Yildiz, Özgür and Rommel, Jens and Debor, Sarah and Holstenkamp, Lars and Mey, Franziska and Müller, Jakob R. and Radtke, Jörg and Rognli, Judith (2014): Research Perspectives on Renewable Energy Cooperatives in Germany: Empirical Insights and Theoretical Lenses.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_55931.pdf Download (383kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Transformation of energy systems is influencing economic policy agendas all over the world, particularly so in industrialized countries. In this process, Germany has taken a pioneering role. Technical innovations, institutional frameworks, and business models established there are of interest for other countries trying to achieve broader use of renewable energies. Energy cooperatives have been an important building block of the energy transition in Germany, though their practical importance is neither quantitatively nor qualitatively reflected in the academic literature. Drawing on recently collected data, this paper presents an overview of German energy cooperatives in terms of their (1) organization, (2) membership, and (3) financing. We then review theories from economics and the social sciences that, on various levels, have been used to analyze cooperatives in other fields or other forms of community-driven organization. We discuss how these theories could be applied for a better understanding of energy cooperatives, derive a preliminary research agenda and assess the scope for interdisciplinary work among economists, sociologists, and other related disciplines.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Research Perspectives on Renewable Energy Cooperatives in Germany: Empirical Insights and Theoretical Lenses |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Business models; Decentralization; Energy cooperatives; Energy transition; |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D23 - Organizational Behavior ; Transaction Costs ; Property Rights L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L22 - Firm Organization and Market Structure L - Industrial Organization > L3 - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise > L32 - Public Enterprises ; Public-Private Enterprises L - Industrial Organization > L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities > L94 - Electric Utilities Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q42 - Alternative Energy Sources |
Item ID: | 55931 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Özgür Yildiz |
Date Deposited: | 15 May 2014 19:13 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 06:25 |
References: | [1] Jäger-Waldau A, Szabó M, Scarlat N, Monforti-Ferrario F. Renewable electricity in Eu-rope. Renew Sustain Energy Rev; 15 (8): 3703–3716. [2] Karger CR, Hennings W. Sustainability evaluation of decentralized electricity generation. Renew Sustain Energy Rev; 13 (3): 583–593. [3] Pepermans G, Driesen J, Haeseldonckx D, Belmans R, D’haeseleer W. Distributed gene-ration: definition, benefits and issues. Energy Policy; 33 (6): 787–798. [4] Bohn D. Decentralised energy systems: state of the art and potentials. Int J of Energy Technol and Policy; 3 (1/2): 1–11. [5] Haas R, Panzer C, Resch G, Ragwitz M, Reece G, Held A. A historical review of promotion strategies for electricity from renewable energy sources in EU countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev; 15 (2): 1003–1034. [6] Mosher JN, Corscadden KW. Agriculture's contribution to the renewable energy sector: Policy and economics – Do they add up? Renew Sustain Energy Rev; 16 (6): 4157–4164. [7] Richter M. Utilities’ business models for renewable energy: A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev; 16 (5): 2483–2493. [8] Yildiz Ö. Financing renewable energy infrastructures via financial citizen participation – The case of Germany. Renew Energy 2014, 68: 677-685. [9] Viardot E. The role of cooperatives in overcoming the barriers to adoption of renewable energy. Energy Policy; 63: 756–764. [10] Walker G, Devine-Wright P. Community renewable energy: What should it mean? Energy Policy 2008; 36 (2): 497–500. [11] Musall FD, Kuik O. Local acceptance of renewable energy—A case study from southeast Germany. Energy Policy 2011; 39 (6): 3252–3260. [12] Warren CR, McFadyen M. Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from south-west Scotland. Land Use Policy 2010; 27 (2): 204–213. [13] Walker G. What are the barriers and incentives for community-owned means of energy production and use? Energy Policy 2008; 36 (12): 4401–4405. [14] Enzensberger N, Fichtner W, Rentz O. Financing renewable energy projects via closed-end funds – a German case study. Renew Energy 2003; 28 (13): 2023–2036. [15] Holstenkamp L, Degenhart H. Citizen Participation Schemes for Renewable Energies. A Definition from a Financial Economics Point of View. Working Paper Series in Business and Law No. 13. Lüneburg, Germany: Leuphana University Lüneburg; 2013. [16] Mautz R, Byzio A, Rosenbaum W. Auf dem Weg zur Energiewende Die Entwicklung der Stromproduktion aus erneuerbaren Energien in Deutschland. Göttingen: Universitätsverlag Göttingen; 2008. [17] Bolinger M. Community Wind Power Ownership Schemes in Europe and their Relevance to the United States. Berkeley, Ca.: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; 2001. [18] Breukers S, Wolsink M. Wind power implementation in changing institutional landscapes: An international comparison. Energy Policy 2007; 35 (5): 2737–2750. [19] Deutscher Genossenschafts- und Raiffeisenverband e.V (DGRV). Energiegenossenschaften – Ergebnisse der Umfrage des DGRV und seiner Mitgliedsverbände 2013. Berlin: DGRV; 2013. [20] Flieger B. Energiegenossenschaften. Eine klimaverantwortliche, bürgernahe Energiewirtschaft ist möglich. In: Elsen S, editor. Ökosoziale Transformation – Solidarische Ökonomie und die Gestaltung des Gemeinwesens. Neu-Ulm: AG SPAK Bücher, 2011, p. 315–338. [21] Spear R. The Co-operative Advantage. Ann Public Coop Econ 2000; 71 (4): 507–523. [22] Doty DH, Glick WH. Typologies as a Unique Form of Theory Building – Toward Improved Understanding and Modeling. Acad Manag Rev 1994; 19 (2): 230–251 [23] Engelhardt WW. Classification and Typologies of Cooperatives. In: Dülfer E, editor. International Handbook of Cooperative Organizations. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht; 1994, p. 100–106. [24] Chaddad FR, Cook ML. Understanding New Cooperative Models – An Ownership-Control Rights Typology. Rev Agric Econ 2004; 26 (3):348–360. [25] Flieger B, Klemisch H. Eine andere Energiewirtschaft ist möglich – Pionierfunktion neuer Energiegenossenschaften. Constraste 2008; 25 (285): 7. [26] Klemisch H, Maron H. Genossenschaftliche Lösungsansätze zur Sicherung der kommunalen Daseinsvorsorge. Zeitschrift für das gesamte Genossenschaftswesen (ZfgG) 2010; 60 (1):3–13. [27] Holstenkamp L, Müller JR. Zum Stand von Energiegenossenschaften in Deutschland – Ein statistischer Überblick zum 31.12.2012. Working Paper Series in Business and Law No. 14. Lüneburg, Germany: Leuphana University Lüneburg; 2013. [28] Porter ME. Competitive advantage – creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press; 1998. [29] AG Energiebilanzen. AGEB. URL: http://www.ag-energiebilanzen.de/ (accessed on 02.02.2014). [30] Wolman P: The New Deal for Electricity in the United States, 1930-1950. In: Barnes DF, editor. The challenge of rural electrification – Strategies for developing countries. Wash-ington, DC: RFF Press; 2007, p. 259–292. [31] Yadoo A, Cruickshank H. The value of cooperatives in rural electrification. Energy Policy 2010; 38 (6): 2941–2947. [32] Faust H. Geschichte der Genossenschaftsbewegung. 3rd ed., Frankfurt/Main: Fritz Knapp; 1977. [33] Debor, S. The Socio-Economic Power of Renewable Energy Production Cooperatives in Germany. Results of an Empirical Assessment. Wuppertal Papers Nr. 187. Wuppertal: Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy; 2014. [34] Zerche J., Schmale I., Blome-Drees, J. Einführung in die Genossenschaftslehre. München: Oldenbourg; 1998. [35] Radtke J. Die Energiewende in Deutschland und die Partizipation der Bürger - BBE Newsletter 02/2014. Berlin: Bundesnetzwerk Bürgerschaftliches Engagement e.V., 2014. [36] Klemisch H. Energiegenossenschaften als regionale Antwort auf den Klimawandel. In: Schröder C, Walk H, editors. Genossenschaften und Klimaschutz – Akteure für zukunftsfähige, solidarische Städte. