Grandparents as Guards: A Game-Theoretic Analysis of Inheritance and Post-Marital Residence in a world of Uncertain Paternity

Guha, Brishti (2016): Grandparents as Guards: A Game-Theoretic Analysis of Inheritance and Post-Marital Residence in a world of Uncertain Paternity.

Abstract

I unify the following (1) men face paternity uncertainty while women do not face maternity uncertainty, (2) putative fathers and paternal kin care about true paternity, (3) paternity confidence is systematically lower in matrilocal cultures than in patrilocal ones, (4) inheritance tends to be patrilineal where paternity confidence is high and matrilineal where it is low, and (5) most societies with patrilineal inheritance were patrilocal while most societies with matrilineal inheritance were matrilocal. I explore the following related puzzles: (1) Why were patrilineal-patrilocal societies (PP) more sexually restrictive for women than matrilineal-matrilocal ones (MM)? (2) Why did the older generation in PP and MM societies play starkly different roles in sexual monitoring? (3) Why did most societies emerge as PP while a few became MM? (4) Can the correlation between inheritance and post-marital residence be explained without assuming the exogeneity of either? To answer these questions I look at the simultaneous determination of inheritance, residence, and levels of sexual monitoring/permissiveness.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Uncertain paternity; grandparents; incentives; patrilocality; inheritance; monitoring.
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D02 - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D82 - Asymmetric and Private Information ; Mechanism Design; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J12 - Marriage ; Marital Dissolution ; Family Structure ; Domestic Abuse

References

1. Ahmed, I. and J.F. Timmons (1971) “Current land reforms in East Pakistan” Land Economics 47: 55-64.

2. Alexander, Richard D (1974) “The evolution of social behavior” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 5, 325-383.

3.Anderson, K.G (2006) “How Well Does Paternity Confidence Match Actual Paternity? Evidence from Worldwide Nonpaternity Rates”, Current Anthropology 47, 513-520.

4. Anderson, K.G, H. Kaplan and J.B Lancaster (2007) “Confidence of paternity, divorce and investment in children by Albuquerque men”, Evolution and Human Behavior 28, 1-10.

5. Apicella, C.L and F.W. Marlowe (2004) “Perceived Mate Fidelity and Paternal Resemblance Predict Men’s Investment in Children”, Evolution and Human Behavior 25, 371-378.

6.Arnfred, S (2007) “Sex, food and female power: discussion of data material from Northern Mozambique”, Sexualities 10: 141-160.

7.Bennedsen, M., K. Nielsen, F. Perez-Gonzalez and D. Wolfenzon (2006) “Inside the family firm: the role of families in succession decisions and performance”, ECGI Working Paper Series in Finance, WP no 132/2006.

8.Bertrand, M. and A. Schoar (2006) “The Role of Family in Family Firms”, Journal of Economic Perspectives 20(2): 73-96.

9.Bethmann, D and M. Kvasnicka (2010) “The institution of marriage”, Journal of Population Economics DOI 10.1007/s00148-010-0312-1.

10.Boserup, Ester (1970) Woman’s role in economic development. London, Allen and Unwin.

11.Botticini, M and A. Siow (2003) “Why Dowries?” American Economic Review 93(4) : 1385-1398.

12.Bruce, N and M Waldman (1990) “ The Rotten-Kid Theorem Meets the Samaritan’s Dilemma”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 105(1), 155-165.

13.Burgess, R.L and P. Draper (1989) “The Explanation of Family Violence: The Role of Biological, Behavioral and Cultural Selection”, Crime and Justice 11: 59-116.

14.Buss, David M (2002) “Human Mate Guarding”, Neuroendocrinology Letters, Special Issue 23(Suppl 4) 23-29.

15.Claessens, S., S. Djankov and L.H.P Lang (2000) “The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations”, Journal of Financial Economics 58: 81-112.

16.Cox, D. (2007) “Biological Basics and the Economics of the Family”, Journal of Economic Perspectives 21: 91-108.

17.Cronqvist, H. and M. Nilsson (2003) “Agency costs of controlling minority shareholder”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 38(4): 695-719.

18.Daly, M and M Wilson (1982) “Whom are newborn babies said to resemble?” Ethology and Sociobiology 3, 69-78.

19.Daly, M and M Wilson (1985) “Child abuse and other risks of not living with both parents”, Ethology and Sociobiology 6, 197-210.

