Impact of public-private-partnership programs on students’ learning outcomes: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment

Hafeez, Fatima and Haider, Adnan and Zafar, Naeem uz (2015): Impact of public-private-partnership programs on students’ learning outcomes: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment. Forthcoming in: Pakistan Development Review , Vol. 4, (2016)

Abstract

Learning outcomes refer to the performance of the students in academic tests pertaining to the respective grade level. In Pakistan, survey evidences from Annual Status of Education Report (ASER) show a significant dispersion in learning outcomes of public schools as compared with private sector counterpart. The perceived results of learning outcomes in private schools very clear but less evidence is found for educational outcome of schools run under public-private partnership programs. This becomes especially relevant when status of curricular, co-curricular, and extra-curricular activities is compared between public school, private schools, and schools run under public private partnership. In recent literature, it is found that schools taken up by public-private partnership have been providing a better learning environment - Infrastructure Rehabilitation and Development, Administrative changes, Academic Innovation and Planning, Teacher Reform and Student Affairs - is perceived to have a positive impact on learning outcomes. It is to investigate and document that the investments in these areas are justifiable. To promote this fact, we conduct a quasi-experiment to examine the profiles of students in a public-private partnership school at Karachi (running under Zindagi Trust program) and a public school (as counterfactual) in the same neighbourhood. We also recorded the household and socioeconomic characteristics to create a good set of control variables. The propensity-score results show that public-private school is performing better than that of comparison group in attaining learning outcomes thus showing positive effects of PPP. Finally, the study probed into household and parental covariates of student's educational outcomes to enhance internal validity of results.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: educational learning outcomes; public-private partnership; quasi-experiment
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C21 - Cross-Sectional Models ; Spatial Models ; Treatment Effect Models ; Quantile Regressions; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I21 - Analysis of Education; L - Industrial Organization > L3 - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise > L32 - Public Enterprises ; Public-Private Enterprises

References

Akhtar, Zarina. (2011). A comparative study of student s learning style, socio-economic status and learning achievement of developed and under developed districts of Pakistan. Language in India. Vol. 11. June 2011.

Amjad, R., and G. MacLeod (2012). Effectiveness of Private, Public and Private-Public Partnership Schools in Pakistan. Memo, Idara-e-Taleem-o-Aagahi, Lahore, Pakistan.

Amjad, R. (2012). Exploring aspects of Private-Public Partnership (PPP) schooling in Pakistan. Policy Brief Note, ASER, Pakistan.

Andrabi, T., Das, J., & Khwaja, A. (2002). The rise of private schooling in Pakistan: Catering to the urban elite or educating the rural poor?. World Bank and Harvard University.

Andrabi, T., Das, J., & Khwaja. A. (2008). A Dime a Day; The Possibilities and Limits of Private Schooling in Pakistan. DECRG World Bank, Comparative Education Review, vol. 52, no. 3, August 2008.

Andrabi, T., Das, J., Khwaja. A., Vishwanath, T., & Zajonc, T. (2007). Learning and Educational Achievements in Punjab Schools: Insights to Inform the Education Policy Debate. Washington DC: The World Bank.

Andrabi, T., Khan, S., Khan, Y., and Naseer, M. F., (2012). Learning in Public Schools. Memo, International Growth Center (IGC), Pakistan Chapter.

Andersen, S. C. (2008). Private schools and the parents that choose them: Empirical evidence from the Danish school voucher system. Scandinavian Political Studies, 31(1), 44-68.

Angrist, J., Bettinger, E., & Kremer, M. (2006). Long-term educational consequences of secondary school vouchers: Evidence from administrative records in Colombia. The American Economic Review, 847-862.

Angrist, J., Bettinger, E., Bloom, E., King, E., & Kremer, M. (2002). Vouchers for private schooling in Colombia: Evidence from a randomized natural experiment (No. w8343). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Arif, G. M., & us Saqib, N. (2003). Production of cognitive and life skills in public, private, and NGO schools in Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review, 1-28.

ASER (2014). Annual Status of Education Report (Pakistan), version 2014, South Asian Forum for Education development (SAFED), Pakistan Office.

Atta, M. A., Jamil, A., Baloch, J.-u.-R., & Ayaz, M. (2011). Effects of the Birth order on Educational Achievements of Children. International Journal of Academic Research, 3(2), 977-982.

Balyer, A., & Gunduz, Y. (2012). Effects of Structured Extracurricular Facilities on Students' Academic and Social Development. YDU Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi/NEU Journal Of Social Sciences, 5(2), 4-20.

Bari, F., Malik, R., Muzaffar, I., Mashhood, T., Mansoor, M., and Ali, A., (2015). Partnerships for Management in Education: Evidence from Punjab and Sindh. Report, August, 2015, Institute of Development and Economic Alternatives (IDEAS), Lahore, Pakistan.

Barrera-Osorio, Felipe, 2007. The impact of private provision of public education : empirical evidence from Bogota's concession schools, Policy Research Working Paper Series 4121, The World Bank.

