Technological progress with segmented factor markets and welfare implications for the urban poor

Mukherjee, Soumyatanu and Zafar, Sameen (2014): Technological progress with segmented factor markets and welfare implications for the urban poor.

Abstract

This analysis, in terms of a four-sector static general equilibrium framework, models the urban informal sector for a typical developing economy with labour market distortion in the form of unionised urban sector labour market and capital market segmentation between urban informal and formal credit markets. It has been highlighted in different literature that growth experience in the South Asian countries like India or Pakistan during liberalised regime have primarily been driven by the productivity take-off in the traded sectors. This theoretical analysis offers another attempt to predict the implications of technological progress in the traded formal sectors on informal wage, taking into consideration that real wage is a reasonable benchmark to measure the well-being of the economically marginalised people living under informal arrangements. The key model propositions are further exemplified by a sensitivity analysis using plausible ranges of parameter values for India. We also provide empirical evidence using data on twenty-seven Indian States (including one Union Territory) between 1989 and 2010 on informal wages, capital stocks in informal and formal zones and value-additions in the formal segment to substantiate the model prediction on informal wage depicted in our numerical exercise, which shows that the growth in informal wage could reasonably be linked to the productivity surge in the formal sectors, while greater capital accumulation in the informal units over the formal counterparts has further aggravated this upswing in informal wages.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Poverty; Technological Progress; Informal Wage; General Equilibrium
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E26 - Informal Economy ; Underground Economy; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F11 - Neoclassical Models of Trade; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F16 - Trade and Labor Market Interactions; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I32 - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O17 - Formal and Informal Sectors ; Shadow Economy ; Institutional Arrangements

References

1. Agenor, P.R. (1996), ‘The Labor Market and Economic Adjustment’, IMF Staff Papers 32, pp. 261 – 335.

2. Beladi, Hamid, Chaudhuri, Sarbajit and Yabuuchi, Shigemi (2008), ‘Can International Factor Mobility Reduce Wage Inequality in a Dual Economy?’ Review of International Economics 16, pp. 893 – 903.

3. Beladi, Hamid, Vina, Lynda De la and Marjit, Sugata (2012), ‘Technological Progress with Segmented Labor Markets’, Review of Development Economics 16(1), pp. 148 – 152.

4. Chaudhuri, S. (2003), ‘How and how far to liberalize a developing economy with informal sector and factor market distortions’, Journal of International Trade & Economic Development 12(4), pp. 403-428.

5. Chaudhuri, S. (2005), ‘Labour Market Distortion, Technology Transfer and Gainful Effects of Foreign Capital’, The Manchester School 73(2), pp. 214–227.

6. Chaudhuri, S., Yabbuchi, S. and Mukhopadhyay, U. (2006), ‘Inflow of Foreign Capital and Trade Liberalization in a Model with an Informal Sector and Urban Unemployment’, Pacific Economic Review 11(1), pp. 87–103.

7. Ethier, Wilfred J. (2005), ‘Globalization, globalisation: Trade, technology, and wages’, International Review of Economics & Finance 14(3), pp. 237–258.

8. Findlay, R. (1978), ‘Relative Backwardness, Direct Foreign Investment and the Transfer of Technology: a Simple Dynamic Model’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 92, pp. 1–16.

9. Findlay, Ronald and Jones, Ronald W. (2000), ‘Factor Bias and Technical Progress’, Economics Letters 68, pp. 303 – 308.

10. Goldberg, P and N Pavcnik (2003): ‘The Response of the Informal Sector to Trade Liberalisation’, Journal of Development Economics 72(2), pp. 463–496.

11. Guha-Khasnobis, B. and Faisal Bari (2003), ‘Sources of Growth in South Asian Countries’ in Isher Judge Ahluwalia and John Williamson (Eds.), The South Asian Experience with Growth, Oxford University Press.

12. Gupta, M. R. (1994) ‘Duty-Free Zone, Unemployment and Welfare: a Note’, Journal of Economics 59, pp. 217–236.

13. Jones, Ronald W. (1965), ‘The Structure of Simple General Equilibrium Models’, Journal of Political Economy 73, pp. 551 – 572.

