Merkezi Yönetimin Vergi Gelirlerini Yerel Yönetimlere Dağıtımı (Küreyerelleşme)

Kaplanhan, Fatih and Korkut, Cem (2014): Merkezi Yönetimin Vergi Gelirlerini Yerel Yönetimlere Dağıtımı (Küreyerelleşme). Published in: International Conference on Eurasian Economies 2014 - Conference Book (9 October 2014): pp. 717-725.

Abstract

Main questions of this study are “How much autonomy?” and “Has autonomy take to feudalism?” Although the resolution of issue according to effective, efficient, rational and fair principles about the income distribution between the central administration and the municipalities is a precondition of permanent and efficient services of local governments. This study aims to identify regional goverments tasks and improve services of central governments with taxes (VAT) distirbution method. We also aim toincrease taxes that are collected from regional governments with the method of glocalization. In addition, if sharing criteria was different, it would how a change between the years 2003-2011 will be investigated. During the comprehensive analysis of these years with public revenues on the basis of VAT, local government’s expenditure, criteria/data to be applied to the share of public revenues to municipalities whether changing the method financing of municipalities can make local governments more efficient and productive will be explored.In a political structure that municipalities are financed from the center, it is very difficult to find an appropriate combination of equality and justice in the distribution of income. Local governments must have privileges which are proportionate with responsibilities on own mandates and source of income for producing to serve as an effective and efficient local services. The results show that if the central governments give budget to regional government according to taxes that are collected in this region, the productivity of taxation increase and regional government can collect taxes easier.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Disturbition of Tax Revenue of Central Government to Local Governments (Glocalization)
• Language: Turkish
• Keywords: glocalization, tax, municipalities, VAT
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H21 - Efficiency ; Optimal Taxation; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R5 - Regional Government Analysis > R51 - Finance in Urban and Rural Economies

References

Arslan, 1983. “Katma Değer Vergisi ve İlgili Yasa Tasarısının Getirdikleri”, Vergi Dünyası, Ankara.

Aktan, 1989. “Arz Yönlü Vergi Politikasının Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerindeki Etkileri”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, İzmir, p.66.

Aydemir, 2012. “Türkiye’de KDV’nin Değerlendirilmesi ve Efektif KDV”, DPT Yıllık Programlar ve Konjonktür Değerlendirme Genel Müdürlüğü, http://ekutup.dpt.gov.tr/vergi/aydemirb/kdv.html (15.08.2012).

Başaran, 2008. Kent ve Yerel Yönetim, Okutan Yayınları, İstanbul.

Bilici, 2007. “Türk Vergi Sisteminin AB ile Uyumu”

Bozlağan, 1997. Yerel Hizmetlerin Özelleştirilmesi ve Bağcılar Belediyesi Özelleştirme Uygulamaları, Üç-Er Ofset Ltd, İstanbul.

Bülbül, 2011. “Türkiye’de Yerel Yönetimlerin Kamu Kesimi Bütçesi Üzerine Etkileri”, IV. Yerel Yönetimlerin Mali Yönetimi Forumu Bildirileri, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Yayını, Ankara.

Danninger, 2008. “Inflation Smoothing and the Modest Effect of VAT in Germany”, IMF Working Papers, International Monetary Fund, v.08/175, Luzern, p.17.

Fidan, 1997. Belediyelerde İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi, Yayınlanmış Y. Lisans Tezi, Mahalli İdareler Derneği Yayınları, Ankara.

Gurría, 2011. General Government Employment Across Levels of Government, Government at a Glance 2011.

Güngör, 2012. “Katma Değer Vergisi Notları”, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi, İİBF, Maliye Bölümü, Afyon p.1.

Hillman, 2003. Public Finance and Public Policy: Responsibilities and Limitations of Government, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Jenkins, 1998. Tax Reform in Singapore, Harvard University, Boston.

Kestane, 1996. İller Bankası ve Yerel Yönetimlerle İlişkileri, Maliye Bakanlığı Bütçe ve Mali Kontrol Genel Müdürlüğü Araştırma Raporu, Ankara.

McGee, 2008. Taxation and Public Finance in Transition and Developing Economies, Springer, Londra.

OECD, 2011. Kamu Harcamalarının Yönetim Düzeyine göre Dağılımı, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932390576 (12.12.2012).

OECD, 2012. Consumption Tax Trends 2012 VAT/GST and Excise Rates, Trends and Administration Issues: VAT/GST and Excise Rates, Trends and Administration Issues, OECD Publishing, Amsterdam, P.44.

Organ, 2013. “Avrupa Birliği Ortak Katma Değer Vergisinin Temel Özellikleri”, www.sagem.pau.edu.tr/doc/abgs1.docx (15.02.2013)

Rodibaught, 2013. “U.S. Master Tax Guide”, CCH Tax Law Editors, Chicago.

Saraçoğlu, 2006. “Katma Değer Vergisinde Oransal Yapı Ve Vergi Oranlarında Yapılan Değişikliklerin Tüketim ve Tasarruflar Üzerindeki Etkileri”, Sayıştay Dergisi, Ankara.

Schneider, 2011. Handbook on the Shadow Economy, Edward Elgar Publishing, Washington D.C.

Schneider, 2013. The Shadow Economy: An International Survey, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Werner, 2003. “Tax Morale and (De-) Centralization- An Experimental Study”, Max Planck Institute for Research into Economic Systems, Jena, Germany.