20.Daly, M, M Wilson and S Weghorst (1982) “Male sexual jealousy”, Ethology and Sociobiology 3, 11-27.

21.Davies, N.B (1992) : Dunnock behavior and Social Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

22.Diamond, A.M Jr and L. Locay (1989) “Investment in Sister’s Children as Behavior Towards Risk”, Economic Inquiry 27(4): 719-735.

23.Divale, W.T (1974) “Migration, External Warfare, and Matrilocal Residence”, Behavior Science Research 9: 75-133.

24.Doepke, M and M Tertilt (2009) “Women’s Liberation : What’s In It for Men?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 124(4) : 1541-1591.

25.Draper, P (1997) “Institutional, evolutionary and demographic contexts of gender roles: A case study of Kung Bushmen”, in The evolving female: a life-history perspective (M.E Morbeck, A. Galloway and A.L Zihlman eds). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

26.Ember, M and C Ember (1971) “The Conditions Favoring Matrilocal over Patrilocal Residence”, American Anthropologist 73(3) : 571-594.

27.Ember, C and M Ember (1992) “Warfare, Aggression and Resource Problems: Cross-Cultural Codes”, Behavior Science Research 26: 169-226.

28.Ember, M (1974) “The Conditions That May Favor Avunculocal Residence”, Cross-Cultural Research 9(3):203-209.

29.Francesconi, M, C. Ghiglino and M. Perry (2010) “On the Origin of the Family” CEPR Discussion Paper 7629.

30.Fukutake, T (1967) Japanese rural society. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

31.Gasson, R, G. Crow, A. Errington, J. Hutson, T. Marsden and M. Winter (1988) “The Farm as a Family Business: A Review”, Journal of Agricultural Economics 39: 1-41.

32.Gaulin, S.J.C, D.H. McBurney, and S.L Brakeman-Wartell (1997) “Matrilineal biases in the investments of aunts and uncles: a consequence and measure of paternity uncertainty” Human Nature, 8, 139-151.

33.Gaulin, S.J.C and A. Schlegel (1980)“Paternal confidence and paternal investment : a cross-cultural test of a sociobiological hypothesis” Ethology and Sociobiology 1, 301-309.

34.Globerman, J (1996) “Motivations to care: daughters and sons-in-law caring for relatives with Alzheimer’s disease” Family Relations 45(1); 37-45.

35.Goldschmidt, W and E.J. Kunkel (1971) “The Structure of the Peasant Family”, American Anthropologist 73: 1058-1076.

36.Gough, K (1959) “The Nayars and the Definition of Marriage”, The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 89(1) : 23-34.

37.Hamilton, W.D (1964) “The Genetical Evolution of Social Behavior I,II”, Journal of Theoretical Biology 7(1): 1-52.

38.Hartung, J (1985) “Matrilineal inheritance : New Theory and Evidence”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 661-688.

39.Hill, K.R., R.S. Walker, M. Bozicevic, J. Eder, T. Headland, B. Hewlett, A.M. Hurtado, F. Marlowe, P. Wiessner, and B. Wood (2011) “Co-residence Patterns in Hunter-Gatherer Societies Show Unique Human Social Structure”, Science 331(6022) : 1286-1289.

40.Hutson, J (1987) “Fathers and sons: Family Farms, Family Businesses and the farming industry” Sociology 21: 215-229.

41.Juvenal, D (1895) : Junii Juvenalis Saturarum Libri V . Mit Erklarenden Anmerkungen von Ludwig Friedlaender, Erster Band. Leipzig : Verlag von S. Hirzel.

42.Kim, M (1996) “Changing relationships between daughters-in-law and mothers-in-law in urban South Korea”, Anthropological Quarterly 69(4): 179-192.

43.Kivett, V. (1985) “Consanguinity and kin level: their relative importance to the helping network of older adults”, Journal of Gerontology 40(2): 228-234.

44.Korotayev, A. (2003) “Form of marriage, sexual division of labor, and postmarital residence in cross-cultural perspective: a Reconsideration”, Journal of Anthropological Research 59: 69-89.

45.Kurland, J. (1979) “Paternity, mother’s brother, and human sociality” in Evolutionary Biology and Human Social Behavior, N.A Chagnon and W. Irons (eds) : Duxbury Press, MA.

