Heller, Yuval and Mohlin, Erik (2014): Coevolution of Deception and Preferences: Darwin and Nash Meet Machiavelli.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_63012.pdf Download (589kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We develop a framework in which individuals preferences co-evolve with their abilities to deceive others regarding their preferences and intentions. We show that a pure outcome is stable, essentially if and only if it is an efficient Nash equilibrium. All individuals have the same deception ability in such a stable state. In contrast, there are non-pure outcomes in which non-Nash outcomes are played, and different deception abilities co-exist. We extend our model to study preferences that depend also on the opponent's type.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Coevolution of Deception and Preferences: Darwin and Nash Meet Machiavelli |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Evolution of Preferences; Indirect Evolutionary Approach, Theory of Mind; Depth of Reasoning; Deception. |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C72 - Noncooperative Games C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C73 - Stochastic and Dynamic Games ; Evolutionary Games ; Repeated Games |
Item ID: | 63012 |
Depositing User: | Yuval Heller |
Date Deposited: | 20 Mar 2015 14:11 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 14:32 |
References: | Abreu, D., and R. Sethi (2003): Evolutionary Stability in a Reputational Model of Bargaining, Games and Economic Behavior, 44(2), 195-216. Alger, I., and J. W. Weibull (2013): Homo Moralis, Preference Evolution under Incomplete Information and Assortative Matching,Econometrica, 81(6), 2269-2302. Banerjee, A., and J. W. Weibull (1995): Evolutionary Selection and Rational Be-havior, in Learning and Rationality in Economics, ed. by A. Kirman, and M. Salmon, pp. 343-363. Blackwell, Oxford. Bester, H., and W. Güth (1998): Is Altruism Evolutionarily Stable?,Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 34, 193-209. Bolle, F. (2000): Is Altruism Evolutionarily Stable? And Envy and Malevolence? Remarks on Bester and Güth,Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 42, 131-133. Bomze, I. M., and J. W. Weibull (1995): Does Neutral Stability imply Lyapunov Stability?,Games and Economic Behavior, 11(2), 173-192. Conlisk, J. (2001): Costly Predation and the Distribution of Competence, American Economic Review, 91(3), 475-484. Cressman, R. (1997): Local Stability of Smooth Selection Dynamics for Normal form Games, Mathematical Social Sciences, 34(1), 1-19. Dekel, E., J. C. Ely, and O. Yilankaya (2007): Evolution of Preferences, Review of Economic Studies, 74, 685-704. Dufwenberg, M., and W. Güth (1999): Indirect Evolution vs. Strategic Delegation: A Comparison of Two Approaches to Explaining economic institutions, European Journal of Political Economy, 15(2), 281-295. Dunbar, R. I. M. (1998): The Social Brain Hypothesis, Evolutionary Anthropology, 6, 178-190. Ellingsen, T. (1997): The Evolution of Bargaining Behavior,The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 581-602. Ely, J. C., and O. Yilankaya (2001): Nash Equilibrium and the Evolution of Preferences,Journal of Economic Theory, 97, 255-272. Fershtman, C., and Y. Weiss (1998): Social Rewards, Externalities and Stable Preferences, Journal of Public Economics, 70(1), 53-73. Frank, R. H. (1987): If Homo Economicus Could Choose his own Utility Function, Would He Want One with a Conscience?ת The American Economic Review, 77(4), 593-604. Friedman, D., and N. Singh (2009): Equilibrium Vengeance,Games and Economic Behavior, 66(2), 813-829. Gamba, A. (2013): Learning and Evolution of Altruistic Preferences in the Centipede Game,Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 85(C), 112-117. Güth, W. (1995): An Evolutionary Approach to Explaining Cooperative Behavior by Reciprocal Incentives,International Journal of Game Theory, 24(4), 323-344. Güth, W., and S. Napel (2006): Inequality Aversion in a Variety of Games: An Indirect Evolutionary Analysis,The Economic Journal, 116, 1037-1056. Güth, W., and M. E. Yaari (1992): Explaining Reciprocal Behavior in Simple Strategic Games: An Evolutionary Approach, in Explaining Process and Change, ed. by U. Witt, pp. 22-34. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI. Guttman, J. M. (2003): Repeated Interaction and the Evolution of Preferences for Reciprocity, The Economic Journal, 113(489), 631-656. Heifetz, A., C. Shannon, and Y. Spiegel (2007): What to Maximize if You Must, Journal of Economic Theory, 133(1), 31-57. Heller, Y. (2014): Three Steps Ahead,Forthcoming in Theoretical Economics. Heller, Y., and E. Mohlin (2014): Stable Observable Behavior,Working paper. Herold, F., and C. Kuzmics (2009): Evolutionary Stability of Discrimination under Observability,Games and Economic Behavior, 67, 542-551. Hines,W. G. S., and J.Maynard Smith (1979): Games Between Relatives, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 79(1), 19-30. Hofbauer, J., and W. H. Sandholm (2009): Stable Games and Their Dynamics, Journal of Economic Theory, 144(4), 1665-1693. Hofbauer, J., and K. Sigmund (1988): The Theory of Evolution and Dynamical Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Holloway, R. (1996): Evolution of the Human Brain,in Handbook of Human Symbolic Evolution, ed. by A. Lock, and C. R. Peters, pp. 74-125. Clarendon Press, Oxford. Hopkins, E. (2014): Competitive Altruism, Mentalizing and Signalling,Forthcoming. in American Economic Journal: Microeconomics. Huck, S., and J. Oechssler (1999): The Indirect Evolutionary Approach to Explaining Fair Allocations,Games and Economic Behavior, 28, 13-24. Humphrey, N. K. (1976): The Social Function of Intellect, in Growing Points in Ethology, ed. by P. P. G. Bateson, and R. A. Hinde, pp. 303-317. