Aytug, Huseyin (2016): Does the Reserve Options Mechanism really decrease exchange rate volatility? The Synthetic Control Method Approach.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_71400.pdf Download (863kB) | Preview |
Abstract
After the invention of the Reserve Option Mechanism (ROM) by the Central Bank of Turkey, it has been debated whether it can help decrease the volatility of foreign exchange rate. In this study, I apply a new micro-econometric technique, the synthetic control method, in order to construct a counterfactual foreign exchange rate volatility in the absence of the ROM. I find that, USD/TRY rate is less volatile under the ROM. However, the ROM has not worked efficiently after the announcement of FED's tapering in May 2013. Furthermore, the ROM could have decreased the volatility of foreign exchange rate if FED had not started tapering.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Does the Reserve Options Mechanism really decrease exchange rate volatility? The Synthetic Control Method Approach |
English Title: | Does the Reserve Options Mechanism really decrease exchange rate volatility? The Synthetic Control Method Approach |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | FX Intervention, Synthetic Control Method, Required Reserves |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C31 - Cross-Sectional Models ; Spatial Models ; Treatment Effect Models ; Quantile Regressions ; Social Interaction Models E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E58 - Central Banks and Their Policies F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F31 - Foreign Exchange |
Item ID: | 71400 |
Depositing User: | Huseyin Aytug |
Date Deposited: | 19 May 2016 18:54 |
Last Modified: | 07 Oct 2019 07:03 |
References: | Alberto Abadie, Alexis Diamond, and Jens Hainmueller. Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: Estimating the effect of California's tobacco control program. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105(490), 2010. Alberto Abadie and Javier Gardeazabal. The economic costs of conflict: A case study of the basque country. American Economic Review,113-132, 2003. Koray Alper, Hakan Kara, and Mehmet Yorukogluu. Reserve Options Mechanism. Central Bank Review, 13(1), 2012. Oguz Aslaner, Ugur Ciplak, Hakan Kara, and Doruk Kucuksarac. Reserve Options Mechanism: Does it work as an automatic stabilizer? Central Bank Review, 15(1), 2015. Andreas Billmeier and Tommaso Nannicini. Assessing economic liberalization episodes: A synthetic control approach. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(3):983{1001, 2013. N Campos, Fabrizio Coricelli, and Luigi Moretti. Economic growth and political integration: Synthetic counterfactuals evidence from Europe. Technical report, mimeo, 2014. Marcos Chamon, Marcio Garcia, and Laura Souza. Fx interventions in Brazil: A synthetic control approach. Technical report, 2015. Ahmet Degerli and Salih Fendoglu. Reserve option mechanism as a stabilizing policy tool: Evidence from exchange rate expectations. International Review of Economics & Finance, 35:166{179, 2015. Pedro Gomis-Porqueras and Laura Puzzello. Winners and losers from the euro. Doruk Kucuksarac and Ozgur Ozel. Reserve options mechanism and computation of reserve options coefficients. TCMB Ekonomi Notu, (12/33), 2012. Wang-Sheng Lee. Comparative case studies of the effects of infation targeting in emerging economies. Oxford Economic Papers, 2010. Arif Oduncu, Yasin Akcelik, and Ergun Ermisoglu. Reserve options mechanism and Fx volatility. Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey Working Paper, (13/03), 2013. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/71400 |