Do Institutions Reduce Gender Discrimination? Evidence from Labor Market Participation Rate in Some Selected African Countries

Ojeaga, Paul and Odejimi, Deborah (2013): Do Institutions Reduce Gender Discrimination? Evidence from Labor Market Participation Rate in Some Selected African Countries.

Abstract

The study investigates the role of social-political institutions on gender discrimination and female employment in five selected African countries, Ghana, Cameroon, Botswana, Kenya and Egypt. The methodology used is the quantile regression analysis, which is based on the premise that estimating the conditional sample median will tend to the distributional median allowing us to obtain consistent estimates. Quantile regressions have some obvious advantages over the ordinary least squares estimation technique they include the fact that they are more robust against outliers in the response measurements, it also allows for the measurement of central tendency and statistical dispersion to obtain a comprehensive analysis and finally the recent quantile regression wrapper (qreg) developed by Machando and Silva (2013) allows for obtaining heteroscedastic errors robust estimates. The results of the study show that institutions matter in improving labor market participation rate for men and women in the countries in the sample. The results of the interactive variable also show that institutions actually do not improve the effect of economic policy effectiveness in promoting labor market participation. School enrollment had a higher significant effect on labor market participation rate for women than for men showing that unskilled men are likely to get hired than unskilled women therefore schooling was probably reducing unemployment more among women than in men.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Gender discrimination, Institutions, Labor Market Participation, Quantile regression
• Subjects: J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J7 - Labor Discrimination

References

Aigner J. and Cain G. (1977) “Industrial and Labor Relations Review”, Vol. 30, No.2 pp. 175- 187. Published by: Cornell University School of Industry and Labor Relations

Baliamoune-Lutz , M., McGillivray, M., (2007). “Gender inequality and growth: Evidence from Sub-Saharan and Arab countries”. http://www.uneca.org/aec/documents/Mina%20Baliamoune-Lutz.pdf (downloaded 4th of November 2013).

Becker, S., Woessmann, L., (2009). “Was Weber wrong? A human capital theory of Protestant economic history”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 124, 531-596

Becker, S., Woessmann, L., (2010). “The effect of Protestantism on education before industrialization: evidence from 1816 Prussia”. Economics Letters, in press

Burnside, C. and D. Dollar (2000). “Aid, policies, and growth”. American Economic Review.

Cagatay, N. and S. Ozler. (1995). “Feminization of the Labor Force: the Effects of Long- term Development and Structural Adjustment.” World Development, Vol. 23: 1883-1894

Cavalcanti T., Tavares J. (2008), ‘Assessing the “Engines of Liberation”: Home Appliances and Female Labor Participation’, Review of Economics and Statistics

Cuberes D. and Teignier M., (2013) “Aggregate Cost of Gender Gap in the Labor Market A Quantitative Estimate” Working Paper and update to Cuberes D. and Teignier M., (2011)“Gender Inequality and Economic Growth” World Development Report.

Dollar, D., Gatti, R., (1999). “Gender inequality, income and growth: Are good times good for women?” Policy Research Report on Gender and Development Working Paper Series No. 1, World Bank, Washington DC.

Esteve-Volart, Berta. (2009). “Gender discrimination and growth: Theory and evidence from India.” York University. Mimeo.

Fontana, M. and Wood, A., (2000), “Modeling the effects of trade on women, at work and at home”, World Development, Vol 28 No 7 pp. 1173-1190.

Jacobsen J. (2007) “The Economics of Gender” 3rd Ed. Published 2007 by Wiley- Blackwell

Karl T.L. (1997) The Paradox of Plenty: Oil Booms and Petro-states. University of California Press, 1997.

Klasen, S., (2002). “Low schooling for girls, slower growth for all? Cross country evidence on the effect of gender inequality in education on” economic development. World Bank Economic Review 16, 345-373.

Klasen, S., Wink, C., 2003. “Missing women: revisiting the debate”. Feminist Economics 9, 263 – 299.

Klasen J. (1999) “Does Gender Inequality Reduce Growth and Development? Evidence from Cross-CountryRegressions” World Bank Paper

Klasen S. and Lamanna F. (2009) “The impact of gender inequality in education and employment on economic growth: new evidence for a panel of countries”. Feminist Economics, 15(3), pp. 91-132

Machando and Silva (2013) “Quantile Regression and Heteroscedasticity” University of Essex Working Paper.

Ojeaga (2013) “Economic policy, does It help life expectancy? An African Evidence of The Role of Economic Policy on Longevity”. IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance..

Ojeaga and Ogundipe (2012) “Trade and Institutions Evidence from Regional Studies” MPRA Paper No 50628 2013.

Ross (2001) “Extractive Sectors and the Poor” Oxfam America

Sachs, J.D. and Andrews, (1997) A.M. “Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth” Journal of Economic Letter.

Sen A. (1999) “Development as Freedom” Anchor Books Publishers United States

Transparency International World Report 2010 Accessed online at http://www.transparency.org/gcb201011 on 24th November 2013.

UNESCO World Education Report 2000 Accessed online at http://www.unesco.org/education/information/wer/ on 27th October 2013.