Devising futures for universities in a multi-level structure: A methodological experiment

Havas, Attila (2007): Devising futures for universities in a multi-level structure: A methodological experiment. Published in: Technological Forecasting & Social Change , Vol. 75, No. 4 (May 2015): pp. 558-582.

Abstract

Universities have traditionally been key players in producing and validating new scientific knowledge, but other actors have also become major research performers. Meanwhile, the notion of research has been extended considerably, and the environment of universities is also undergoing fundamental changes. Thus, it is timely to consider alternative futures for them, to be better prepared for their new roles. A review of recent works on the future of higher education shows that the starting point in these exercises is either an existing or an abstract university. This approach has three major shortcomings: (i) the broader socio-economic systems, in which universities operate, are not addressed in these analyses, and thus neither the potential changes in these broader settings, nor their impacts on higher education can be explored; (ii) the huge diversity of higher education systems and individual universities cannot be reflected; (iii) the role of other research actors, and more importantly, the links among universities and those other research players are often disregarded. This article offers an alternative approach, using the case of EU universities as an example, to rectify these shortcomings. A set of ‘cascading’ visions are devised to demonstrate the close links between three levels. First, alternative futures are developed for the EU by considering (i) the overall rationale of EU policies; and (ii) the standing of the EU vis-à-vis the Triad. Second, the different directions are identified, in which the European Research and Innovation Area can evolve. Third, skipping the national level, futures are built for the universities themselves, focussing on their research activities. The modest intention of the futures presented in this paper is to demonstrate how to use the proposed new approach, and initiate meaningful and lively dialogues among stakeholders. Their diverse accumulated knowledge and experience, as well as distinct viewpoints are indispensable for building policy-relevant visions. The proposed three-level structure of futures – or ‘cascading’ visions – offer several advantages for policy-makers at various levels, the stakeholders of universities, as well as academics interested in prospective analysis of innovation systems.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Alternative futures for the EU; The European Research and Innovation Area (ERIA) and universities; Trends and drivers for changes; Multi-level governance
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I23 - Higher Education ; Research Institutions; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I28 - Government Policy; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O38 - Government Policy; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O52 - Europe

References

[1] David, P.A.: Europe’s Universities and Innovation – Past, present and future, SIEPR Discussion Paper No. 06-10, 2006

[2] EC: The role of universities in the Europe of knowledge, Communication from the Commission, COM(2003) 58 final, Brussels, 5 February 2003

[3] EC: The European Research Area: New perspectives, Green Paper, COM(2007) 161, 4 April 2007

[4] OECD: Four Futures Scenarios for Higher Education, OECD CERI, presented at the meeting of OECD Education Ministers, Athens, 27-28 June 2006

[5] Vincent-Lancrin, S: What is changing in academic research? Trends and futures scenarios, European Journal of Education, 41(2), 169-202 (2006)

[6] Aghion, Ph. et al.: Why Reform Europe’s Universities?, bruegelpolicybrief, issue 2007/04

[7] STRATA-ETAN expert group: Higher education and research for the ERA: Current trends and challenges for the near future, final report, EC DG Research Unit RTD-K.2, October 2002

[8] LERU: Universities and innovation: the challenge for Europe, League of European Research Universities, November 2006

[9] Georghiou, L., and Cassingena Harper, J.: The Higher Education Sector and its Role in Research: Status and impact of Future-Oriented Technology Analysis, anchor paper for the Second International Seminar on Future-Oriented Technology Analysis: Impact of FTA Approaches on Policy and Decision-Making, Seville, 28-29 September 2006

[10] Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R. R., Silverberg, G., and Soete, L. eds.: Technical Change and Economic Theory, Pinter, London, 1988

[11] Edquist, C. ed.: Systems of Innovations: Technologies, institutions and organizations, Pinter, London, 1997

[12] Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., and Nelson, R. R. eds.: The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford UP, Oxford, 2005

[13] Freeman, C.: The economics of technical change: A critical survey, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 18(5), 463-514 (1994)

[14] Lundvall, B-Å., Borrás, S.: The Globalising Learning Economy: Implications for Innovation Policy, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 1999

[15] OECD: New Rationale and Approaches in Technology and Innovation Policy, STI Review, No. 22 (1998)

[16] OECD: Benchmarking industry-science relationships, OECD, Paris, 2002

[17] Polt, W., Rammer, C., Gassler, H., Schibany, A., and Schartinger, D.: Benchmarking industry-science relations: the role of framework conditions, Science and Public Policy, 28(4), 247-258 (2001)

