Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont (2014): Objective Principles of Economics.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_55031.pdf Download (165kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Economists have the habit of solving the wrong problems. They speculate circumstantially about the behavior of agents and do not come to grips with the behavior of the monetary economy. This is the consequence of the methodological imperative that all explanations must run in terms of the actions and reactions of individuals. The critical point is that no way leads from the understanding of the interaction of the individuals to the understanding of the working of the economy as a whole. The solution consists in moving from subjective-behavioral axioms to objective-structural axioms, i.e. from past to future.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Objective Principles of Economics |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | new framework of concepts; structure-centric; axiom set; methodology; complex adaptive system; profit |
Subjects: | B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B59 - Other D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D01 - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles D - Microeconomics > D5 - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium > D50 - General |
Item ID: | 55031 |
Depositing User: | Egmont Kakarot-Handtke |
Date Deposited: | 03 Apr 2014 21:08 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 17:32 |
References: | Arnsperger, C., and Varoufakis, Y. (2006). What Is Neoclassical Economics? The Three Axioms Responsible for its Theoretical Oeuvre, Practical Irrelevance and, thus, Discursive Power. Paneconomicus, 1: 5–18. Arrow, K. J. (1994). Methodological Individualism and Social Knowledge. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 84(2): 1–9. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/2117792. Benetti, C., and Cartelier, J. (1997). Economics as an Exact Science: the Persistence of a Badly Shared Conviction. In A. d’Autume, and J. Cartelier (Eds.), Is Economics Becoming a Hard Science?, pages 204–219. Cheltenham, Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar. Blaug, M. (1990). Economic Theories, True or False? Aldershot, Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar. Blaug, M. (2001). No History of Ideas, Please, We’re Economists. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(1): 145–164. Brown, K. (2011). Reflections on Relativity. Raleigh, NC: Lulu.com. Debreu, G. (1959). Theory of Value. An Axiomatic Analysis of Economic Equilibrium. New Haven, London: Yale University Press. Feynman, R. P. (1992). The Character of Physical Law. London: Penguin. Hahn, F. H. (1980). General Equilibrium Theory. Public Interest. Special Issue: The Crisis in Economic Theory, pages 123–138. Hahn, F. H. (1981). Review: A Neoclassical Analysis of Macroeconomic Policy. Economic Journal, 91(364): 1036–1039. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/2232512. Hausman, D. M. (1992). The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ingrao, B., and Israel, G. (1990). The Invisible Hand. Economic Equilibrium in the History of Science. Cambridge, MA, London: MIT Press. Kakarot-Handtke, E. (2011). Primary and Secondary Markets. SSRN Working Paper Series, 1917012: 1–26. URL http://ssrn.com/abstract=1917012. Kakarot-Handtke, E. (2013). Why Post Keynesianism is Not Yet a Science. Economic Analysis and Policy, 43(1): 97–106. URL http://www.eap-journal.com/archive/v43_i1_06-Kakarot-Handtke.pdf. Kakarot-Handtke, E. (2014). Exchange in the Monetary Economy. SSRN Working Paper Series, 2387105: 1–19. URL http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2387105. Klant, J. J. (1994). The Nature of Economic Thought. Aldershot, Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar. Kline, M. (1982). Mathematics. The Loss of Certainty. Oxford, New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of Economics. Library of Economics and Liberty. URL http://www.econlib.org/library/Marshall/marP.html. Mill, J. S. (2006). Principles of Political Economy With Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy, volume 3, Books III-V of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund. URL http://www.econlib.org/library/Mill/mlP.html. (1866). Mirowski, P. (1989). The Rise and Fall of the Concept of Equilibrium in Economic Analysis. Louvain Economic Review, 55(4): 447–468. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/40723905. Mirowski, P. (1995). More Heat than Light. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Morishima, M. (1984). The Good and Bad Use of Mathematics. In P. Wiles, and G. Routh (Eds.), Economics in Disarry, pages 51–73. Oxford: Blackwell. Murad, A. (1953). Questions for Profit Theory. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 13(1): 1–14. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/3484955. Newton, I. (1999). The Principia; Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Berkley, CA, Los Angeles, CA, London: University of California Press. (1687). Obrinsky, M. (1981). The Profit Prophets. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 3(4): 491–502. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/4537615. Porter, T. M. (1994). Rigor and Practicality: Rival Ideals of Quantification in Nineteenth-Century Economics. In P. Mirowski (Ed.), Natural Images in Economic Thought, pages 128–170. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Quiggin, J. (2010). Zombie Economics. How Dead Ideas Still Walk Among Us. Princeton, NJ, Oxford: Princeton University Press. Rosenberg, A. (1994). What is the Cognitive Status of Economic Theory? In R. E. Backhouse (Ed.), New Directions in Economic Methodology, pages 216–235. London, New York, NY: Routledge. Smith, A. (2008). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Stiglitz, J. E. (1991). Another Century of Economic Science. Economic Journal., 101(404): 134–141. Viner, J. (1963). The Economist in History. American Economic Review, 53(2): pp. 1–22. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/1823845. von Neumann, J., and Morgenstern, O. (2007). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Waldrop, M. M. (1993). Complexity. London: Viking. Weintraub, E. R. (1985). Joan Robinson’s Critique of Equilibrium: An Appraisal. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 75(2): 146–149. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/1805586. Westfall, R. S. (2008). Never at Rest. A Biography of Isaac Newton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 17th edition. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/55031 |