Barrera-Osorio, F., Bertrand, M., Linden, L. L., & Perez-Calle, F. (2008).Conditional cash transfers in education design features, peer and sibling effects evidence from a randomized experiment in Colombia (No. w13890). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Barrera-Osorio, F., and H. A. Patrinos. 2009. An International Perspective on School Vouchers, in Handbook of Research on School Choice, Peabody College at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.

Barrera-Osorio, F., Patrinos, H. A., & Wodon, Q. (2009). Public-private partnerships in education: An overview. In Emerging Evidence on Vouchers and Faith-Based Providers in Education: Case Studies from Africa, Latin America, and Asia.

Chaudhury, N., Hammer, J., Kremer, M., Muralidharan, K., & Rogers, F. H. (2006). Missing in action: teacher and health worker absence in developing countries. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 91-116.

Cid, A. (2008). Educational Gap and Family Structure in Uruguay. Revista de Ciencias Empresariales y Economia (7), 139-162.

CILasun, S. M. (2013). An Analysis of Academic Performance: Could Family Income and Medium of Instruction Be Determinants? Akademik Performansın Bir Analizi: Aile Geliri ve Eğitim Dili Belirleyici Olabilir mi, 9(1), 9-23.

Chudgar, A., and Quin, E. (2012). Relationship between private schooling and achievement: Results from rural and urban India. Economics of Education Review, 31(4), 376-390.

DaĞLi, Ü. Y., & Jones, I. (2012). The Effects of On-time, Delayed and Early Kindergarten Enrollment on Children's Mathematics Achievement: Differences by Gender, Race, and Family Socio-economic Status. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 12, 3061-3074

Dahl, G. B., & Lochner, L. (2012). The Impact of Family Income on Child Achievement: Evidence from the Earned Income Tax Credit. American Economic Review, 102(5), 1927-1956.

Duflo, E. (2001). Schooling and Labor Market Consequences of School Construction in Indonesia: Evidence from an Unusual Policy Experiment. The American Economic Review, (4). 795.

Geelan, D., Louden, W., & Wildy, H. (2013). Cohort size, sex and socio-economic status as predictors of success in Year 12 Physics in Perth, 1987-1997. Teaching Science: The Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association, 59(4), 22-26.

Irena D., Samo, S., Branka, F., (2014). Analysis of the Implementation of Practical Work in the Area of Early Science Education of Primary School Pupils in the Republic of Slovenia, The New Educational Review, Vol. 35, No. 2, 253 – 265.

Jesson, R., McNaughton, S., & Kolose, T. (2014). Investigating the summer learning effect in low SES schools. Australian Journal of Language & Literacy, 37(1), 45-54.

Kahyaogullari, B. (2013). Public-private partnerships in developing and developed countries: the UK and Turkish cases, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi, IIBF Dergisi, C. XV, S. II, 2013.

Krueger, A. B., & Zhu, P. (2004). Another look at the New York City school voucher experiment. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(5), 658-698.

Lewis, L., & Patrinos, H. A. (2012). Impact evaluation of private sector participation in education. The World Bank: CfBT Education Trust.

Marks, G. N. (2006). Family Size, Family Type and Student Achievement: Cross-National Differences and the Role of Socioeconomic and School factors. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 37(1), 1-24.

Muralidharan, K., & Kremer, M. (2006). Public and private schools in rural India. Harvard University, Department of Economics, Cambridge, MA.

Muralidharan, K., & Sundararaman, V. (2013). Contract teachers: experimental evidence from India (No. w19440). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Naseer, M. F., M. Patnam and R. Raza. (2010). Transforming public schools: impact of the CRI program on child learning in Pakistan. Economics of Education Review, 29 (2010): 669-683.

Pessoa, A. (2008). Educational Reform in Developing Countries: Private Involvement and Partnerships (No. 284). Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.

Patrinos H. A., Felipe, Barrera-Osorio. Juliana, Guáqueta (2009). The Role and Impact of Public-Private. Partnerships in Education., World Bank, E-Book No. 47949

Pritchett, L. (2013). The Rebirth of Education: Schooling Ain’t Learning, Brookings Institution Press, Columbia, Maryland.

Rosenbaum, P. R., and Rubin, D. B. (1983). The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55.

Rosenbaum, P. R. (2002). Observational Studies. New York, Springer.

Smrečnik, I., Fošnarič, S., & Čagran, B. (2014). Environmental impact on learning outcomes in science education in slovenian primary schools through the analysis of material work conditions. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(4), 535-543.

Tooley, J., and Pauline Dixon (2005). Private Education Is Good for the Poor: A Study of Private Schools Serving the Poor in Low-income Countries. Washington, D.C.: Cato Institute, 2005

UNESCO (2015). Adult and Youth Literacy: National, Regional and Global trends, 1985-2015, Annual Report, Institute of Statistics, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).

Wadhwa, W. (2009). Are private schools really performing better than government schools. Annual Status of Education Report (Rural) New Delhi.