Source of Inequality in consumption Expenditure in India: A Regression Based Inequality Decomposition Analysis

Tripathi, Sabyasachi (2016): Source of Inequality in consumption Expenditure in India: A Regression Based Inequality Decomposition Analysis.

Abstract

Higher economic growth in India has bypassed a major percentage of population, whose share in income and benefits has been low. In recent years, the Central Government has been laying more emphasis on redistributive policies (such as, ‘inclusive growth’ strategy) in addition to keeping high the growth momentum. However, along with higher economic growth India has also been experiencing the higher level of inequality over the years. Due to lack of officially provided income data, a considerable number of studies have used consumption data to measure the level of inequality in India. However, much less is known about the driving force behind the trend of the increasing inequality and their quantitative contribution. In this back drop, the present paper estimates the Regression based inequality decomposition (Morduch and Sicular, 2002; Fields, 2003; Fiorio and Jenkins,2007) by considering unit level National Sample Survey data on consumption expenditure for the years 2004-05 and 2011-12 for rural and urban India separately. The main objective behind this exercise is to investigate the relevant household level characteristics which stand as the major source of consumption inequality in India. Regression results show that the estimated regression coefficients match with the expected signs, and most of them are statistically significant at 1 percent level. The decomposition based regression analysis finds that household size is responsible for the maximum share of inequality in the total inequality of the average MPCE and predicted MPCE in the both urban and rural areas in 2004-05 and 2011-12. In addition, factors like higher level of education, share of workers engaged in less productive jobs (such as, casual labour and agricultural worker), regular salary earning member of a household, higher level of land possessed by the households, and households having hired dwelling unit are also contributing to the higher level of inequality in the total inequality of the average MPCE and predicted MPCE. Finally, the paper suggests that in order to avoid the negative consequences of rising inequality in India, government must ensure higher level of education, higher level of employment opportunities, equal land distribution, and housing for all for any meaningful reduction of the level of inequality and for an equal and brighter India tomorrow.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Consumption Expenditure, Inequality, Regression Based Inequality, India
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C21 - Cross-Sectional Models ; Spatial Models ; Treatment Effect Models ; Quantile Regressions; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R10 - General

References

Adams, R.H. (2002). ‘Nonfarm Income, Inequality, and Land in Rural Egypt’, Economic Development and Cultural Change 50:339-63.

Araar, A. and A.T. Timothy (2006). ‘Poverty and Inequality Nexus: Illustration with Nigerian Data’, Working Paper, 06-38, Centre interuniversitaire sur le risque, les politiques économiques et l’emploi (CIRPEE), Université du Québec à Montréal, Available at http://www.cirpee.org/fi leadmin/ documents/Cahiers_2006/CIRPEE06-38.pdf, Accessed on 10 October 2011.

Azam, M., and Bhatt, V. (2016). ‘Spatial Income Inequality in India, 1993-2011: A District Level Decomposition’, IZA DP No. 9892. Available at: http://ftp.iza.org/dp9892.pdf.

Bhanumurthy, N.R. and A. Mitra (2004). ‘Declining Poverty in India: A Decomposition Analysis’, Indian Journal of Labour Economics 47(2): 311-21.

Bigotta, M., J. Krishnakumar , and U. Rani (2015). ‘Further results on the regression -based approach to inequality decomposition with evidence from India’, Empirical Economics 48: 1233-1266.

Blinder, A.S. (1973). ‘Wage Discrimination: Reduced Form and Structural Estimates’, Journal of Human Resources 8: 436-55.

Bourguignon, F., M. Fournier, and M. Gurgand (2001). ‘Fast Development with a stable Income Distribution: Taiwan, 1979-1994’, Review of Income and Wealth 47: 139-63.

Cain, J. S., R. Hasan, R. Magsombol, and A. Tandon (2010). ‘Accounting for Inequality in India: Evidence from Household Expenditures’, World Development 38: 282-297.

