A Method for Experimental Events that Break Cointegration: Counterfactual Simulation

Bell, Peter N (2014): A Method for Experimental Events that Break Cointegration: Counterfactual Simulation.

Abstract

In this paper I develop a method to estimate the effect of an event on a time series variable. The event is framed in a quasi-experimental setting with time series observations on a treatment variable, which is affected by the event, and a control variable, which is not. Prior to the event, the two variables are cointegrated. After the event, they are not. Since the event only affects the treatment variable, the method uses observations on the control variable after the event and the distribution of difference in differences before the event to simulate values for the treatment variable as-if the event did not occur; hence the name counterfactual simulation. I describe theoretical properties of the method and show the method in action with purpose-built data.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Quasi-experiment, cointegration, time series, counterfactual, simulation
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C15 - Statistical Simulation Methods: General; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C32 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes ; State Space Models; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C63 - Computational Techniques ; Simulation Modeling; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C90 - General

References

Angrist, J.D. & Pischk, J.S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Bell, P. (2014). Farmland Ownership Restrictions: Between a Rock and a Hard Place. Unpublished manuscript. University of Victoria, Canada. Retrieved from http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/53033/

Engle, R.F. & Granger, C.W.J. (1987). Cointegration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55, 251—276.

Gregory, A.W. & Hansen, B.E. (1996). Residual-based tests for cointegration in models with regime shifts. Journal of Econometrics, 70(1), 99—126.

Maddala, G.S. & Kin, In-Moo (1998). Unit Roots, Cointegration, and Structural Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

McCloskey, D., Ziliak S.T. (1996). The Standard Error of Regressions. Journal of Economic Literature, 34, 97–114.

Peters, O. (2011a). The time resolution of the St. Petersburg paradox. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 369(1956). 4913-4931.

Peters, O. (2011b). Menger 1934 Revisited. Unpublished manuscript, Imperial College London. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.1578

Upper, C. (2007). Using Counterfactual simulations to assess the danger of contagion in interbank markets. BIS Working Paper No. 234. Retrieved from http://www.bis.org/publ/work234.pdf