EU enlargement and innovation policy in Central European countries: The case of Hungary

Havas, Attila (2004): EU enlargement and innovation policy in Central European countries: The case of Hungary. Published in: Salavisa, I., W. Rodrigues, S. Mendonça (eds): Inovação e Globalização: Estratégias para o desenvolvimento económico e territorial, Porto: Campo das Letras, 2007 (2007): pp. 83-113.

Abstract

Hungary, just as all the other Central European countries, is facing a number of interrelated challenges: the changing dynamics of globalisation and the concomitant re-arrangement of the international division of labour, as well as joining the European Union, where cohesion with the more developed members is a crucial issue for both the EU and national policy-makers. The starting point of this paper is that innovation – new technological, organisational and managerial solutions – is a must to enhance international competitiveness and thus improve quality of life. Although innovation is mainly matter for companies, public policies should assist the creation, exploitation, and diffusion of knowledge. Science, technology and innovation (STI) policies, therefore, can, and indeed should, play a significant role in meeting the above challenges – together with a host of other policies, such as education, competition, industrial, investment promotion, regional development and trade policies. Recent STI policies pursued in Hungary are assessed from this perspective. Thus, this chapter first puts STI policy issues into context by summarising the major challenges faced by policy-makers. To provide some background information on the policy formation process, albeit not a detailed sociological account, Section 3 describes the roles and responsibilities of the various actors in shaping Hungarian STI policies. Policy schemes are then discussed in Section 4. As policy misconceptions can easily lead to inappropriate spending of public money, some of the widely held mistaken believes are reviewed in Section 5, also serving as a basis for conclusions summarised in the final section.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: STI policies, National innovation system, Accession to the EU, Cohesion, Hungary, Central and Eastern Europe
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B52 - Institutional ; Evolutionary; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I20 - General; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I28 - Government Policy; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O38 - Government Policy; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O52 - Europe

References

Acha, Virginia and Katalin Balázs [1999]: Transitions in thinking: changing the mindsets of policy makers about innovation, Technovation, Vol. 19, No. 6-7, pp. 355-364.

Bucar, Maja and Metka Stare [2002]: Slovenian Innovation Policy: Underexploited Potential for Growth, Journal of International Relations and Development, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 427-448.

Breschi, Stefano and Franco Malerba [1997]: Technological Regimes, Schumpeterian Dynamics, and Spatial Boundaries, in: Edquist, Charles (ed.) [1997], pp. 130-156.

Chataway, Joanna [1999]: Technology transfer and the restructuring of science and technology in central and eastern Europe, Technovation, Vol. 19, No. 6-7, pp. 345-353.

Dodgson, Mark and John Bessant [1996]: Effective Innovation Policy: A new approach, London: International Thomson.

Dodgson, Mark and Roy Rothwell (eds) [1994]: The Handbook of Industrial Innovation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Dosi, Giovanni [1988]: Sources, procedures and microeconomic effects of innovation, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 26, September, pp. 1120-1171.

Dosi, Giovanni, Christopher Freeman, Richard R. Nelson, Gerald Silverberg, and Luc Soete (eds) [1988]: Technical Change and Economic Theory, London: Pinter.

Dosi, Giovanni, Christopher Freeman and Silvia Fabiani [1994]: The process of economic development: Introducing some stylized facts and theories on technologies, firms and institutions, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 1-45.

EC [2000]: Innovation policy in a knowledge-based economy, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, EUR 17023.

EC [2003]: European Innovation Scoreboard 2003, CORDIS focus supplement, Luxembourg: European Commission, Enterprise Directorate-General.

EP [2002]: Working Document on the state of research in applicant countries and measures needed to ensure their full participation in the framework programme, European Parliament, Committee on Industry, External Trade, Research and Energy, 2082/2002(INI), 27 June.

Edquist, Charles (ed.) [1997]: Systems of Innovations: Technologies, institutions and organizations, London: Pinter.

Ergas, Henry [1987]: The importance of technology policy, in: Partha Dasgupta and Paul Stoneman (eds): Economic Policy and Technological Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 51-96.

Freeman, Christopher [1991]: Networks of innovators, a synthesis of research issues, Research Policy, Vol. 20, No. 5, pp.499-514.