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien; 2014, p. 149–166. [37] Coase RH. The Nature of the Firm. Economica 1937; 4 (16): 386–405. [38] Williamson OE. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism – Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. 1st ed. New York: The Free Press; 1985. [39] Bonus H. The Cooperative Association as a Business Enterprise: A Study in the Economics of Transactions. J Inst Theor Econ, 1986; 142 (2): 310–339. [40] Ménard C. The Economics of Hybrid Organizations. J Inst Theor Econ, 2004; 160: 345–376. [41] Cook ML. The Future of U.S. Agricultural Cooperatives: A Neo-Institutional Approach. Amer J Agr Econ, 1995; 77 (5):1153–1159. [42] Sykuta ME, Cook ML. A New Institutional Economics Approach to Contracts and Cooperatives. Amer J Agr Econ, 2001; 83 (5): 1273–1279. [43] Hansmann H. The ownership of enterprise. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1996. [44] Yildiz Ö. Energiegenossenschaften in Deutschland – Bestandsentwicklung und institutionenökonomische Analyse. Zeitschrift für das gesamte Genossenschaftswesen, 2013; 63 (3): 173-185. [45] Thaler R. The Winner’s Curse: Paradoxes and Anomalies of Economic Life. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1994. [46] Kahneman D. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Macmillan; 2011. [47] Ariely D. Predictably Irrational. The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions. New York: Harper Collins; 2009. [48] Fehr E, Rangel A. Neuroeconomic Foundations of Economic Choice: Recent Advances. J Econ Persp, 2011; 25 (4): 3-30. [49] Fehr E, Schmidt KM. A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation. Q J Econ, 1999; 114 (3): 817-868. [50] Dal Bó P, Foster A, Putterman L. Institutions and Behavior: Experimental Evidence on the Effects of Democracy. Amer Econ Rev, 2010; 100 (5): 2205–2229. [51] Bowles S. Endogenous Preferences: The Cultural Consequences of Markets and other Economic Institutions. J Econ Lit, 1998; 36 (1): 75–111. [52] Fehr E, Kremhelmer S, Schmidt KM. Fairness and the Optimal Allocation of Ownership Rights. Econ J, 2008; 118 (531): 1262-1284. [53] Ben-Ner A, Ellman M. The contributions of behavioural economics to understanding and advancing the sustainability of worker cooperatives. J Entrep Organ Divers, 2013; 2 (1): 75–100. [54] Montmarquette C, Rullière J-L, Villeval M-C, Zeiliger R. Redesigning Teams and Incentives in a Merger: An Experiment with Managers and Students. Manag Sci, 2004; 50 (10): 1379-1389. [55] Henrich J, Boyd R, Bowles S, Camerer C, Fehr E, Gintis H. Foundations of Human Sociality: Economic Experiments and Ethnographic Evidence from Fifteen Small-Scale Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004. [56] Viceisza A. Treating the Field as a Lab: A Basic Guide to Conducting Economic Experiments for Policymaking. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute; 2012. [57] Harrison G, List J. Field Experiments. J Econ Lit, 2004; 42 (4): 1009-1055. [58] Valentinov V. Why are cooperatives important in agriculture? An organizational economics perspective. J Inst Econ, 2007; 3 (1): 55-69. [59] Chamberlin EH. Theory of Monopolistic Competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1933. [60] Cotterill RW. Agricultural Cooperatives: A Unified Theory of Pricing, Finance, and Investment. In: Royer JS, editor. Cooperative Theory: New Approaches. Washington D.C.: US Department of Agriculture, 1987, pp. 171–258. [61] Sexton RJ. Cooperatives and the Forces Shaping Agricultural Marketing. Am J Agr Econ, 1986; 68 (5): 1167–1171. [62] LeVay C. Agricultural Cooperative Theory: A Review. J Agr Econ, 1983; 34 (1): 1–44. [63] Bijman J, Iliopoulos C, Poppe KJ, Gijselinckx C, Hagedorn K, Hanisch M et al. Support for Farmers' Cooperatives – Final Report. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen University; 2012. [64] Milford AB. The Pro-Competitive Effect of Coffee Cooperatives in Chiapas, Mexico. J Agr Food Indust Organ, 2012; 10 (1): 1-27. [65] Hanisch M, Rommel J, Müller M. The Cooperative Yardstick Revisited: Panel Evidence from the European Dairy Sectors. J Agr Food Indust Organ, 2013; 11 (1): 151-162. [66] Pennerstorfer D, Weiss CR. Product Quality in the Agri-Food Chain: Do Cooperatives Offer High-Quality Wine? Eur Rev Agr Econ, 2013; 40 (1): 143-162. [67] Schiffer HW. Wettbewerb und Preise auf dem Strommarkt. Wirtschaftsdienst, 2011; 91 (4): 284-286. [68] Bundeskartellamt. Sektoruntersuchung Stromerzeugung und -großhandel. Bonn: Bundeskartellamt, 2011. [69] Müller J, Rommel J. Is There a Future Role for Urban Electricity Cooperatives? The case of Greenpeace Energy. In: Ramos-Martín J, Giampietro M, Ulgiati S, Bukkens SGF, editors. Can We Break the Addiction to Fossil Energy? Proceedings of the 7th Biennial International Workshop Advances in Energy Studies Barcelona, Spain 19–21 October 2010. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 2011, p. 185-195. [70] Mattes A, Wittenberg E. „Nur wenige wechseln den Stromanbieter": Sechs Fragen an Anselm Mattes. DIW Wochenbericht, 2012; 79 (7): 10. [71] Achtnicht M. Do environmental benefits matter? Evidence from a choice experiment among house owners in Germany. Ecol Econ, 2011; 70 (11): 2191-2200. [72] Borchers AM., Duke JM., Parsons GA. Does willingness to pay for green energy differ by source? Energy Policy, 2007; 35 (6): 3327-3334. [73] Rommel K, Meyerhoff J. Empirische Analyse des Wechselverhaltens von Stromkunden. Was hält Stromkunden davon ab, zu Ökostromanbietern zu wechseln? Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft, 2009; 33 (1): 74-82. [74] Akerlof GA. The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. Q J Econ, 1970; 84 (3): 488–500. [75] Sagebiel J, Müller J, Rommel J. Are Consumers Willing to Pay More for Electricity from Cooperatives? Results from an Online Choice Experiment in Germany. Energy Res Soc Sci, doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2014.04.003. [76] Walker G. The role for “community” in carbon governance. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang, 2011; 2 (5): 777–782. [77] Walker G, Cass N. Carbon reduction, “the public” and renewable energy: engaging with socio-technical configurations. Area, 2007; 39 (4): 458-469. [78] Cass N, Walker G, Devine-Wright P. Good Neighbours, Public Relations and Bribes: The Politics and Perceptions of Community Benefit Provision in Renewable Energy Development in the UK. J Environ Policy Plan, 2010; 12 (3): 255-275. [79] Park JJ. Fostering community energy and equal opportunities between communities. Local Environ: Int J Justice Sustain, 2012; 17 (4): 387-408. [80] Webler T, Kastenholz H, Renn O. Public participation in impact assessment: a social learning perspective. Environ Impact Asses, 1995; 15 (5): 443-463. [81] Fast S. A Habermasian analysis of local renewable energy deliberations. J Rural Stud, 2013; 30: 86-98. [82] Rothschild J, Whitt JA. The cooperative workplace: Potentials and dilemmas of organizational democracy and participation. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1986. [83] Arnstein SR. A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. J Am Inst Planners, 1969; 35 (4): 216-224. [84] Collins K, Ison R. Jumping off Arnstein’s ladder: social learning as a new policy paradigm for climate change adaptation. Environ Policy Gov, 2009; 19 (6): 358-373. [85] Bentley .T, Everyday democracy: why we get the politicians we deserve. London: Demos, 2005. [86] Ginsborg P. The politics of everyday life: making choices, changing lives. New Haven; London: Yale University Press, 2005. [87] Rosanvallon P. Democratic legitimacy impartiality, reflexivity, proximity. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011. [88] Pondy LR. Organizational Conflict: Concepts and Models: Adm Sci Q, 1967; 12 (2): 296-320. [89] Coser LA. Social Conflict and the Theory of Social Change: The Br Jof Sociol, 1957; 8(3): 197-207. [90] Barley SR. Contextualizing Conflict: Notes on the Anthropology of Disputes and Negotiations. In: Bazerman MH, Lewicki RJ, Sheppard BH, editors. Handbook of negotiation research. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1991, p. 165-199. [91] Zarankin TG. A New Look at Conflict Styles: Goal Orientation and Outcome Preferences: Int J of Confl Manag, 2008; 19(2): 167-184. [92] Scheffran J. Energiekonflikte, Klimawandel und nachhaltige Entwicklung, In: Imbusch P, Zoll R, editors. Friedens- und Konfliktforschung: Eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: 5th ed., VS Verl. für Sozialwiss., 2010, p. 333–352. [93] Balnave N, Patmore G. Rochdale Consumer Co-operatives in Australia: Decline and Survival: Bus Hist, 2012; 54(6): 986-1003. [94] Ekberg E. Confronting three revolutions: Western European consumer co-operatives and their divergent development, 1950–2008. Bus Hist, 2012; 54(6): 1004-1021. [95] Theurl T. Genossenschaftliche Kooperationen: Trends und Zukunftsfelder, In: Theurl T, Raiffeisenverband Südtirol, editors, Genossenschaften auf dem Weg in die Zukunft: Wissenschaftliches Symposium, Bozen 12. November 2010. Aachen: Shaker-Verlag, 2011, p. 71-90. [96] Ayub N, Jehn K. When Diversity Helps Performance: Effects of Diversity on Conflict and Performance in Workgroups. Intern J of Confl Manag, 2014; 25(2): Forthcoming. [97] Daudi P, Sotto R. European Cooperations in Transition - The Metamorphosis of Homo Cooperativus. Scand J of Manag Stud, 1986; 3 (1): 65-85. [98] Bonus H. Das Selbstverständnis moderner Genossenschaften: Rückbindung von Kreditgenossenschaften an ihre Mitglieder. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr, 1994. [99] Schröder C. Neue Formen städtischer Solidarität: Das Beispiel Genossenschaften. In: Schröder C, Walk H, editors. Genossenschaften und Klimaschutz. Akteure für zukunftsfähige, solidarische Städte. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien, 2014, p. 73-92. [100] Stumberger R. Zwischen Mitarbeiterdemokratie und Markt - Die Industriekooperative Mondragon. Zeitschrift für das gesamte Genossenschaftswesen, 2003; 53(3): 221-227. [101] Hernandez S. Striving for Control: Democracy and Oligarchy at a Mexican Cooperative. Econ and Ind Democr, 2006; 27(1): 105-135. [102] Cornforth C, Thomas A, Lewis J, Spear R. Developing successful worker co-operatives. London: Sage Publications, 1988. [103] Hoffmann EA. Dispute Resolution in a Worker Cooperative: Formal Procedures and Procedural Justice. Law and Soc Rev, 2005; 39 (1): 51-82. [104] Mojtahed D. Conflict Management of Cooperative Organizations in Contemporary Iran: A Review Analysis. Publ Organ Rev, 2007; 7 (2): 163-180. [105] Beckmann V. Interessen, Zielfindung und Entwicklungspfade in Agrargenossenschaften, In: Hagedorn K, editor. Agrargenossenschaften: Mitgliederinteressen und ökonomische Perspektiven. Berlin: Institut für Genossenschaftswesen Berlin, 1997, p. 11-32. [106] Darr A. Conflict and Conflict Resolution in a Cooperative: The Case of the Nir Taxi Station. Hum Relat, 1999; 52(3): 279-301. [107] Darr A, Lewin AC. Democratic Justice Regimes in Work Organizations: The Case of Israeli Taxi Cooperatives. Econ and Ind Democr 2001; 22 (3): 383-405. [108] Davis P. The Governance of Co-operatives Under Competitive Conditions: Issues, Processes and Culture. Corp Gov, 2001; 1(4): 28-39 [109] Hansen MH, Morrow Jr JL, Batista JC. The impact of trust on cooperative membership retention, performance, and satisfaction: an exploratory study. Int Food Agribus Manag Rev, 2002; 5 (1): 41-59. [110] Misztal BA. Trust in modern societies: the search for the bases of social order. Cambridge: U.K.: Polity Press; 1996. [111] Cornforth C. The Governance of Cooperatives and Mutual Associations: A Paradox Perspective. Ann Public Coop Econ, 2004; 75 (1): 11-32. [112] Österberg P, Nilsson J. Members’ perception of their participation in the governance of cooperatives: the key to trust and commitment in agricultural cooperatives. Agribus, 2009; 25 (2): 181-197. [113] Putnam RD. Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital. J Democr, 1995; 6 (1): 65-78. [114] Coleman JS. Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am J Sociol, 1988; 94: 95-120. [115] Luhmann N. Trust and Power: Two Works. Chichester: Wiley; 1979. [116] Walker G, Devine-Wright P, Hunter S, High H, Evans B. Trust and community: Exploring the meanings, contexts and dynamics of community renewable energy. Energy Policy, 2009; 38 (6): 2655-2663. [117] Borgen SO. Identification as a trust-generating mechanism in cooperatives. Ann Public Coop Econ, 2001; 72 (2): 209-229. [118] Nilsson J. Organisational principles for co-operative firms. Scand J Man, 2001; 17 (3): 329-356. [119] Greenpeace Energy eG. URL: http://www.greenpeace-energy.de/genossenschaft.html (accessed on 31.03.2014). |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/55931 |