Mann, Stefan (2015): An activity choice approach towards pricing of 1:1 personal services – on the omnipresence of interpersonal utility comparisons.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_62516.pdf Download (344kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Currently, microeconomic theory is only of very limited use to understand price levels in the service sector. After a brief review of the literature on service pricing, this paper claims that price levels in the service sector are not only dependent on qualification levels, but also on the difference between the levels of non-monetary utility which customers on the one hand and providers on the other experience. An activity choice model shows why the ratio between utility differentials and prices should converge within a service segment. Theoretically, the approach finds a pragmatic alternative to the alleged impossibility of interpersonal utility comparisons in economic mainstream theory. Practically, it is able to explain the high price level for sex services compared with other service segments.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | An activity choice approach towards pricing of 1:1 personal services – on the omnipresence of interpersonal utility comparisons |
English Title: | An activity choice approach towards pricing of 1:1 personal services – on the omnipresence of interpersonal utility comparisons |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | activity choice; utility of work; service sector |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D46 - Value Theory J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J22 - Time Allocation and Labor Supply J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs > J31 - Wage Level and Structure ; Wage Differentials |
Item ID: | 62516 |
Depositing User: | Stefan Mann |
Date Deposited: | 04 Mar 2015 14:57 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 09:42 |
References: | Adriaenssens, S., J. Hendrickx (2012): Sex, price and preferences: accounting for unsafe sexual practices in prostitution markets. Sociology of Health and Illness 34 (5) 665-680 Blenker, P. (2001): From Principle to Context – or Context to Principle. University of Aarhus: Working Paper 2001-23 Carré, F.J. (2000): Nonstandard Work: The Nature and Challenges of Changing Employment Arrangements. Cornell University Press Cunningham, S., T.D. Kendall (2011): Prostitution 2.0: The changing face of sex work. Journal of Urban Economics 69 (3) 273-287 Desiraju, R., S.M. Shugan (1999): Strategic Service Pricing and Yield Management. Journal of Marketing 63 (1) 44-56 Diewald, M. (2004): Die neue Arbeitsgesellschaft als ICH-AG. In G. Nollmann, H. Strasser: Das individualisierte ich in der modernen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt: Campus Elsner, W., T. Heinrich, H. Schwardt (2015): The Microeconomics of Complex Economies. Amsterdam: Elsevier Essegaier, S., S. Gupta, Z.J. Zhang (2002): Pricing Access Services. Marketing Science 21 (2) 139-159 Faria, A., M.M. Abdalla: O que é (estratégia de) não mercado? Organizacoes & Sociedade 21 (69) http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-92302014000200007 (Feb 11, 2014) Gevers, L. (1979): On Interpersonal Comparability and Social Welfare Orderings. Econometrica 47 (1) 75-89 Habermas, J. (1981); The Theiory of Communicative Action: Vol. 1: Reason and Ratioonalization of Society. London: Heinemann Himmelweit, S. (2007): The prospects for caring: economic theory and policy analysis. Cambridge Journal of Economics 31 (4) 581-599 Groth J. (1995): Important factors in the sale and pricing of services. Management Decision 33 (7) 29-34 Gwinner, K.P., D.G. Gremler, M.J. Bitner (1998): Relational Benefits in Service Industries – the Customer’s Perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sciences 26 (2) 101-114 Kahneman, D., P.P. Wacker, R. Sarin (1997): Back to Bentham? Explorations of Experienced Utility. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (2) 375-406 Keaveney, S.M. (1995): Customer Switching Behavior in Service Industries. Journal of Marketing 59 (2) 71-82 Lewis, S. (2003): The integration of paid work and the rest of life. Is post‐industrial work the new leisure? Leisure Studies 22 (4) 343-345 Mann, S. (2007): Comparing Interpersonal Comparisons in Utility Theory and Happiness Research. Forum for Social Economics 36 (1) 29-42 Mann, S. (2013): "Work"? On utility in the market and in the unpaid sphere. Journal of Socio-Economics 45 (1) 86-91 Mann, S. (2015): Individual utility effects of minimum wages in a new activity-choice framework. Forum for Social Economics (in print) Moffatt, P.G., S.A. Peters (2004): Pricing personal services: an empirical study of earnings in the UK prostitution industry. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 51 (5) 675-691 Pagano, U. (1985): Work and Welfare in Economic Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Pareto, V. (1896) Cours d’économie politique. Vol. 2, Lausanne: F. Rouge Penning, J.E. (1998): The Market for Hedging Services: a marketing-finance approach. Wageningen: WAU Postigo, H. (2003): From Pong to Planet Quake: Post-Industrial Transitions from Leisure to Work. Information, Communication & Society 6 (4) 593-607 Richter, A., S. Niewim (2004): The Changing Balance of Power in the Consulting Market. Business Strategy Review 15 (1) 8-13 Robbins, L. (1938): Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility: A Comment. Economic Journal 48 (192) 635-641 Roberts, K.W.S. (1980): Interpersonal Comparability and Social Choice Theory. The Review of Economic Studies 47 (2) 421-439 Troy, L. (1990): Is the U.S. Unique in the Decline of Private Sector Unionism? Journal of Labor Research 11 (2) 111-143 Westermayer, T. (2006): Die Ich-AG im Walde. Berliner Journal für Soziologie 16 (2) 211-225 Williams, C.C. (2004): The Myth of Marketization - An Evaluation of the Persistence of Non-Market Activities in Advanced Economies. International Sociology 19 (4) 437-449 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/62516 |