Feng, Li (2005): Hire Today, Gone Tomorrow: The Determinants of Attrition among Public School Teachers.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_589.pdf Download (244kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Increases in the school-age population, maximum class size requirements in various states and the No Child Left Behind Act’s mandate of a “highly qualified teacher” in every classroom collectively will increase the demand for teachers. However, public school teachers are exiting the profession in large numbers. This poses a serious challenge for policymakers. In this paper I analyze the determinants of teacher attrition using matched teacher-student class-level information for all Florida public school teachers. In addition to teacher demographics and school characteristics employed in previous studies, I include a number of variables measuring the characteristics of the specific students assigned to each teacher. The results indicate that classroom characteristics, such as students’ performance on standardized tests and the average number of disciplinary incidents, play a larger role than school average student characteristics in determining teacher attrition. Teacher pay has a positive influence on retention, while the results for class size are mixed. There is also some evidence that more able teachers are more likely to exit the teaching profession. These findings suggest that in addition to salary, classroom assignment is an important factor when considering policies to promote teacher retention and teacher quality.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Hire Today, Gone Tomorrow: The Determinants of Attrition among Public School Teachers |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Teacher Turnover; Classroom Environment; Students' Test Scores |
Subjects: | J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J6 - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers > J63 - Turnover ; Vacancies ; Layoffs J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J4 - Particular Labor Markets > J45 - Public Sector Labor Markets I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I21 - Analysis of Education |
Item ID: | 589 |
Depositing User: | Li Feng |
Date Deposited: | 26 Oct 2006 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 18:43 |
References: | Ballou, D. (1996). Do Public Schools Hire the Best Applicants? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111(1), 97–133. Ballou, D., & Podgursky, M. (1998). Teacher Recruitment and Retention in Public and Private Schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 17(3), 393–417. Boyd, D., Lankford, H., Loeb, S. & Wyckoff, J. (2005). Explaining the Short Careers of High-Achieving Teachers in Schools with Low-Performing Students American Economic Review, 95(2),166-171 . Brewer, D. J. (1996). Career Paths and Quit Decisions: Evidence from Teaching, Journal of Labor Economics, 14(2), 313-339. Davidson, R. & MacKinnon, J. (1993) Estimation and Inference in Econometrics. New York: Oxford University Press. Education Commission of the States (ECS) (2005) State Class-size Reduction Measures http://www.ecs.org/clearinghouse/59/18/5918.htm Even, W. & Macpherson, D. (1996) Employer Size and Labor Turnover: The Role of Pensions, Industrial and Labor Relations Review 49(4), 707-728. Farber, H. (1999) Mobility and Stability: The Dynamics of Job Change in Labor Markets. The Handbook of Labor Economics, Orley Ashenfelter and David Card (eds.) Vol 3, Elsevier Science. Florida Department of Education (2003) Florida Teacher Retention www.firn.edu/doe/evaluation/pdf/retentionbrieffinal.pdf Gritz. R. M., & Theobald, N. D., (1996). The Effects of School District Spending Priorities on Length of Stay in Teaching. Journal of Human Resources, 31(3), 477-512. Hanushek, E. & Pace., R. (1995). Who Chooses to Teach (and Why)? Economics of Education Review, 14(2), 101–117. Hanushek, E. A., Kain, J. F., & Rivkin, S. G. (2004). Why Public Schools Lose Teachers. Journal of Human Resources, 39(2), 326-354. Harris, D. N., & Adams, S. (forthcoming). Is Teacher Turnover High or Just Different? A Comparison of Teachers with Other Professionals. Economics of Education Review. Henke, R. R., Chen, X., Geis, S., & Knepper, P. (2000). Progress Through the Teacher Pipeline: 1992–93 College Graduates and Elementary/Secondary Teaching as 19 of 1997. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics. Henke, R., Zahn, L & Carroll, D. (2001). Attrition of new teachers among recent college graduates. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Imazeki, J. (2004). Teacher salaries and teacher attrition. Economics of Education Review. 24(4), 431-449 Ingersoll, R. M. (2001). Teacher Turnover and Teacher Shortages: An Organizational Analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 499–534. Mont, D & Rees., D. I. (1996). The Influence of Classroom Characteristics on High School Teacher Turnover, Economic Inquiry 34(1), 152-167. Murnane, R. J., & Olsen, R. J. (1989a). The Effects of Salaries and Opportunity Costs on Duration in Teaching: Evidence from Michigan. Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(2), 347–352. Murnane, R. J., & Olsen, R. J. (1989b). Will There Be Enough Teachers? American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings of the Hundred and First Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, LXXIX, 242–246. Murnane, R. J., & Olsen, R. J. (1990). The Effect of Salaries and Opportunity Costs on Length of Stay in Teaching. Evidence from North Carolina. The Journal of Human Resources, 25(1), 106–124. Murnane, R. J., & Schwinden, M. (1989). Race, Gender, and Opportunity: Supply and Demand for New Teachers in North Carolina, 1975–1985. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(2), 93–108. Murnane, R. J., Singer, J. D., Willett, J. B., Kemple, J. J., & Olsen, R. J. (1991). Who Will Teach? Policies That Matter. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2005). Teachers Matter: Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers. Podgursky, M., Monroe, R.,Watson, D. (2004). The Academic Quality of Public School Teachers: An Analysis of Entry and Exit Behavior. Economics of Education Review, 23(5), 507-518. Shen, J. (1997). Teacher retention and attrition in public schools: evidence from SASS91. The Journal of Educational Research, 91(2), 81-88. Smith, R. & R. Blundell. (1986) An exogeneity test for a simultaneous equation Tobit model with an application to labor supply. Econometrica, 54(3), 679-686 Stinebrickner, T. R. (1998). An Empirical Investigation of Teacher Attrition. Economics of Education Review, 17(2), 127-136. 20 Stinebrickner, T. R. (1999). Estimation of a Duration Model in the Presence of Missing Data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(3), 529–542. Stinebrickner, T. R. (2001). A Dynamic Model of Teacher Labor Supply. Journal of Labor Economics, 19(1), 196–230. Stinebrickner, T. R. (2002). An Analysis of Occupational Change and Departure from the Labor Force: Evidence for the Reasons that Teachers Leave. Journal of Human Resources, 37(1), 193–216. Texas Center for Educational Research (2000) The Cost of Teacher Turnover. Topel, R. H. &Ward, M. (1992) Job Mobility and the Careers of Young Men The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 439-479. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (2002) Schools and Staffing Survey, 1999-2000: Overview of the Data for Public, Private, Public Charter, and Bureau of Indian Affairs Elementary and Secondary Schools, NCES 2002-313, by Kerry Gruber, Susan D. Wiley, Stephen P. Broughman, Gregory A. Strizek, and Marisa Burian-Fitzgerald. Washington, D.C. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (2004) by Luekens, M. T., Lyter, D. M., Fox, E. E., & Chandler, K. Teacher attrition and mobility: Results from the Teacher Follow-up Survey, 2000-01. Washington, D.C. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2005) by Hussar. W.J. Projections of Education Statistics to 2014 (NCES 2005-074). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/589 |