14. Jones, Ronald W. (1971), ‘A Three-factor Model in Theory, Trade and History’, in Bhagwati, J., et al. (eds.), Trade, Balance of Payments and Growth, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

15. Jones, Ronald W. (1996), ‘International Trade, Real Wages and Technical Progress: The Specific-factors Model’, International Review of Economics and Finance 5, pp. 113 – 124. 16. Jones, Ronald W. (2003), ‘Joint Outputs and Real Wage Rates’, International Review of Economics and Finance 12, pp. 513 – 516.

17. Jones, Ronald W. (2006), ‘‘Protection and Real Wages’: The History of an Idea’, Japanese Economic Review 57, pp. 457 – 466.

18. Kar, S. and Marjit, Sugata (2009), ‘Urban Informal Sector and Poverty’, International Review of Economics and Finance 18, pp. 631–642.

19. Kathuria, Vinish, Rajesh S.N. Raj and Kunal Sen (2012), ‘Productivity Measurement in Indian Manufacturing: A Comparison of Alternative Methods’ Journal of Quantitative Economics 11 (No.s 1 & 2).

20. Kathuria, Vinish, Rajesh S.N. Raj and Kunal Sen (2013), ‘The effects of economic reforms on manufacturing dualism: Evidence from India’ Journal of Comparative Economics 41, pp. 1240–1262.

21. Koizumi, T. and Kopecky, K. J. (1977), ‘Economic Growth, Capital Movements and the International Transfer of Technical Knowledge’, Journal of International Economics 7, pp. 45–65.

22. Koizumi, T. and Kopecky, K. J. (1980), ‘Foreign direct investment, technology transfer and domestic employment effects’, Journal of International Economics 10, pp. 1–20.

23. Krugman, Paul R. (2000), ‘Technology, trade and factor prices’, Journal of International Economics 50, pp. 51 – 71.

24. Marjit, S. (2003), ‘Economic Reform and Informal Wage: A General Equilibrium Analysis’, Journal of Development Economics 72(1), pp. 371-378.

25. Marjit, S. and S. Kar (2004), ‘Pro-Market Reform and Informal Wage: Theory and the Contemporary Indian Perspective’, India Macroeconomics Annual 2004-05, pp. 130-156.

26. Marjit, S, S Kar and H Beladi (2007), ‘Trade Reform and Informal Wages’, Review of Development Economics 11(2), pp. 313-320.

27. Marjit, S., Kar, S. and R Acharyaa (2007): ‘Agricultural Prospects and Informal Wage in General Equilibrium’, Economic Modelling, 24(3), pp. 380-385.

28. Marjit, S., and Kar, S. (2008), ‘Labor Productivity Growth, Informal Wage and Capital Mobility – A General Equilibrium Analysis’, in Ravi Kanbur and Jan Svejnar (Eds.) Labour Markets and Economic Development, NY: Routledge, 2008.

29. Marjit, S., and Kar, S. (2008), ‘Productivity and Wage in the Informal Sector’ in Footprints of Development and Change:Ch 5 (V K R V Rao Centenary Volume), New Delhi: AF.

30. Marjit, S., Kar, S. and D. Maity (2008), ‘Labour Market Reform and Poverty – The Role of Informal Sector’ in Bhaskar Dutta (ed.), Issues in Development (NY: World Scientific Press).

31. Marjit, S., and Kar, S. (2009), ‘A Contemporary Perspective on the Informal Labour Market: Theory, Policy and the Indian Experience’, Economic and Political Weekly Vol. XLIV, No. 14, pp. 60 – 71.

32. Mukherjee, Soumyatanu (2012), ‘Revisiting the Apparent Paradox: Foreign Capital Inflow, Welfare Amelioration and ‘Jobless Growth’ with Agricultural Dualism and Non-traded Intermediate Input’; Journal of Economic Integration, 27(1), pp. 123-133.

33. Mukherjee, Soumyatanu (2014), ‘Liberalization and ‘Jobless Growth’ in Developing Economy – Some Extended Results’; Journal of Economic Integration (forthcoming).

34. Norback, Pehr-Johan (2001), ‘Cumulative effects of labor market distortions in a developing country’, Journal of Development Economics 65(1), pp. 135-152.

35. Schneider, F. and Enste, D.H. (2000), ‘Shadow Economies: Size, Causes, and Consequences’, Journal of Economic Literature 38, pp. 77 – 114.