Polterovich (Полтерович), Victor (Виктор) (2013): Приватизация и рациональная структура собственности. Часть 2. Рационализация структуры собственности. Published in: Actual Problems of Economics , Vol. 60, No. 1 (20 January 2013): pp. 7-24.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_64168.pdf Download (425kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In the first part of the paper, it was shown that decisions on privatization have to be considered in the context of more general problem of finding a rational property structure in an economy. The second part demonstrates that public enterprises fulfill a number of special functions which are particularly important for developing resource abundant countries. Particularly, they can play a role of the modernization agents which initiate large scale projects in the frameworks of public-private partnerships. A concept of stationary property structure is introduced. A set of stationary structures exists under given conditions; the ”volume” of the set depends on transformation costs of privatization. This explains path-dependence of the observed structures. Some principles of the governance of the property structure are suggested which are supported by the analysis of the Norway experience. The causes of the cyclicity of the privatization policies are discussed, and the reasons of the coming mass privatization in Russia are analyzed. Recommendations are formulated to increase the efficiency of the Russian state sector governance.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Приватизация и рациональная структура собственности. Часть 2. Рационализация структуры собственности. |
English Title: | Privatization and the rational ownership structure. Part 2: rationalization of the ownership structure |
Language: | Russian |
Keywords: | state sector governance, industrial policy, transformation cost, stationary ownership structure, Norway experience , NP- cycles, mass privatization. |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D02 - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D04 - Microeconomic Policy: Formulation, Implementation, and Evaluation E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E0 - General > E02 - Institutions and the Macroeconomy H - Public Economics > H1 - Structure and Scope of Government > H11 - Structure, Scope, and Performance of Government H - Public Economics > H8 - Miscellaneous Issues > H82 - Governmental Property O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development P - Economic Systems > P5 - Comparative Economic Systems |
Item ID: | 64168 |
Depositing User: | Victor Polterovich |
Date Deposited: | 06 May 2015 15:01 |
Last Modified: | 06 Oct 2019 00:05 |
References: | Авдашева С.Б., Долгопятова Т.Г., Пляйнес Х. Корпоративное управление в АО с государственным участием: российские проблемы в контексте мирового опыта. Препринт. М.: Издательский дом ГУ-ВШЭ, 2007. Дементьев В. Е. Структура корпоративной системы и длинные волны в экономике. М.: ЦЭМИ РАН, 2011. Мальгинов Г. Н., Радыгин А. Д. Смешанная собственность в корпоративном секторе: эволюция, управление, регулирование. М.: ИЭПП, 2007. О Концепции управления государственным имуществом и приватизации в Российской Федерации. Постановление Правительства РФ от 09.09.1999 N 1024 (ред. от 29.11.2000). Полтерович В. М. Элементы теории реформ. М.: Экономика, 2007. Полтерович В., Попов В. Эволюционная теория экономической политики. Часть II. Необходимость своевременного переключения. // Вопросы экономики, No 7, 2006. Полтерович В. М. Приватизация и рациональная структура собственности. Часть 1. Приватизация: проблема эффективности. // Экономическая наука современной России. No. 4, 2012. Приватизация будет проведена рационально. // Коммерсантъ, No103 (4888), 08.06. 2012. Рейтинг программ инновационного развития госкорпораций и компаний с государственным участием М.: Рейтинговое агентство «Эксперт РА» // http://www.raexpert.ru/researches/pir_2012/pir_2012.pdf, 2012. Российский статистический ежегодник 2011. М.: Росстат. // http://www.gks.ru/bgd/regl/b11_13/Main.htm, 2012. Рубинштейн А. Я. К теории опекаемых благ. Неэффективные и эффективные равновесия. // Вопросы экономики, No3, 2011. Федеральный закон от 14.11.2002 N 161-ФЗ (ред. от 30.11.2011). О государственных и муниципальных унитарных предприятиях. // http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc;base=LAW;n=122426 Шпренгер К. (2010a). Государственная собственность в российской экономике. Часть 1. Масштаб и распределение по секторам. // Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации, No 6, 2010. Шпренгер К. (2010 b). Государственная собственность в российской экономике. Часть 2. Проблемы управления и влияние на эффективность. // Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации, No 7, 2010. Annual Report. State-owned companies 2010. Government Offices of Sweden. Ministry of Finance, 2010. Biais, B., and E.C. Perotti. Machiavellian privatization. // American Economic Review, 92, 240- 58, 2002.  Bortolotti, B. and V. Milelli. Privatization in Western Europe. Stylized Facts, Obtcomes, and Open Issues. // Foundazione Eni Enrico Mattei. Nota Di Lavorno, 124, 2006. Bortolotti, B., and P. Pinotti. The political economy of privatization, FEEM // Note di Lavoro, 45, 2003. Chang, Roberto, Constantino Hevia, Norman Loayza. Privatization and Nationalization Cycles. // World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5029, 2009. Chong, Alberto, Florencio López-de-Silanes. The Truth about Privatization in Latin America. // Inter-American Development Bank , Yale University and NBER, Working Paper #R-486, 2003. Christiansen, Hans. The size and composition of the SOE sector in OECD countries. OECD corporate governance working papers, NO.5 // http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/55/42/48512721.pdf, 2011. Chua, Amy. The Privatization-Nationalization Cycle: The Link Between Markets and Ethnicity in Developing Countries. // Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 342. // http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/342, 1995. Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprises. A Survey of OECD countries. Paris, OECD, 2005. Moderating Risks, Bolstering Growth. // The World Bank in Russia. Russian Economic Report No 27. April. World Bank // http://www.worldbank.org/eca/rer, 2012. Nellis, John. The World Bank, Privatization and Enterprise Reform in Transition Economies: A Retrospective Analysis. Washington, D. C The World Bank. // http://www- wds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2002/03/22//000094946_0203 0804050325/Rendered/INDEX/multi0page.txt, 2002. OECD Guidelines on Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprises. Paris: OECD, 2005. Polterovich V. Towards the Theory of Privatization. Central Economic-Mathematical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences. Working Paper, 1996. Siegmund, Uwe. Are there nationalization-privatization cycles? A theoretical survey and first empirical evidence. // Kiel Working Papers, No. 757 // http://hdl.handle.net/10419/46855, 1996. The Government’s Ownership Policy. Norwegian Ministry of Trade and Industry, 2008. The State’s Ownership Report 2010. Norwegian Ministry of Trade and Industry, 2011. Wicken, Olav. The Norwegian Path.Creating Resources and Building Enabling Sectors. // Working Paper.Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture. University of Oslo. October, 2010. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/64168 |