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Kim, Y.-G., and J. Sobel (1995): An Evolutionary Approach to Pre-Play Communication, Econometrica, 63(5), 1181-1193. Kimborough, E. O., N. Robalino, and A. J. Robson (2014): The Evolution of "Theory of Mind": Theory and Experiments,Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper No. 1907R, Yale University. Kinderman, P., R. I. M. Dunbar, and R. P. Bentall (1998): Theory-of-Mind Deficits and Causal Attributions,British Journal of Psychology, 89, 191-204. Koçkcesen, L., and E. A. Ok (2000): Evolution of Interdependent Preferences in Aggregative Games,Games and Economic Behavior, 31, 303-310. Maynard Smith, J. (1982): Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Maynard Smith, J., and G. R. Price (1973): The Logic of Animal Conflict, Nature, 246(5427), 15-18. Mohlin, E. (2010): Internalized Social Norms in Conflicts: An Evolutionary Approach,Economics of Governance, 11(2), 169-181. Mohlin, E. (2012): Evolution of Theories of Mind,Games and Economic Behavior, 75(1), 299-312. Moulin, H., and J. Vial (1978): Strategically Zero-Sum Games: The Class of Games whose Completely Mixed Equilibria Cannot be Improved Upon,International Journal of Game Theory, 7(3), 201-221. Norman, T. W. L. (2012): Equilibrium Selection and the Dynamic Evolution of Preferences,Games and Economic Behavior, 74(1), 311-320. Ok, E. A., and F. Vega-Redondo (2001): On the Evolution of Individualistic Preferences: An Incomplete Information Scenario,Journal of Economic Theory, 97, 231-254. Possajennikov, A. (2000): On the Evolutionary Stability of Altruistic and Spiteful Preferences,Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 42, 125-129. Premack, D., and G. Woodruff (1979): Does the Chimpanzee have a Theory of Mind,Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 515-526. Robson, A. J. (1990): Efficiency in Evolutionary Games: Darwin, Nash and the Secret Handshake,Journal of Theoretical Biology, 144(3), 379-396. Robson, A. J., and L. Samuelson (2011): The Evolutionary Foundations of Preferences,in The Social Economics Handbook, ed. by J. Benhabib, A. Bisin, and M. Jackson, pp. 221-310. North Holland. Rtischev, D. (2012): Evolution of Mindsight, Transparency and Rule-Rationality, Working Paper, MPRA. Samuelson, L. (1991): Limit Evolutionarily Stable Strategies in Two-Player, Normal Form Games,Games and Economic Behavior, 3(1), 110-128. Samuelson, L. (2001): Introduction to the Evolution of Preferences, Journal of Economic Theory, 97(2), 225-230. Sandholm, W. H. (2001): Preference Evolution, Two-Speed Dynamics, and Rapid Social Change, Review of Economic Dynamics, 4, 637-679. Sandholm, W. H. (2010): Local Stability under Evolutionary Game Dynamics, Theoretical Economics, 5(1), 27-50. Schaffer, M. E. (1988): Evolutionarily Stable Strategies for a Finite Population and a Variable Contest Size, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 132, 469-478. Schelling, T. C. (1960): The Strategy of Conflict. Harvard University Press. Schlag, K. H. (1993): Cheap Talk and Evolutionary Dynamics,Bonn Department of Economics Discussion Paper B-242. Selten, R. (1980): A Note on Evolutionarily Stable Strategies in Asymmetric Animal Conflicts, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 84(1), 93-101. Sethi, R., and E. Somanthan (2001): Preference Evolution and Reciprocity, Journal of Economic Theory, 97, 273-297. Stahl, D. O. (1993): Evolution of Smartn Players,Games and Economic Behavior, 5(4), 604-617. Stennek, J. (2000): The Survival Value of Assuming Others to be Rational,International Journal of Game Theory, 29, 147-163. Taylor, P. D., and L. B. Jonker (1978): Evolutionary Stable Strategies and Game dynamics,Mathematical Biosciences, 40(12), 145-156. Thomas, B. (1985): On Evolutionarily Stable Sets,Journal of Mathematical Biology, 22(1), 105-115. Wärneryd, K. (1991): Evolutionary Stability in Unanimity Games with Cheap Talk, Economics Letters, 36(4), 375-378. Wärneryd, K. (1998): Communication, Complexity, and Evolutionary Stability, International Journal of Game Theory, 27(4), 599-609. Weissing, Franz, J. (1991): Evolutionary Stability and Dynamic Stability in a Class of Evolutionary Normal Form Games,in Game Equilibrium Models I. Evolution and Game Dynamics, ed. by R. Selten, pp. 29-97. Springer. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/63012 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Coevolution of Deception and Preferences: Darwin and Nash Meet Machiavelli. (deposited 06 Sep 2014 10:07)
- Coevolution of Deception and Preferences: Darwin and Nash Meet Machiavelli. (deposited 20 Mar 2015 14:11) [Currently Displayed]