[18] EUROPOLIS: The European Research Area: A new frontier for Europe?, la lettre OST, No. 22, 2001

[19] Georghiou, L.: Evolving frameworks for European collaboration in research and technology, Research Policy, 30(6), 891-903 (2001)

[20] Kuhlmann, S.: Future governance of innovation policy in Europe – three scenarios, Research Policy, 30(6), 953-976 (2001)

[21] Havas, A.: Futures for Universities, paper presented at the Second International Seminar on Future-Oriented Technology Analysis: Impact of FTA Approaches on Policy and Decision-Making, Seville, 28-29 September 2006

[22] Nelson, Richard R.: The market economy, and the scientific commons, Research Policy, 33(3), 455-471 (2004)

[23] EC: Frontier Research: The European Challenge, HLEG report, DG Research, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 2005

[24] OECD: Frascati Manual: Proposed standard practice for surveys on research and experimental development, OECD, Paris, 2002

[25] Stokes, D. E.: Pasteur’s Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C., 1997

[26] von Hippel, E.: The Sources of Innovation, Oxford UP, Oxford, 1988

[27] Akrich, M., and Miller, R.: The Future of Research Actors in the European Research Area, synthesis paper, HLEG on The Future of Key Research Actors in the European Research Area, 2006

[28] Bonaccorsi, A.: The changing role of researchers in Europe, 2020, contribution to the HLEG on The Future of Key Research Actors in the European Research Area, 2005

[29] Etzkowitz, H., and Leysdorff, L.: The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations, Research Policy 29(2), 109-123 (2000)

[30] Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., and Trow, M.: The new production of knowledge, Sage Publications, London, 1994

[31] Sanz-Menéndez, L.: The Future of Key Actors in the European Research Area: Regional governments, contribution to the HLEG on The Future of Key Research Actors in the European Research Area, 2005

[32] Bonaccorsi, A. and Daraio C. (eds): Universities and Strategic Knowledge Creation: Specialization and Performance in Europe, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2007

[33] Pavitt, K.: What makes basic research economically useful?, Research Policy, 20(2), 109-119 (1991)

[34] Pavitt, K.: The social shaping of the national science base, Research Policy, 27(8), 793-805 (1998)

[35] Salter, A. J., and Martin, B. R.: The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review, Research Policy, 30(3), 509-532 (2001)

[36] Kehm, B.: Governance and strategy, presentation at a workshop on “Driving Forces and Challenges for the European University”, Brussels, 23-24 March 2006

[37] Smith, A. and Webster, F.: Changing Ideas of the University, in: The Postmodern University? Contested visions of higher education in society. A. Smith and F. Webster eds., Open University Press, Buckingham; reprinted in: Universities in the Future. M. Thorne, ed., Foresight, OST, DTI, London, 1999

[38] EC: Third European Report on Science & Technology Indicators 2003: Towards a knowledge-based economy, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 2003

[39] OECD: Main Science and Technology Indicators, OECD, Paris, various years

[40] Thorne, M. (ed.): Universities in the Future, Foresight, OST, DTI, London, 1999

[41] Alesi, B., Bürger, S., Kehm, B., and Teichler, U.: Bachelor and Master Courses in Selected Countries Compared with Germany, Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Bonn, 2005

[42] Dosi, G., Llerena, P., and Sylos Labini, M.: The relationships between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: An illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called ‘European Paradox’, Research Policy, 35(10), 1450-64 (2006)

[43] EC: Key Figures 2005, Towards a European Research Area, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 2005

[44] EC: Cohesion Policy in Support of Growth and Jobs: Community Strategic Guidelines, 2007-2013, COM(2005) 0299

[45] Sharp, M.: Competitiveness and cohesion – are the two compatible?, Research Policy, 27(6), 569-588 (1998)

[46] Aiginger, K.: Copying the US or developing a New European Model – Policy strategies of successful European countries in the nineties, paper presented at the UN-ECE Spring Seminar 2004: Competitiveness and economic growth in the ECE region, Geneva, 23 February, 2004

[47] Aiginger, K., and Guger, A.: The European Socio-economic Model: Differences to the USA and changes over time, WIFO, 2005

[48] Romanainen, J.: National governments, contribution to the DG Research expert group on The Future of Key Research Actors in the European Research Area, 2005