Cebula, Richard and Foley, Maggie (2011): A Panel Data Study of the Effects of Economic Freedom, Regulatory Quality, and Taxation on the Growth Rate of Per Capita Real GDP. Published in: Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice , Vol. 30, No. 1-3 (27 December 2012): pp. 103-122.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_54703.pdf Download (347kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This study empirically investigates three hypotheses. The first is that higher levels of economic freedom in an economy promote a higher growth rate of economic activity and hence yield a higher growth rate of per capita real GDP in that economy. The second hypothesis is that higher quality government regulation leads to a more efficient economic system, in large part by interfering less with market functioning and in part by not adding unnecessarily to the cost of conducting business in the marketplace, and thereby leads to a higher per capita real GDP growth rate. The third hypothesis is that the higher the taxation level/burden relative to GDP in an economy, the lower the growth rate of private sector spending and hence the lower the growth rate of per capita real GDP in that economy. Using a panel dataset for OECD nations over the 2003 through 2006 period, fixed effects PLS estimations find compelling evidence in support of all three of these hypotheses.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | A Panel Data Study of the Effects of Economic Freedom, Regulatory Quality, and Taxation on the Growth Rate of Per Capita Real GDP |
English Title: | A Panel Data Study of the Effects of Economic Freedom, Regulatory Quality, and Taxation on the Growth Rate of Per Capita Real GDP |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | economic growth; economic freedom; quality regulation; tax burdens |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D78 - Positive Analysis of Policy Formulation and Implementation H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H24 - Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H25 - Business Taxes and Subsidies K - Law and Economics > K2 - Regulation and Business Law > K23 - Regulated Industries and Administrative Law O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O47 - Empirical Studies of Economic Growth ; Aggregate Productivity ; Cross-Country Output Convergence |
Item ID: | 54703 |
Depositing User: | Richard Cebula |
Date Deposited: | 25 Mar 2014 05:50 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 15:52 |
References: | Abrams, B.A., and Schmitz, M.D. (1978). “The ‘Crowding Out’ Effect of Government Transfers on Private Charitable Contributions,” Public Choice, 33 (1): 29-39. Ali, A. (1997). “Economic Freedom, Democracy and Growth,” Journal of Private Enterprise, 13 (1): 1-20. Ali, A., and Crain, W.M. (2001). “Political Regimes, Economic Freedom, Institutions and Growth,” Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice, 19 (1): 3-22. Allison, J.A. (2013). The Financial Crisis and the Free Market Cure. New York: McGraw-Hill. Bennett, D.L. and Vedder, R.K. (2013). “A Dynamic Analysis of Economic Freedom and Income Inequality in the 50 U.S. States: Evidence of a Parabolic Relationship,” Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, 43 (1): 42-55. Carlson, K.M., and Spencer, R. W. (1975). “Crowding Out and Its Critics,” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 60 (12): 1-19. Cebula, R.J. (1978). “An Empirical Analysis of the Crowding Out of Fiscal Policy in the United States and Canada,” Kyklos, 31 (3): 424-436. Cebula, R.J. (2011). “Economic Growth, Ten Forms of Economic Freedom, and Political Stability,” Journal of Private Enterprise, 26 (2): 61-82. Cecchetti, S.G. (2006). Money, Banking, and Financial Markets. New York: McGraw-Hill. Clark, J.R., and Lawson, R.A. (2008). “The Impact of Economic Growth, Tax Policy, and Economic Freedom on Income Inequality,” Journal of Private Enterprise, 24 (1): 23-31. Clark, J.R., Boettke, P.J., and Stringham, E. (2008). “Are Regulations the Answer for Emerging Stock Markets? Evidence from the Czech Republic and Poland,” Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 48 (3): 541-566. Cole, J.H. (2003). “The Contribution of Economic Freedom to World Economic Growth,” 1980-99, Cato Journal, 23 (2): 189-198. Dawson, J.W. (2003). “Causality in the Freedom-Growth Relationship,” European Journal of Political Economy, 19 (3): 479-495. Dawson, J.W. 1998. “Institutions, Investment, and Growth: New Cross-Country and Panel Data Evidence,” Economic Inquiry, 36 (4): 603-619. De Haan, J., and Sturm, J. (2000). “On the Relationship between Economic Freedom and Economic Growth,” European Journal of Political Economy, 16 (2): 215-241. Goldsmith, A.A. (1995). “Democracy, Property Rights and Economic Growth,” The Journal of Development Studies, 32 (2): 157-174. Grubel, H.G. (1997). “Economic Freedom and Human Welfare: Some Empirical Findings,” The Cato Journal, 18 (2): 287-304. Gwartney, J., Holcombe, R., and Lawson, R.A. (2006). “Institutions and the Impact of Investment on Growth,” Kyklos, 59 (2): 255-276. Hall, J. (2013). “Economic Freedom and Regional Economics,” Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, 43 (1): 1-3. Hall, J., Sobel, R., and Crowley, G. (2010). “Institutions, Capital, and Growth,” Southern Economic Journal, 77 (2): 385-405. Hausman, J.A. (1978). “Specification Tests in Econometrics,” Econometrica, 46 (6): 1,273-1,291. Heckelman, J.C. (2000). “Economic Freedom and Economic Growth: A Short-Run Causal Relationship,” Journal of Applied Economics, 3 (1): 71-91. Heckelman, J.C., and Stroup, M.D. (2000). “Which Economic Freedoms Contribute to Economic Growth?” Kyklos, 53 (4): 527-544. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/54703 |