Freeman, Christopher [1994]: The economics of technical change: A critical survey, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 463-514.

Freeman, Christopher [1995]: The ‘National System of Innovation’ in historical perspective, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 5-24.

Freeman, Christopher and Luc Soete [1997]: The Economics of Industrial Innovation [3rd edn], London: Pinter.

Havas, Attila [1999]: A Long Way to Go: The Hungarian science and technology policy in transition, in: Mihály Laki, Anne Lorentzen and Brigitte Wiedmaier (eds): Institutional change and industrial development in Central and Eastern Europe, pp. 221-48, Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.

Havas, Attila [2002]: Does Innovation Policy Matter in a Transition Country? The case of Hungary, Journal of International Relations and Development, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 380-402.

Havas, Attila [2003]: Bumpy Road or Fast Lane? - Central European countries, ERA and the Lisbon-Barcelona strategy, paper presented at the Six Countries Programme workshop on Crossing Borders: Venturing into the European Research Area, Kismarton - Ödenburg, 30-31 October 2003.

Havas, Attila and Lajos Nyiri [2004]: The Socio-economic Impacts of Framework Programmes in Transition Countries: A systemic approach of assessment methods, KTK MT-DP 2004/1.

Hirsch-Kreinsen, Hartmut, David Jacobson, Staffan Laestadius and Keith Smith [2003]: Low-Tech Industries and the Knowledge Economy: State of the art and research challenges, paper for the research project “PILOT: Policy and Innovation in Low-Tech”, August 2003.

Kubielas, Stanislaw [2003]: Polish Macroeconomic and S&T Policies: Interlinkages for Growth and Decline, Journal of International Relations and Development, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 156-184.

Lundvall, Bengt-Åke and Susana Borrás [1999]: The Globalising Learning Economy: Implications for Innovation Policy, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

Metcalfe, Stanley J. and Luke Georghiou [1998]: Equilibrium and evolutionary foundations of technology policy, STI Review, No. 22, pp. 75-100.

Malerba, Franco [2002]: Sectoral systems of innovation and production, Research Policy, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 247-264.

Müller, Karel [2002]: Innovation Policy in the Czech Republic: From Laissez Faire to State Activism, Journal of International Relations and Development, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 403-426.

Nauwelaers, Claire and Alasdair Reid [2002]: Learning Innovation Policy in a Market-based Context: Process, Issues and Challenges for EU Candidate-countries, Journal of International Relations & Development, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 357-379.

Nelson, Richard R. (ed.) [1993]: National Innovation Systems: A comparative study, New York: Oxford University Press.

Nelson, Richard R. [1995]: Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 33, January, pp. 48-90.

Nelson, Richard R. and Sidney G. Winter [1982]: An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University.

OECD [1992]: TEP: The Key Relationships, Paris: OECD.

OECD [1997]: Creativity, Innovation and Job Creation, Paris: OECD.

OECD [1998]: New Rationale and Approaches in Technology and Innovation Policy, STI Review, No. 22.

OECD [2000]: Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2000, Paris: OECD.

OECD [2001a]: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard: Towards a knowledge-based economy, 2001 edition, Paris: OECD.

OECD [2001b]: Innovative Networks: Co-operation in national innovation systems, Paris: OECD.

OECD [2002]: Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2002, Paris: OECD.

OECD [2003]: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard, 2003 edition, Paris: OECD-

Reid, Alasdair, Slavo Radosevic and Claire Nauwelaers [2002]: Innovation Policy in Six Applicant Countries: The challenges, Luxembourg: European Commission, Innovation Papers No. 16.

Smith, Keith [1997]: Economic Infrastructures and Innovation Systems, in: Edquist, Charles (ed.) [1997], pp. 86-106-

Smith, Keith [2002]: What is the ‘Knowledge Economy’? Knowledge intensity and distributed knowledge bases, UNU/INTECH Discussion Paper Series, 2002-6.

Srholec, Martin [forthcoming]: Global Production Systems and Technological Catching up: Thinking twice about high-tech industries in the emerging countries, in: Piech, K. and S. Radosevic (eds): The Knowledge-Based Economy in Central and East European Countries: Economies and industries in a process of change, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Tidd, Joe, John Bessant and Keith Pavitt [1997]: Managing Innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.