Li, Hui (2010): Downturn LGD: A Spot Recovery Approach.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_71986.pdf Download (462kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Basel II suggests that banks estimate downturn loss given default (DLGD) to capture the systemic correlation between default rate and loss given default through economic cycles. However, previous approaches in the literature may not be internally consistent and may have bias in capital calculation. In this paper, we propose a new consistent model framework based on our recent work on stochastic spot recovery. We also compare numerically the downturn LGD in our model with some of the previous approaches.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Downturn LGD: A Spot Recovery Approach |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Basel II, Downturn Loss Given Default, Stochastic Recovery, Spot Recovery, Factor Credit Models, Default Time Copula, Gaussian Copula, Large Homogeneous Pool, Credit VaR, Expected Shortfall |
Subjects: | G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance > G32 - Financing Policy ; Financial Risk and Risk Management ; Capital and Ownership Structure ; Value of Firms ; Goodwill G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G13 - Contingent Pricing ; Futures Pricing |
Item ID: | 71986 |
Depositing User: | Hui Li |
Date Deposited: | 16 Jun 2016 07:58 |
Last Modified: | 01 Oct 2019 16:22 |
References: | [1] E. Altman (2006): Default Recovery Rates and LGD in the Credit Risk Model and Practice: An Updated Review of the Literature and Empirical Evidence. defaultrisk.com. [2] L. Andersen and J. Sidenius (2004): Extension to the Gaussian Copula: Random Recovery and Random Factor Loading. Journal of Credit Risk 1(1), pp. 29-70. [3] M. Barco (2007): Going Downturn. Risk 20(8), pp. 70-75. [4] Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2004): Background Note on LGD Quantification. Bank of International Settlements, Basel, December. [5] Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2005): Guidance on Paragraph 468 of the Framework Document. Bank of International Settlements, Basel, July. [6] N. Bennani and J. Maetz (2009): A Spot Recovery Rate Extension of the Gaussian Copula. defaultrisk.com. [7] A.Chabaane, J-P. Laurent and J. Salomon (2004): Double Impact: Credit Risk Assessment and Collateral Value. Revue Finance, 25, pp. 157-178. [8] K. Düllmann and M. Trapp (2004): Systemic risk in recovery rates – an empirical analysis of US corporate credit exposures. Deutsche Bundesbank discussion paper 2. [9] J. Frye (2000): Collateral Damage. Risk 13(4), pp. 91-94. [10] G. Giese (2005): The Impact of PD/LGD correlation on Credit Risk Capital. Risk, 18(4), pp. 78-84. [11] A. Hamerle, M. Knapp and N. Wildenauer (2007): Default and recovery correlations – a dynamic econometric approach. Risk 20(1), pp. 100-105. [12] M. Hillebrand (2006): Modeling and Estimating Dependent Loss Given Default. Risk 19(9), pp. 120-125. [13] D. X. Li (2000): On Default Correlation: A Copula Function Approach. Journal of Fixed Income 9(4), pp. 43-54. [14] H. Li (2009): On Models of Stochastic Recovery for Base Correlation. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/17894/ [15] H. Li (2011): Extension of Spot Recovery Model for Gaussian Copula. International Review of Applied Financial Issues and Economics, 3(3), pp. 606-619. [16] H. Li (2013): A Note on the Double Impact on CVA for CDS: Wrong-Way Risk with Stochastic Recovery. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 16(3), 1350013 [17] P. Miu and B. Ozdemir (2006): Basel Requirement of Downturn LGD: Modeling and Estimating PD and LGD Correlations. Journal of Credit Risk, 2(2), pp. 43-68. [18] M. Pykhtin (2003): Unexpected Recovery Risk. Risk 16(8), pp. 74-78. [19] D. Rösch and H. Scheule (2005): A Multi-Factor Approach for Systemic Default and Recovery Risk. Journal of Fixed Income, 15(2), pp. 63-75. [20] D. Tasche (2004): The single risk factor approach to capital charges in case of correlated loss given default rates. Working Paper, Deutsche Bundesbank. [21] G. Van Damme (2011): A Generic Framework for Stochastic Loss-Given-Default. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 235(8), pp. 2523-2550. [22] O. Vasicek (2002): Loan Portfolio Value. Risk 15(12), pp. 160-162. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/71986 |