Azzoni, Carlos Roberto and Brooks, Jonathan and Guilhoto, Joaquim José Martins and McDonald, Scott (2007): Who in Brazil will gain from global trade reforms? Published in: World Economy , Vol. 30, No. 10 (October 2007): pp. 1568-1593.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_54510.pdf Download (214kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The potential impacts of multilateral trade liberalisation on developing countries are the subject of numerous controversies. One particular concern is that Brazil, a major agricultural exporter and a country with one of the world’s most unequal income distributions, will reap a substantial share of the potential benefits to developing countries from agricultural trade reform, and that most of those benefits will go to large scale commercial farmers rather than the country’s smallholders. This claim is explored via a global general equilibrium model and a national model of Brazil containing multiple agricultural and non-agricultural households. Brazil is found to account for nearly one-half of all the benefits to developing countries deriving from global agricultural trade reform. These gains are associated with improvements in the welfare of each group and a lower incidence of poverty. Large scale producers gain more than smallholders as they tend to be relatively specialised in export products, but there are important gains to agricultural employees, who are relatively poor, and to urban households, who benefit from the expansion of the agro-food sector. Overall, there is no discernible impact on income inequality, and no evidence that the gains to commercial farmers occur at the expense of poorer households.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Who in Brazil will gain from global trade reforms? |
English Title: | Who in Brazil will gain from global trade reforms? |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Brazil, trade liberalisation, poverty, inequality, agriculture |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F10 - General Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q0 - General Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q0 - General > Q00 - General R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R15 - Econometric and Input-Output Models ; Other Models |
Item ID: | 54510 |
Depositing User: | Joaquim José Martins Guilhoto |
Date Deposited: | 19 Mar 2014 08:36 |
Last Modified: | 30 Sep 2019 06:19 |
References: | Anderson, K. and W. Martin and D. van der Mensbrugghe (2005), “Market and Welfare Impacts of Doha Reform Scenarios,” Chapter 12 in Agricultural Trade Reform and the Doha Development Agenda, edited by Will Martin and Kym Anderson, The World Bank, Washington, DC, forthcoming. FAO–INCRA (2000), “Novo Retrato da Agricultura Familiar: O Brasil Redescoberto”, MDA/INCRA, Brasília. Bento, J. And M. Horridge (2005), “The Doha Round, Poverty and Regional Inequality in Brazil”, Putting Development Back into the Doha Agenda: Poverty Impacts of a WTO, Hertel T. and A. Winters eds., the World Bank, Washington D.C. FIPE (2004), “The Distributional Effects of Agricultural Policy Reform: The Case of Brazil”, report prepared for OECD, 2004, São Paulo. González-Rivera, G. and S.M. Helfand (2001), “The Extent, Pattern, and Degree of Market Integration: A Multivariate Approach for the Brazilian Rice Market”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 83(3), pp. 576-592. Harrison, G.W., T.F. Rutherford, D.G. Tarr, and A. Gurgel (2004), “Trade Policy and Poverty Reduction in Brazil”, The World Bank Economic Review, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 289-317. Hertel, T.W. et al. (2003), “Multilateral Trade Liberalisation and Poverty in Brazil and Chile”, Économie internationale, Vol 94-95, pp.201-233. INCRA (National Institute for Colonization and Agrarian Reform) (2005), “II National Reform Plan – Brazil”, Special Edition to the World Social Forum 2005. Madeley, J. (2000), Hungry for Trade: How the Poor Pay for Free Trade, Zed Publishing Ltd. McDonald, S. (2005a), ‘A Standard Computable General Equilibrium Model Version 5: Technical Documentation’, PROVIDE Project Technical Paper 2005:03. Elsenburg, RSA. McDonald, S. (2005b), “Global Trade Liberalisation and Brazil; A Single Country Computable General Equilibrium Analysis”, background paper prepared for OECD, 2005. Narlikan A. and D. Tussie (2004), “Bargaining Together in Cancún: Developing Countries and Their Evolving Coalitions”, World Economy, Volume 27, Issue 7, Page 947-966. OECD (2005a), Global, national and household level effects of trade and agricultural policy reform. OECD (2005b), OECD Review of Agricultural Policies: Brazil, OECD, Paris. Tangermann S. (2005), “OECD Area Agricultural Policies and the Interests of Developing Countries”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 87, No. 5, pp. 1128-1144. Valdés A. and A. McCalla (1999), “Issues, Interests and Options of Developing Countries,” presented at the joint World Bank and WTO Conference on Agriculture and the New Trade Agenda in the WTO 2000 Negotiations, October 1-2, 1999, Geneva, Switzerland. 15 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/54510 |