A Discontinuity Model of Technological Change: Catastrophe Theory and Network Structure

Heinrich, Torsten (2015): A Discontinuity Model of Technological Change: Catastrophe Theory and Network Structure.

Abstract

Discontinuities as a crucial aspect of economic systems have been discussed both verbally - particularly in institutionalist theory - and formally, chiefly using catastrophe theory. Catastrophe theory has, however, been criticized heavily for lacking micro-foundations and has mainly fallen out of use in economics and social sciences. The present paper proposes a simple catastrophe theory model of technological change with network externalities and reevaluates the value of such a model by adding an agent-based micro layer. To this end an agent-based variant of the model is proposed and investigated specifically with regard to the network structure among the agents. While the macro level of the model produces a classical cusp catastrophe - a result that is preserved in the agent-based form - it is found that the behavior of the model changes locally depending on the network structure, especially if networks with features that resemble social networks (low diameter, high clustering, power law distributed node degree) are considered. While the present work investigates merely an aspect out of a large possibility space, it encourages further research using agent-based catastrophe theory models especially of economic aspects to which catastrophe theory has previously successfully been applied; aspects such as technological and institutional change, economic crises, or industry structure.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: network structures; agent-based modeling; catastrophe theory; information and communication technology; preferential attachment networks; technological change
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C63 - Computational Techniques ; Simulation Modeling; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D85 - Network Formation and Analysis: Theory; L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L14 - Transactional Relationships ; Contracts and Reputation ; Networks; L - Industrial Organization > L8 - Industry Studies: Services > L86 - Information and Internet Services ; Computer Software

References

Arthur, W. B., 1989. Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Economic Journal 99 (394), 116–31.

Arthur, W. B., Ermoliev, Y. M., Kaniovski, Y. M., 1987. Path dependent processes and the emergence of macro-structure. European Journal of Operational Research 30, 294–303.

Barabási, A.-L., Albert, R., 1999. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286 (5439), 509–512.

Barash, V., Cameron, C., Macy, M., 2012. Critical phenomena in complex contagions. Social Networks 34 (4), 451 – 461.

Buendı́a, F., 2013. Self-organizing market structures, system dynamics, and urn theory. Complexity 18 (4), 28–40.

Dahui, W., Li, Z., Zengru, D., 2006. Bipartite producer–consumer networks and the size distribution of firms. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 363 (2), 359 – 366.

David, P. A., 1985. Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review 75 (2), 332–337.

Dolfsma, W., Leydesdorff, L., 2009. Lock-in and break-out from technological trajectories: Modeling and policy implications. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 76 (7), 932 – 941.

Dosi, G., 1982. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy 11 (3), 147 – 162.

Dou, W., Ghose, S., 2006. A dynamic nonlinear model of online retail competition using cusp catastrophe theory. Journal of Business Research 59 (7), 838 – 848.

Dunbar, R. I. M., 1993. Coevolution of neocortical size, group size and language in humans. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (04), 681–694.

Freeman, C., Perez, C., 1988. Structural crisis of adjustment, business cycles and investment behaviour. In: Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G., Soete, L. (Eds.), Technological Change and Economic Theory. Pinter Publishers, London, N.Y., pp. 38–66.

Gatti, D. D., Guilmi, C. D., Gaffeo, E., Giulioni, G., Gallegati, M., Palestrini, A., 2005. A new approach to business fluctuations: heterogeneous interacting agents, scaling laws and financial fragility. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 56 (4), 489 – 512, festschrift in honor of Richard H. Day.

Herbig, P. A., 1991. A cusp catastrophe model of the adoption of an industrial innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management 8 (2), 127 – 137.

Lange, R., Mcdade, S. R., Oliva, T. A., 2004. The estimation of a cusp model to describe the adoption of Word for Windows. Journal of Product Innovation Management 21 (1), 15–32.

Myrdal, G., 1974. What is development? Journal of Economic Issues 8 (4), 729–736.

Newman, M. E. J., 2005. Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf’s law. Contemporary Physics 46 (5), 323–351.

Nowak, M. A., 2006. Evolutionary dynamics: exploring the equations of life. Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass.

Rosser, J. B., 2000. From Catastrophe to Chaos: A General Theory of Economic Discontinuities: Mathematics, Microeconomics and Finance. Springer, New York.

Rosser, J. B., 2007. The rise and fall of catastrophe theory applications in economics: Was the baby thrown out with the bathwater? Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 31 (10), 3255 – 3280.

Saunders, P. T., 1980. An introduction to catastrophe theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Schnettler, S., 2009. A structured overview of 50 years of small-world research. Social Networks 31 (3), 165 – 178.

Sewell, M. J., 1977. Elementary catastrophe theory. In: Branin Jr., F., Huseyin, K. (Eds.), Problem Analyses in Science and Engineering. Academic Press, New York, pp. 391–426.

Silverberg, G., Lehnert, D., 1993. Long waves and ‘evolutionary chaos’ in a simple Schumpeterian model of embodied technical change. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 4 (1), 9 – 37.

Silverberg, G., Verspagen, B., 2005. A percolation model of innovation in complex technology spaces. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 29 (1-2), 225 – 244.

Stephen, A. T., Toubia, O., 2009. Explaining the power-law degree distribution in a social commerce network. Social Networks 31 (4), 262 – 270.

Thom, R., 1975. Structural stability and morphogenesis: an outline of a general theory of models. The Advanced Book Program. W. A. Benjamin, Reading, MA, USA, translated from French by D.H. Fowler.

Veblen, T. B., 1898. Why is economics not an evolutionary science? The Quarterly Journal of Economics 12 (4), 373–397.

Veblen, T. B., 2008 [1899]. Theory of the Leisure Class. Project Gutenberg. URL http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/83336435

Watts, D. J., Strogatz, S. H., Jun. 1998. Collective dynamics of ’small world’ networks. Nature 393 (6684), 440–442.

Windrum, P., 2003. Unlocking a lock-in: Towards a model of technological succession. In: Saviotti, P. P. (Ed.), Applied Evolutionary Economics New Empirical Methods and Simulation Techniques. Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc., Cheltenham, UK.

Woodcock, A., Davis, M., 1978. Catastrophe Theory: A Revolutionary New Way of Understanding How Things Change. Dutton, New York.