Furukawa, Yuichi and Takarada, Yasuhiro (2013): Technological change and international interaction in environmental policies.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_55653.pdf Download (482kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper considers the impact of differences in endogenous technological change between two countries on global pollution emissions under international strategic interaction in environmental policies. A country that initially has a dirty technology (an environmentally lagging country) reduces more pollution emissions by imposing a higher rate of pollution reduction per unit of the emission, although it may generate larger total emissions. The more a country reduces pollutants, the more it learns how to produce in an environmentally friendly manner at low cost. The main finding is that an environmentally lagging country's technology may continue to advance through a learning-by-doing effect until it exceeds the environmental friendliness of a leading country that initially had the cleanest technology (i.e., environmental leapfrogging could occur). Whether a country eventually becomes an environmentally leading country depends on the country size and its awareness of environmental quality.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Technological change and international interaction in environmental policies |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Environmental policy; leapfrogging; learning-by-doing; strategic interaction; technological change; transboundary pollution |
Subjects: | O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O30 - General Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q55 - Technological Innovation O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O44 - Environment and Growth |
Item ID: | 55653 |
Depositing User: | Yuichi Furukawa |
Date Deposited: | 01 May 2014 07:00 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 12:04 |
References: | Acemoglu, Daron, Philippe Aghion, Leonardo Bursztyn, and David Hemous (2012) The environment and directed technical change, American Economic Review 102 (1), 131-166. Arrow, Kenneth (1962) The economic implications of learning by doing, Review of Economic Studies 29 (3), 155-173. Bosetti, Valentina, Carlo Carraro, Emanuele Massetti, and Massimo Tavoni (2008) International energy R&D spillovers and the economics of greenhouse gas atmospheric stabilization, Energy Economics 30 (6), 2912-2929. Bovenberg, A. Lans and Sjak A. Smulders (1996) Transitional impacts of environmental policy in an endogenous growth model, International Economic Review 37 (4), 861-893. Brezis, Elise S. and Daniel Tsiddon (1998) Economic growth, leadership and capital flows: The leapfrogging effect, Journal of International Trade and Economic Development 7 (3), 261-277. Brezis, Elise S., Paul R. Krugman, and Daniel Tsiddon (1993) Leapfrogging in international competition: A theory of cycles in national technological leadership, American Economic Review 83 (5), 1211-1219. Carrion-Flores, Carmen E. and Robert Innes (2010) Environmental innovation and environmental performance, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 59 (1), 27-42. Copeland, Brian. R. and M. Scott Taylor (2004) Trade, growth and the environment, Journal of Economic Literature 42 (1), 7-71. Dasgupta, Susmita, Benoit Laplante, Hua Wang, and David Wheeler (2002) Confronting the environmental Kuznets curve, Journal of Economic Perspectives 16 (1), 147-168. Dechezleprêtre, Antoine, Matthieu Glachant, Ivan Haščič, Nick Johnstone, and Yann Ménière (2011) Invention and transfer of climate change-mitigation technologies: A global analysis, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 5 (1), 109-130. Desmet, Klaus (2002) A simple dynamic model of uneven development and overtaking, Economic Journal 112 (482), 894-918. Dinda, Soumyananda (2004) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: A survey, Ecological Economics 49 (4), 431-455. Fischer, Carolyn and Richard G. Newell (2008) Environmental and technology policies for climate mitigation, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 55 (2), 142-162. Furukawa, Yuichi (2007) The protection of intellectual property rights and endogenous growth: Is stronger always better?, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 31 (11), 3644-3670. Furukawa, Yuichi (2013) Leapfrogging cycles in international competition, MPRA Paper No. 51302. Gallagher, Kelly Sims (2006) Limits to leapfrogging in energy technologies? Evidence from the Chinese automobile industry, Energy Policy 34 (4), 383-394. Giovannetti, Emanuele (2001) Perpetual leapfrogging in Bertrand duopoly, International Economic Review 42 (3), 671-696. Goulder, Lawrence H. and Koshy Mathai (2000) Optimal CO2 abatement in the presence of induced technological change, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 39 (1), 1-38. Grimaud, André and Frederic Tournemaine (2007) Why can an environmental policy tax promote growth through the channel of education?, Ecological Economics 62 (1), 27-36. Grossman, Gene M. and Alan B. Krueger (1993) Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement, in The Mexico-U.S. Free Trade Agreement, ed. P. Garber, Cambridge: MIT Press. Huber, Joseph (2008) Pioneer countries and the global diffusion of environmental innovations: Theses from the viewpoint of ecological modernisation theory, Global Environmental Change 18 (3), 360-367. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: Mitigation of climate change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. IPCC (2011) Renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change, Geneva: IPCC. Available at: http://mitigation2014.org/ Lanjouw, Jean Olson and Ashoka Mody (1996) Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technology, Research Policy 25 (4), 549-571. Lovely, Mary, and David Popp (2011) Trade, technology, and the environment: Does access to technology promote environmental regulation?, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 61 (1), 16-35. Motta, Massimo, Jacques-Francois Thisse, and Antonio Cabrales (1997) On the persistence of leadership or leapfrogging in international trade, International Economic Review 38 (4), 809-824. Newell, Richard G., Adam B. Jaffe, and Robert N. Stavins (1999) The induced innovation hypothesis and energy-saving technological change, Quarterly Journal of Economics 114 (3), 941-975. OECD (2012) OECD environmental outlook to 2050: The consequences of inaction, Paris: OECD. Ohyama, Michihiro and Ronald W. Jones (1995) Technology choice, overtaking and comparative advantage, Review of International Economics 3 (2), 224-234. Perkins, Richard (2003) Environmental leapfrogging in developing countries: A critical assessment and reconstruction, Natural Resources Forum 27 (3), 177-188. Popp, David (2002) Induced innovation and energy prices, American Economic Review 92 (1), 160-180. Popp, David (2012) The role of technological change in green growth, NBER Working Paper, No. 18506. Quah, Danny (1996a) Regional convergence clusters across Europe, European Economic Review 40 (3-5), 951-958. Quah, Danny (1996b) Empirics for economic growth and convergence, European Economic Review 40 (6), 1353-1375. Romer, Paul (1986) Increasing returns and long-run growth, Journal of Political Economy 94 (5), 1002-1037. Schou, Poul (2002) Pollution externalities in a model of endogenous fertility and growth, International Tax and Public Finance 9 (6), 709-725. Stern, David I. (2004) The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve, World Development 32 (8), 1419-1439. van de Klundert, Theo and Sjak Smulders (2001) Loss of technological leadership of rentier economies: A two-country endogenous growth model, Journal of International Economics 54 (1), 211-231. Walz, Rainer (2010) Competences for green development and leapfrogging in newly industrializing countries, International Economics and Economic Policy 7 (2-3), 245-265. Watson, Jim and Raphael Sauter (2011) Sustainable innovation through leapfrogging: A review of the evidence, International Journal of Technology and Globalisation 5 (3-4), 170-189. World Bank (2003) World development report 2003: Sustainable development in a dynamic world, New York: Oxford University Press. Young, Alwyn (1991) Learning by doing and the dynamic effects of international trade. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (2), 369-405. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/55653 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Technological change and international interaction in environmental policies. (deposited 29 Jan 2013 00:10)
- Learning by Doing and International Interaction in Environmental Policies. (deposited 16 Nov 2015 08:20)
-
Technological change and international interaction in environmental policies. (deposited 18 Jul 2013 08:53)
- Technological change and international interaction in environmental policies. (deposited 01 May 2014 07:00) [Currently Displayed]