The sociological perspective on the knowledge-based society: assumptions, facts and visions

Krings, Bettina (2006): The sociological perspective on the knowledge-based society: assumptions, facts and visions. Published in: Enterprise and Work Innovation Studies No. 2 (November 2006): pp. 9-20.

Abstract

The paper will present the central discourse of the knowledge-based society. Already in the 1960s the debate of the industrial society already raised the question whether there can be considered a paradigm shift towards a knowledge-based society. Some prominent authors already foreseen ‘knowledge’ as the main indicator in order to displace ‘labour’ and ‘capital’ as the main driving forces of the capitalistic development. Today on the political level and also in many scientific disciplines the assumption that we are already living in a knowledge-based society seems obvious. Although we still do not have a theory of the knowledge-based society and there still exist a methodological gap about the empirical indicators, the vision of a knowledge-based society determines at least the perception of the Western societies. In a first step the author will pinpoint the assumptions about the knowledge-based society on three levels: on the societal, on the organisational and on the individual level. These assumptions are relied on the following topics: a) The role of the information and communication technologies; b) The dynamic development of globalisation as an ‘evolutionary’ process; c) The increasing importance of knowledge management within organisations; d) The changing role of the state within the economic processes. Not only the differentiation between the levels but also the revision of the assumptions of a knowledge-based society will show that the ‘topics raised in the debates’ cannot be considered as the results of a profound societal paradigm shift. However what seems very impressive is the normative and virtual shift towards a concept of modernity, which strongly focuses on the role of technology as a driving force as well as on the global economic markets, which has to be accepted. Therefore – according to the official debate - the successful adaptation of these processes seems the only way to meet the knowledge-based society. Analysing the societal changes on the three levels, the label ‘knowledge-based society’ can be seen critically. Therefore the main question of Theodor W. Adorno during the 16th Congress of Sociology in 1968 did not loose its actuality. Facing the societal changes he asked whether we are still living in the industrial society or already in a post-industrial state. Thinking about the knowledge-based society according to these two options, this exercise would enrich the whole debate in terms of social inequality, political, economic exclusion processes and at least the power relationship between social groups.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: industrial society; knowledge-based society; technology; organisations; knowledge management
• Subjects: J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J8 - Labor Standards: National and International > J80 - General; F - International Economics > F2 - International Factor Movements and International Business > F20 - General; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes; A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A14 - Sociology of Economics

References

Altieri, G., Oteri, C. Pedaci, M., Dahl-Jorgensen, C., Satermo, T. Torvatn, H. (2006): Changes in Quality of Life, in: Huws, U. (ed.): The Transformation of Work in a Global Economy: towards a conceptual framework. Leuven, 145-160 Bell, D. (1962): The End of Ideology: On the Exhaustion of Political Ideas in the Fifties. Revised edition, New York Bell, D. (1973): The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. A Venture in Social Forecasting. New York Bittlingmeyer, U. H. (2005): Wissensgesellschaft als Wille und Vorstellung. Konstanz Bittlingmeyer, U. H., Bauer, U. (eds.) (2006): Die Wissensgesellschaft. Mythos, Ideologie oder Realität? Konstanz Boes, A; Trinks, K. (2005): Interessen und Interessenhandeln von IT-Beschäftigten in der Genderperspektive. In: Funder, M.; Dörhöfer, S.; Rauch, Ch. (eds.): Jenseits der Geschlechterdifferenz? Geschlechterverhältnisse in der Informations- und Wissensgesellschaft. München, 284-304 Boß, C., Roth, V. (1992): Die Zukunft der DV-Berufe. Opladen Castells, M. (1996): The Rise of the Network Society. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Vol. I., Oxford Deutscher Bundestag (2002): Schlussbericht der Enquete-Kommission Globalisierung der Weltwirtschaft – Herausforderungen und Antworten, Drucksache 14/9200. Berlin European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (2001): Employment trough flexibility: squaring the circle. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg Flecker, J., Papouschek, U., Gavroglou, S. (2006): New Forms of Work Organisation and Flexibility in the Knowledge-based society, in: Huws, U. (ed.): The Transformation of Work in a Global Economy: towards a conceptual framework. Leuven, 45-60 Freemann, Ch., Soete, L., Efendioglu, U. (1995): Diffusion and the Employment. Effects of Information and Communication Technology, International Labour Review, Vol. 134, No. 4-5 (1995), 587-603 Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzmann, S., Scott, P., Trow, M. (1994): The New Production of Knowledge. The dynamics of science and research in contemporary sciences. London. Held, D., Mc Grew, Goldblatt, D., Perraton, J. (1999): Global Transformation. Cambridge Huws, U. (2003): When works takes flight: final report of the EMERGENCE project. IES, Brighton Kübler, H.-D. (2005): Mythos Wissensgesellschaft. Gesellschaftlicher Wandel zwischen Information, Medien und Wissen. Eine Einführung. Wiesbaden Maasen, S. (1999): Wissenssoziologie. Bielefeld Mattelart, A. (2003): Kleine Geschichte der Informationsgesellschaft. Berlin Porat, M. U. (1976): The Information Economy. Stanford Polányi, M. (1958): Personal knowledge: towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago Pongraß, H. J., Voß, G. G. (2003): From employee to entreployee: towards a self-entrepreneurial work force?, Concepts and Transformation, Vol 8, No 3, 239-254 Nonaka, I. (1994): A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science 5, 1994, 95-103 Reich, R. (1991): The Work of Nations. Preparing Ourselves for 21st-Century Capitalism. New York Renzl, B. (2004): Zentrale Aspekte des Wissensbegriffs – Kernelemente der Organisation von Wissen. In: Wyssusek a.a.O., p 27-42 Stehr, N. (1994a): Arbeit, Eigentum und Wissen. Zur Theorie von Wissensgesellschaften. Frankfurt, M. Stehr, N. (1994b): Knowledge Societies. London UNCTAD/ World Bank (1994): Liberalizing International Transactions in Services: A Handbook. New York, Genf Webster, F. (1995, 1.edition): Theories of the Information Society. London Willke, H. (1998): Organisierte Wissensarbeit, Zeitschrift für Soziologie 27, H 3, 161-177 Willke, H. (2001): Systemisches Wissensmanagement. Stuttgart Wyssusek, B. (ed.) (2004): Wissensmanagement komplex. Perspektiven und soziale Praxis. Berlin Voß, G. G. (1998): Die Entgrenzung von Arbeit und Arbeitskraft. Eine subjektorientierte Interpretation des Wandels der Arbeit. In: Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, Jg. 31, Nr. 3, 473-487