A Cost System Approach to the Stochastic Directional Technology Distance Function with Undesirable Outputs: The Case of U.S. Banks in 2001-2010

Malikov, Emir and Kumbhakar, Subal C. and Tsionas, Efthymios (2015): A Cost System Approach to the Stochastic Directional Technology Distance Function with Undesirable Outputs: The Case of U.S. Banks in 2001-2010.

Abstract

This paper offers a methodology to address the endogeneity of inputs in the directional technology distance function (DTDF) based formulation of banking technology which explicitly accommodates the presence of undesirable nonperforming loans --- an inherent characteristic of the bank's production due to its exposure to credit risk. Specifically, we model nonperforming loans as an undesirable output in the bank's production process. Since the stochastic DTDF describing banking technology is likely to suffer from the endogeneity of inputs, we propose addressing this problem by considering a system consisting of the DTDF and the first-order conditions from the bank's cost minimization problem. The first-order conditions also allow us to identify the "cost-optimal" directional vector for the banking DTDF, thus eliminating the uncertainty associated with an ad hoc choice of the direction. We apply our cost system approach to the data on large U.S. commercial banks for the 2001-2010 period, which we estimate via Bayesian MCMC methods subject to theoretical regularity conditions. We document dramatic distortions in banks' efficiency, productivity growth and scale elasticity estimates when the endogeneity of inputs is assumed away and/or the DTDF is fitted in an arbitrary direction.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Bad Outputs, Commercial Banks, Directional Distance Function, Endogeneity, MCMC, Nonperforming Loans, Productivity, Technical Change
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C11 - Bayesian Analysis: General; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C33 - Panel Data Models ; Spatio-temporal Models; D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D24 - Production ; Cost ; Capital ; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity ; Capacity; G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services > G21 - Banks ; Depository Institutions ; Micro Finance Institutions ; Mortgages

References

Altunbas, Y., Liu, M-H, M. P., and Seth, R. (2000). Efficiency and risk in Japanese banking. Journal of Banking & Finance, 24:1605-1628.

Assaf, A. G., Matousek, R., and Tsionas, E. G. (2013). Turkish bank efficiency: Bayesian estimation with undesirable outputs. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37:506-517.

Atkinson, S. E., Primont, D., and Tsionas, E. G. (2014). Estimation of efficient production using optimal directions with multiple inputs and outputs. Working Paper, Southern Illinois University.

Atkinson, S. E. and Tsionas, E. G. (2013). Directional distance functions: Optimal endogenous directions. Working Paper, Athens University of Economics and Business.

Barnett, W. A. (2002). Tastes and technology: Curvature is not sufficient for regularity. Journal of Econometrics, 108:199-202.

Barnett, W. A., Geweke, J., and Wolfe, M. (1991). Seminonparametric Bayesian estimation of the Asymptotically Ideal Production Model. Journal of Econometrics, 49:5-50.

Berger, A. N. (2004). The economic effects of technological progress: Evidence from the banking industry. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 35(2):141-176.

Berger, A. N., Demsetz, R. S., and Strahan, P. E. (1999). The consolidation of the financial services industry: Causes, consequences, and the implications for the future. Journal of Banking & Finance, 23(2-4):135-194.

Berger, A. N. and Mester, L. J. (1997). Inside the black box: What explains differences in the efficiencies of financial institutions? Journal of Banking & Finance, 21(7):895-947.

Berger, A. N. and Mester, L. J. (2003). Explaining the dramatic changes in performance of US banks: Technological change, deregulation, and dynamic changes in competition. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 12(1):57-95.

Chambers, R. G., Chung, Y., and Fare, R. (1996). Benefit and distance functions. Journal of Economic Theory, 70:407-419.

Chambers, R. G., Chung, Y., and Fare, R. (1998). Profit, directional distance functions, and Nerlovian efficiency. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 98:351-364.

Chung, Y., Fare, R., and Grosskopf, S. (1997). Productivity and undesirable outputs: A directional distance function approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 51:229-240.

Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., Noh, D.-W., and Weber, W. (2005). Characteristics of a polluting technology: Theory and practice. Journal of Econometrics, 126:469-492.

Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., and Whittaker, G. (2013). Directional output distance functions: Endogenous directions based on exogenous normalization constraints. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 40:267-269.

Fare, R. and Primont, D. (1995). Multi-Output Production and Duality: Theory and Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell.

Feng, G. and Serletis, A. (2009). Efficiency and productivity of the US banking industry, 1998-2005: Evidence from the Fourier cost function satisfying global regularity conditions. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 24(1):105-138.

Feng, G. and Serletis, A. (2010). Efficiency, technical change, and returns to scale in large US banks: Panel data evidence from an output distance function satisfying theoretical regularity. Journal of Banking & Finance, pp. 127-138.

Feng, G. and Serletis, A. (2014). Undesirable outputs and a primal Divisia productivity index based on the directional output distance function. Journal of Econometrics. forthcoming.

Feng, G. and Zhang, X. (2012). Productivity and efficiency at large and community banks in the US: A Bayesian true random effects stochastic distance frontier analysis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(7):1883-1895.

Freixas, X. and Rochet, J. (2008). Microeconomics of Banking. The MIT Press, Cambridge.

Guarda, P., Rouabah, A., and Vardanyan, M. (2013). Identifying bank outputs and inputs with a directional technology distance function. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 40:185-195.

Hampf, B. and Kruger, J. J. (2014). Optimal directions for directional distance functions: An exploration of potential reductions of greenhouse gases. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. forthcoming.

Hudgins, L. B. and Primont, D. (2007). Derivative properties of directional technology distance functions. In Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., and Primont, D., editors, Aggregation, Efficiency, and Measurement. Springer.

Hughes, J. P. and Mester, L. J. (1993). A quality and risk-adjusted cost function for banks: Evidence on the “too-big- to-fail” doctrine. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 4(3):293-315.

Hughes, J. P. and Mester, L. J. (1998). Bank capitalization and cost: Evidence of scale economies in risk management and signaling. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(2):314-325.

Hughes, J. P. and Mester, L. J. (2010). Efficiency in banking: Theory and evidence. In Berger, A., Molyneux, P., and Wilson, J., editors, Oxford Handbook of Banking. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1 edition.

Hughes, J. P. and Mester, L. J. (2013). Who said large banks don't experience scale economies? Evidence from a risk-return-driven cost function. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 22(4):559-585.

Koutsomanoli-Filippaki, A., Margaritis, D., and Staikouras, C. (2009). Efficiency and productivity growth in the banking industry of Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33:557-567.

Kumbhakar, S. C., Wang, H.-J., and Horncastle, A. P. (2015). A Practitioner's Guide to Stochastic Frontier Analysis using Stata. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Malikov, E., Kumbhakar, S. C., and Tsionas, E. G. (2015a). Bayesian approach to disentangling technical and environmental productivity. Econometrics, 3(2):443-465.

Malikov, E., Restrepo-Tobon, D., and Kumbhakar, S. C. (2015b). Estimation of banking technology under credit uncertainty. Empirical Economics, 49(1):185-211.

Park, K. H. and Weber, W. L. (2006). A note on efficiency and productivity growth in the Korean banking industry, 1992{2002. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30:2371-2386.

Restrepo-Tobon, D. A. and Kumbhakar, S. C. (2014). Nonparametric estimation of returns to scale using input distance functions: An application to large U.S. banks. Empirical Economics. forthcoming.

Schmidt, P. and Lovell, C. A. K. (1979). Estimating technical and allocative inefficiency relative to stochastic production and cost frontiers. Journal of Econometrics, 9:343-366.

Sealey, C. W. and Lindley, J. T. (1977). Inputs, outputs, and a theory of production and cost at depository financial institutions. Journal of Finance, 32(4):1251-1266.

Tsionas, E. G., Malikov, E., and Kumbhakar, S. C. (2014). Do direction, normalization and the Jacobian matter in the productivity measurements based on the directional distance function? Working Paper, Binghamton University.

Zelenyuk, V. (2013). A scale elasticity measure for directional distance function and its dual: Theory and DEA application. European Journal of Operational Research, 228:592-600.