Schmitt, Rebecca (2015): Bridging the Attitude-Preference-Gap: A Cognitive Approach To Preference Formation.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_68480.pdf Download (276kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper provides a descriptive decision model that is based on a single behavioral pattern: human beings strive for consistency between what they do, what they think and what they perceive. This pattern manifests in the decision maker’s aim to bring his attitudes, beliefs and behavior into balance. Drawing principally on the theory of cognitive dissonance by Festinger (1957), the model shows how the concept of attitudes and the concept of preferences are interwoven by the human need for consistency. It closes the conceptual gap between preferences and attitudes. The model is an alternative approach to additive utility models, such as the one by Fehr and Schmidt (1999). Models of this class are not capable of explaining behavioral discontinuities in the mini ultimatum game. In contrast, the attitude-based model covers this behavioral pattern.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Bridging the Attitude-Preference-Gap: A Cognitive Approach To Preference Formation |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Preference Formation, Attitudes, Cognitive Dissonance, Preference Reversal, Additive Utility, Ultimatum Game |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D11 - Consumer Economics: Theory Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology |
Item ID: | 68480 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Rebecca Schmitt |
Date Deposited: | 23 Dec 2015 05:35 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 18:49 |
References: | Ajzen, Icek. 2001. “Nature and operation of attitudes”. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 2001, 27-58. Akerlof, George A. and Dickens, William T. 1982. “The Economic Consequences of Cognitive Dissonance”. The American Economic Review, June 1982, 207-294. Binmore, Ken; Shaked, Avner. 2010. “Experimental Economics: Where Next?” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 73, 87-100. Bolton, Gray E; Ockenfels, Axel. 2000. „ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition”. The American Economic Review, Bd. 90, No.1, 2000, 166-193. Charness, Gary and Rabin, Matthew. 2000. “Social Preferences: Some Simple Tests and a New Model”. Institute of Business and Economic Research, Paper E00-283. Engel, Christoph; Zhurakhovska Lilia. 2013. “When is the Risk of Cooperation worth Taking? The Prisoner’s Dilemma as a Game of Multiple Motives”. Reprints of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods. 2012/16. Revised version August 2013. Epstein, Larry G. and Kopylov, Igor. 2005. “Cognitive Dissonance and Choice”. Working Paper. Falk, Armin; Fischbacher, Urs. 2000. “A Theory of Reciprocity”. Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich, Working Paper No. 6. Fehr, Ernst; Schmidt, Klaus M. 1999. „A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation”. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114 (3), 817-868. Festinger, Leon. 1957. “A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance”. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. Fishburn, Peter C. 1992. “A General Axiomatization of Additive Measurement with Applications”. Naval Research Logistics, Vol. 39, 741-755. Güth, Werner; Huck, Steffen, and Müller, Wieland. 1998. “The relevance of equal splits – On a behavioral discontinuity in ultimatum games”. Working Paper. Harmon-Jones, Eddie; Harmon-Jones, Cindy. 2007. “Cognitive Dissonance Theory after 50 Years of Development”. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 38(1), 7-16. Harmon-Jones, Eddie; Amodio, David M.; Harmon-Jones, Cindy. 2009. “Action-Based Model of Dissonance: A Review, Integration, and Expansion of Conceptions of Cognitive Conflict”. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Volume 41. 119-165. Harmon-Jones, Eddie. “Cognitive Dissonance Theory”. 2012. Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, Second Edition, Volume 1. 543-549. Kahneman, Daniel; Tversky, Amos. 1981. “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice”. Science, New Series, Vol. 211, No. 4481. 453-458. Kahneman, Daniel; Ritov, Ilana; Schkade, David. 1999. “Economic Preferences or Attitude Expression? An Analysis of Dollar Responses to Public Issues”. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19: 1-3. 203-235. Kirchsteiger, Georg. “The role of envy in ultimatum games”. 1994. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. Vol. 25. 373-389. Konow, James. 2000. “Fair Shares: Accountability and Cognitive Dissonance in Allocation Decisions”. The American Economic Review. September, 1072-1091. Levine, David K. 1997. “Modeling Altruism and Spitefulness in Experiments”. UCLA, Department of Economics Working Paper. Lodge, Milton. 1981. “Magnitude Scaling. Quantitative Measurement of Opinions”. Series: Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Newbury Park, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications. Luce, M.F.; Bettman, J.R., Payne, J.W. 2001. “Emotional decisions: The consequences of disagreement”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88. 22-37. McAuliffe, Katherine; Blake, Peter R.; Warneken, Felix. 2015. Children reject inequity out of spite. Biol. Lett. 10: 20140743. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2014.0743 Miller, Joanne M., Peterson, David A.M. 2004. “Theoretical and Empirical Implications of Attitude Strength”. The Journal of Politics, Vol. 66, No. 3, August. 847-867. Montello, Daniel R. 1991. “The Measurement of cognitive Distance: Methods and Construct Validity”. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11. 101-122. Olson, J. M.; Maio, G. R. 2003. “Attitudes in social behavior”. In T. Millon & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology: Vol. 5. Personality and Social Psychology. 299-325. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Oxoby, Robert J. 2003. “Attitudes and allocations: status, cognitive dissonance, and the manipulation of attitudes”. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, Vol. 52. 365-385. Petty, Richard E., Wegener, Duane T., Fabrigar, Leandre R. 1997. “Attitudes and Attitude Change.” Annu. Rev. Psychol., Vol. 48. 609-647. Petty, Richard. E., Wheeler, S. Christian, Tormala, Zakary T. 2003. “Persuasion and attitude change”. In Weiner, Irving B., Lerner, Melvin, J.; Millon, Theodore (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology: Vol. 5. Personality and Social Psychology. 353-373. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Rabin, Matthew. 1994. “Cognitive Dissonance and Social Change”. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organiszation, 23. 177-194. Rabin, Matthew. 1993. “Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics”. The American Economic Review, Vol. 83, No. 5, 1993. 1281-1302. Reisenzein, Rainer. 2014. „Handlungstendenz“. Dorsch Lexikon der Psychologie. Verlag Hans Huber, Hogrefe AG. https://portal.hogrefe.com/dorsch/handlungstendenz/ 23.07.2014 15:56 Sadava, Stanley; McCreary, Donald. 1997. “Applied Social Psychology”. Toronto: Prentice Hall. Smith, Craig E.; Blake, Peter R.; Harris, Paul L. 2013. “I Should but I Won’t: Why Young Children Endorse Norms of Fair Sharing but Do Not Follow Them”. PLoS ONE 8(3): e59510. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059510 Svenson, Ola. 2006. “Pre- and postdecision construction of preferences: Differentiation and Consolidation”. In: Lichtenstein, Sarah; Slovic, Paul. The Construction of Preference. 356-371. New York: Cambridge University Press. Takemura, K. 1994. “Framing kouka no rironteki setumei: risk ka niokeru ishikettei no jyokyou-izonteki-syouten-model, Shinrigaku Hyoron”. 37(3), 270-291. (Theoretical explanation of framing effect: Contingent focus model of decision framing, Japanese Psychological Review, 37 (3), 270-291. Takemura, Kazuhisa. 2014. “Behavioral Decision Theory. Psychological and Mathematical Descriptions of Human Choice Behavior”. Heidelberg, Tokyo: Springer. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/68480 |