-200.

Piketty, T., Saez, E. & Stantcheva, S. (2011) Optimal labor income taxation: A tale of three elasticities. NBER Working Paper no. 17616.

Piketty, T., & Zucman, G. (2013). Capital is back: Wealth-income ratios in rich countries, 1700-2010. CEPR Discussion Paper no. DP9588, 1-42.

Roemer, M., & Gugerty, M. (1997). Does economic growth reduce poverty? CAER II, Discussion Paper no. 4.

Saez, E. (2001). Using elasticities to derive optimal income tax rates. The Review of Economic Studies, 68(1), 205-229.

Saez, E. (2012). Striking it richer: The evolution of top incomes in the United States. Unpublished manuscript.

Saez, E. (2013). Striking it richer: The evolution of top incomes in the United States. Real World Economics Review, 65, 120-129.

World Bank. (2013). http://databank.worldbank.org/data/home.aspx.