46.Lee, R.B (1979) The !Kung San: Men, Women and Work in a Foraging Society. Cambridge University Press.

47.LeJeune, Paul (1634) “Relation of what occurred in New France in the year 1634” in The Jesuit Relations and Allied Documents, ed Edna Kenton, New York 1925.

48.Leonetti, D.L, D.C Nath, N.S Hemam (2007) “In-law conflict: women’s reproductive lives and the roles of their mothers and husbands among the matrilineal Khasi” Current Anthropology 48(6): 861-874.

49.Merrill, D (2009) “Gender differences in contact with parents and in-laws: do couples see more of her family than his?” Conference Papers, American Sociological Association 2009 Annual Meeting, pp 1-24.

50.Morck, R.K, D.A Stangeland and B. Yeung (2000) “Inherited wealth, corporate control and economic growth?” in Concentrated corporate ownership (R. Morck, ed) NBER Conference Volume. Chicago.

51.Murdock, G.P (1957) “World ethnographic sample”, American Anthropologist 59(4): 664-687.

52.Murdock, G.P (1967) “Ethnographic Atlas: A Summary”, Ethnology 6: 109-236.

53.Murphy, R.F (1956)“Matrilocality and Patrilineality in Mundurucu Society”,American Anthropologist 58(3):414-434.

54.Otterbein, K.F (1968) “Internal War: A Cross-Cultural Study”, American Anthropologist 70: 277-289.

55.Perez-Gonzalez, F. (2006) “Inherited control and firm performance”, American Economic Review 96(5): 1559-1588.

56.Poewe, K.O (1981) Matrilineal Ideology: Male-Female Dynamics in Luapula, Zambia. London and New York: Academic Press.

57.Ross, M.H (1985) “Internal and External Conflict and Violence: Cross-Cultural Evidence and a New Analysis”, Journal of Conflict Resolution 29: 547-579.

58.Saint-Paul, G (2008) “Genes, Legitimacy and Hypergamy: Another Look at the Economics of Marriage”, CEPR Discussion Paper 6828.

59.Schulze, W.L, M.H Lubatkin, R.N Dino and A.K Buchholtz (2001) “Agency Relationships in Family Firms: Theory and Evidence” Organization Science 12(2) : 99-116.

60.Schwarz, U. (2004) : To Farm or Not to Farm: Gendered Paths to Succession and Inheritance. LIT Verlag Munster, Munster.

61.Sear, R, R Mace and I McGregor (2000) “Maternal Grandmothers Improve Nutritional Status and Survival of Children in Rural Gambia”, Proceedings of the Royal Society B : Biological Sciences 267, 1641-1647.

62.Shackelford, T.K, D.M Buss and K. Bennett (2002) : “Forgiveness or Breakup : Sex Differences in Response to a Partner’s Infidelity”, Cognition and Emotion 16(2) : 299-307.

63.Sheldon, B.C and H. Ellegren (1998) “Paternal Effort Related to Experimentally Manipulated Paternity of Male Collared Flycatchers”, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 265: 1737-1742.

64.Shuey,K. and M.A Hardy (2003) “Assistance to aging parents and parents-in-law: does lineage affect family allocation decisions?” Journal of Marriage and Family 65(2): 418-431.

65.Siow, A. (1998) “Differential Fecundity, Markets and Gender Roles” Journal of Political Economy 106: 334-354.

66.Sweetser, D.A (1984) “Love and work: intergenerational household composition in the U.S in 1900”, Journal of Marriage and Family 4(2) : 289-293.

67.Villalonga, B and R. Amit (2006) “How do family ownership, management and control affect firm value?” Journal of Financial Economics 80(2) : 385-417.

68.Voland, E and J Beise (2002) “Opposite Effects of Maternal and Paternal Grandmothers on Infant Survival in Historical Krummhorn”, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 52, 435-443.

69.Voland, E and J Beise (2005) “The husband’s mother is the Devil in the House” in Grandmotherhood: the Evolutionary Significance of the Second Half of Female Life (E. Voland, A. Chasiotis and W. Schiefenhoevel eds), 239-255. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

70.Wilson, M and M Daly (1987) “Risk of maltreatment of children living with stepparents” in Gelles, R.J and J.B Lancaster (eds) : Child abuse and neglect : biosocial dimensions, 215-232, Aldine de Gruyter, Hawthorne, New York.