Diagramas de argumentación y política criminal

Estrada, Fernando (2014): Diagramas de argumentación y política criminal.

Abstract

This article is aimed at viewing the evidence in the legal and political debate. A field relatively little addressed in the expert literature. We relying on the philosophy of science and a little less in legal theory, note that explanations of inductive framework of legal and political knowledge and arguments about evidence and proof, are based on probabilistic connections and falsifiable assumptions and not honored meta theoretical speculations. The support base to represent the legal debate - Political now has solid components of formal logic and empirical research.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Argument Diagrams and criminal policy
• Language: Spanish
• Keywords: Economic political, Argumentation, Social Science, Crime, Diagrams, Sociology
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A12 - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D86 - Economics of Contract: Theory; Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z13 - Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology ; Social and Economic Stratification; Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z18 - Public Policy

References

Walton, Douglas, and Chris Reed. 2003. Diagramming, Argumentation Schemes and Critical Questions. In Anyone Who Has a View: Theoretical Contributions to the Study of Argumentation. Ed. Frans H. van Eemeren, J. Anthony Blair, Charles A. Willard, and A. Francisca Snoek Henkemans, 195–211. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Toulmin, Stephen, The Uses of Argument, Cambridge, University Press, Cambridge, 1958.

Loui, Ronald P., A Citation-Based Reflection on Toulmin and Argument en: Bart Verheij, ed. For special of Argumentation, 2005. [CMMRRSSVW2006]

C.Chesñevar, J. McGinnis, S. Modgil, I. Rahwan, C. Reed, G. Simari, M. South,

G. Vreeswijk, S. Wilmott Towards an Argument Interchange Format,, The Knowledge Engineering Review (KER), Cambridge University Press (in press), 2006.