Cowell, F.A. and Fiorio, C.V. (2006), ‘Rethinking Inequality Decomposition: Comment’ Distributional Analysis Research Programme Working Paper 82, STICERD, London School of Economics, London, http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/darp/DARP82.pdf.

Deaton, A. and J. Dreze (2002). ‘Poverty and Inequality in India: A Re-Examination’, Economic and Political Weekly 37(36): 3729-48.

Deaton, A. and V. Kozel (2005). ‘Data and Dogma: The Great Indian Poverty Debate’, World Bank Research Observer 20 (2): 177-200.

Fields, G. (2003). ‘Accounting for Income Inequality and Its Change: A New Method, with Application to the Distribution of Earnings in the United States’, in Solomon W. Polachek (ed.) Worker Well-Being and Public Policy (Research in Labor Economics, Volume 22) Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp.1 – 38.

Fields, G.S., and G. Yoo (2000). ‘Falling Labour Income Inequality in Korea’s Economic Growth: Patterns and Underlying Causes’, Review of Income and Wealth 46:139-59.

Fiorio, C. V., and Jenkins, S. P. (2007), ‘ineqrbd: Regression-based inequality decomposition, following Fields (2003), Motivation Model ineqrbd Example: wage inequality’ UKSUG, http://www.stata.com/meeting/13uk/fiorio_ineqrbd_UKSUG07.pdf.

Fields, G. S. (2003). ‘Accounting for income inequality and its change: a new method, with application to the distribution of earnings in the United States’, Research in Labor Economics 22:1-38.

Global Wealth Report (2015), Credit Suisse, Available at: https://publications.credit-suisse.com/tasks/render/file/?fileID=F2425415-DCA7-80B8-EAD989AF9341D47E.

Heltberg, R. (2003). ‘Inequality in Vietnam: A Regression-based Decomposition’, paper presented at the UNU-WIDER Conference on Inequality, Poverty and Human Well- Being, 30-31 May in Helsinki.

Hirschman, A. O., and M. Rothschild (1973). ‘The Changing Tolerance for Income Inequality in the Course of Economic Development’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 87(4): 544-566.

Institute for Human Development (IHD) (2014): ‘India Labour and Employment Report 2014: Workers in the Era of Globalization’, Academic Foundation & Institute for Human Development, New Delhi. Available from http://www.ihdindia.org/ILER.html, accessed on 3rd March, 2015.

Jha, R. (2002). ‘Reducing Poverty and Inequality in India: Has Liberalization Helped?’, Working Papers 2002-04, Arndt-Corden Department of Economics, Australian National University. Canberra, Australia. Available at: https://crawford.anu.edu.au/acde/publications/publish/ papers/wp2002/wp-econ-2002-04.pdf, Accessed on 19 July 2011.

Juhn, C., K. Murphy and B. Pierce (1993). ‘Wage Inequality and the Rise in Returns to Skill’ Journal of Political Economy 101: 410-442.

Kakwani, N. (2000). ‘On Measuring Growth and Inequality Components of Poverty with Application to Thailand’, Journal of Quantitative Economics 16 (1): 67-79.

Kundu, A. (2006). ‘Trends and Patterns of Urbanization and their Economic Implications’, India Infrastructure Report 2006, Oxford University Press, New Delhi, Chapter 2, pp. 27-41.

Kuznets, S. (1955). ‘Economic growth and income inequality’. American Economic Review 65:1-28.

Lerman, R. I., and S. Yitzhaki (1985).‘Income Inequality Effects by Income Source: A New Approach and Applications to the United States’, Review of Economics and Statistics 67:151-156.

Mazumdar, D. and H.H. Son (2002). ‘Vulnerable Groups and the Labour Market in Thailand: Impact of the Asian Financial Crisis in the Light of Thailand’s Growth Process’, Paper presented at the Conference on ‘Social and Economic Impacts of Liberalization and Globalization: Effects on Labour Markets and Income Distribution’, at University of Toronto, 19-20 April, Also available at: http://www.utoronto.ca/plac/pdf/Conf_6_Berry/Mazumdar.pdf, Accessed on 10 April 2012.

