How students' exogenous characteristics affect faculties’ inefficiency. A heteroscedastic stochastic frontier approach

Zotti, Roberto and Barra, Cristian (2014): How students' exogenous characteristics affect faculties’ inefficiency. A heteroscedastic stochastic frontier approach.

Abstract

By using a heteroscedastic stochastic frontier model, this paper focuses on how students' exogenous characteristics (such as personal demographic information, pre-enrollment educational background and household economic status) affect faculties’ inefficiency. Using individual data on freshmen enrolled at a public owned university in Italy over the 2002-2008 period, we focus both on the direction of this influence on technical inefficiency and on the magnitude of the related partial effects. A measure of R2 has also been calculated in order to evaluate the overall explanatory power of the exogenous variables used. The empirical evidence reveals the validity of the heteroscedastic assumption, giving credit to the use of some students’ individual characteristics according to which the inefficiency is allowed to change. Moreover, the estimates suggest that the university could improve the students’ performances by investing in labour inputs.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Stochastic frontier analysis; Technical inefficiency estimates; Heteroscedasticity; Higher education.
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C14 - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C67 - Input-Output Models; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I21 - Analysis of Education; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I23 - Higher Education ; Research Institutions

References

References

Aigner, D., Lovell, K. and Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 6, 21–37.

Arulampalam, W., Naylor, R. A. and Smith, J. P. (2004). A hazard model of the probability of medical school drop-out in the UK. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 167 (1), 157-178.

Banker, R.D., Charnes, A. and Cooper, W.W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in DEA. Management Science, 32, 1613-1627.

Battese, G.E. and Corra, G. (1977). Estimation of a production frontier model: with application to the pastoral zone of Eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 21, 169-179.

Battese, G.E. and Coelli, T.J. (1995). A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics, 20, 325-332.

Bera, A.K. and Sharma, S.C. (1999), Estimating production uncertainty in stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 12, 187-210.

Boero G., McNight, A., Naylor, R. and Smith, J. (2001). Graduates and graduate labour markets in the UK and Italy. Lavoro e Relazioni Industriali, 2, 131-172.

Carneiro, P. and Heckman, J.J. (2005). The evidence on credit constraints in post-secondary schooling. Economic Journal, 112, 705-734.

Caudill, S., Ford, J. and Gropper, D. (1995). Frontier estimation and firm-specific inefficiency measures in the presence of heteroscedasticity. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 13 (1), 105-111.

Cazals, C., Florens, J.P. and Simar, L. (2002). Nonparametric frontier estimation: a robust approach. Journal of Econometrics, 106, 1–25.

Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. and Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444.

Checchi, D., Fiorio, V. and Leonardi, M. (2013). Intergenerational persistence in educational attainment in Italy. Economic Letters, 118 (1), 229-232.

Coelli T, Rao, D.S.P. and Battese, G.E. (1998). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M. and Zhu, J. (2004). Handbook on data envelopment analysis. Springer: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

DesJardins, S. L., Ahlburg, D. A. and McCall, B. (2002). A temporal investigation of factors related to timely degree completion. The Journal of Higher Education, 73 (5), 555-581.

Farrel, M.J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, 120, 253-290.

Ferrari, G. and Laureti, T. (2005). Evaluating the technical efficiency of human capital formation in the Italian University: Evidence from Florence. Statistical Methods and Applications, 14(2), 243–270.

Hadri, K. (1999). Estimation of a doubly heteroscedastic stochastic frontier cost function. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 17 (3), 359-363.

Kumbhakar, S.C. and Lovell, C.A.K. (2000). Stochastic Frontier Analysis, New York, Cambridge University Press.

Lassibille, G. (2011). Student progress in higher education: what we have learned from large-scale studies. The Open Education Journal, 4, 1-8.

Laureti, T. (2008). Modelling exogenous variables in human capital formation through a heteroscedastic stochastic frontier. International Advances in Economic Research, 14 (1), 76–89.

Lewin, A.Y. and Lovell, C.A.K. (1990). Frontier analysis: parametric and nonparametric approaches. Journal of Econometrics, 46, 1-245.

Liu, Y. and Myers, R. (2009). Model selection in stochastic frontier analysis with an application to maize production in Kenya. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 31 (1), 33-46.

Meeusen, W. and Van den Broeck, J. (1977). Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error. International Economic Review, 18, 435-444.

Ramanathan, R. (2003). An Introduction to data envelopment analysis: a tool for performance measurement. New Delhi: Sage Publications India Private Ltd.

Smith, J. and Naylor, R. (2001). Determinants of degree performance in UK universities: A statistical analysis of the 1993 student cohort. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 63, 29–60.

Thanassoulis, E. (2001). Introduction to the theory and application of data envelopment analysis. Norwell, Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publisher.

Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: a theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45 (1), 89-125.

Tyagi, P., Yadav, S. P. and Singh, S. P. (2009). Relative performance of academic departments using DEA with sensitivity analysis. Evaluation and Program Planning 32, 168-177.

Wang, H. J. (2002). Heteroscedasticity and non-monotonic efficiency effects of a Stochastic Frontier Model. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 18 (3), 241-253.

Wang, H. J. (2003). A stochastic frontier analysis of financing constraints on investment: the case of financial liberalization in Taiwan. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 21, 406–419.

Zoghbi, A.C., Rocha, F. and Mattos, E. (2013). Education production efficiency: Evidence from Brazilian universities. Economic Modelling, 31, 94–103.