Maharana, B., and L. Ladusing (2014). ‘Gender Disparity in Health and Food Expenditure in India among Elderly’, International Journal of Population Research, Article ID 150105 doi:10.1155/2014/150105.

Morduch, J., T. Sicular (2002). ‘Rethinking Inequality Decomposition with Evidence from Rural China’, Economic Journal 112: 93-106.

Oaxaca, R. (1973). ‘Male-Female Wage Differences in Urban Labour Markets’, International Economic Review l 14: 693-709.

Pal, R. (2013). ‘Decomposition of income-related inequality in educational performance: evidence from India’, Journal of Quantitative Economics 11: 180-198.

Pal, P., and J. Ghosh, J. (2007). ‘Inequality in India: A survey of recent trends’, DESA Working Paper No. 45. Available at http://www.un.org/esa/desa/papers/2007/wp45_2007.pdf Pandey, A. (2013). ‘Inequality in consumption expenditure at household level in Uttar Pradesh: Regression Based Inequality Decomposition (RBID)’, Journal of Global Economy 9: 135-152.

Rajan, R. G. (2010). Fault Lines: How Hidden Fractures Still Threaten the World Economy, Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.

Ravallion, M. (2014), ‘Income Inequality in the Developing World’, Science, 344: 851-55. Ray, D. (2010). ‘Uneven Growth: A Framework for Research in Development Economics’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 24: 45-60.

Sarkar, S., and B. S. Mehta (2010). ‘Income Inequality in India: Pre- and Post-Reform Periods’, Economic and Political Weekly 45:45-55.

Shorrocks, A.F. (1982). ‘Inequality Decomposition by Factor Components’, Econometrica, 65: 177-207.

Sen, A. and Himanshu (2004). ‘Poverty and Inequality in India—I’, Economic and Political Weekly 39: 4247-63.

Sundaram, K. and S.D. Tendulkar (2003). ‘Poverty in India in the 1990s: An Analysis of Changes in 15 Major States’, Economic and Political Weekly 38: 1385-93.

Tripathi, S. (2013). ‘Does Higher Economic Growth Reduce Poverty and Increase Inequality? Evidence from Urban India’, Indian Journal of Human Development 7: 109-137.

Wan, G.H. (2002). ‘Regression-Based Inequality Decomposition: Pitfalls and a Solution Procedure’ UNU-WIDER Discussion Paper No. 2002/101, Helsinki.

Wan, G., and Z. Zhou (2005). ‘Income Inequality in Rural China: Regression-based Decomposition Using Household Data’, Review of Development Economics 9: 107-120.

Wan, G. (2004). ‘Accounting for Income Inequality in Rural China: A Regression-based Approach’, Journal of Comparative Economics 32:348-63.

Shorrocks and Wan (2004). ‘A Method for Generating Income Data from Lorenz Coordinates’, unpublished manuscript, UNU-WIDER: Helsinki.

Zhang, X., and K. Zhang (2003). ‘How does Globalization Affect Regional Inequality within a Developing Country? Evidence from China’, Journal of Development Studies 39:47-67.

Web Articles http://164.100.47.192/Loksabha/Questions/QResult15.aspx?qref=9773&lsno=16

http://mintonsunday.livemint.com/news/why-worry-about-inequality-in-india/2.4.2221473700.html

http://www.yourarticlelibrary.com/economics/what-are-the-important-causes-of-income-inequalities-in-india/3041/

http://www.business-standard.com/article/opinion/pranab-bardhan-how-unequal-a-country-is-india-109090500021_1.html

http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2015-04-29/news/61652726_1_housing-shortage-rental-housing-lig

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/jobs/women-in-india-earn-nearly-19-less-than-men-report/articleshow/52416808.cmsutm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst