Buettner, Thomas and Federico, Giulio and Lorincz, Szabolcs (2016): The Use of Quantitative Economic Techniques in EU Merger Control. Published in: Antitrust Magazine , Vol. 31, No. 1 (December 2016): pp. 68-75.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_76384.pdf Download (354kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In some recent merger cases the European Commission has relied on quantitative economic techniques in the competitive assessment of horizontal mergers. These techniques have ranged from the use of merger simulation models (for both differentiated and homogenous goods), to the deployment of direct estimation methods to study the effects of relevant events in the past. This article describes the appropriate use of these quantitative techniques, and it explains the rationale for the reliance on these methods. It also explains why the evidence from economic modelling is complementary to more traditional qualitative evidence on the expected impact of horizontal mergers.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Use of Quantitative Economic Techniques in EU Merger Control |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | European Commission, merger control, quantitative methods |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C21 - Cross-Sectional Models ; Spatial Models ; Treatment Effect Models ; Quantile Regressions C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C63 - Computational Techniques ; Simulation Modeling L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets L - Industrial Organization > L4 - Antitrust Issues and Policies |
Item ID: | 76384 |
Depositing User: | Szabolcs Lorincz |
Date Deposited: | 25 Jan 2017 13:45 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 04:18 |
References: | Aguzzoni, L., B. Buehler, L. Di Martile, G. Ecker, R. Kemp, A. Schwarz, and R. Stil (2015), "Ex-post analysis of two mobile telecom mergers: T-Mobiletele.ring in Austria and T-MobileOrange in the Netherlands", joint work of the Commission, the Austrian Regulatory Authority for Broadcasting and Telecommunications (RTR), and the Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM), http://ec.europa.eu/competition/publications/reports/kd0215836enn.pdf. Amelio, A., A. Cilea, and M. Kadar (2015), "INEOS / Solvay / JV: Yet another P(ractically) V(ery) C(omplex) merger", Competition Merger Brief, 2/2015, Article 2, http://ec.europa.eu/competition/publications/cmb/2015/cmb2015_002_en.pdf. Angrist, J. D., and J-S. Pischke (2010), "The Credibility Revolution in Empirical Economics How Better Research Design is Taking the Con out of Econometrics", The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 3-30. Ashenfelter, O., and D. Hosken (2010), "The effect of mergers on consumer prices: Evidence from five selected case studies", Journal of Law and Economics, 53(3), pp. 417–466. Besen, S., S. Kletter, S. Moresi, S. Salop, and J. Woodbury (2013), "An Economic Analysis of the AT&T-T-Mobile USA Wireless Merger", Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 9(1), pp. 23–47. Buehler, B., and G. Federico (2016), "Recent developments in the assessment of efficiencies of EU mergers", Competition Law & Policy Debate, Volume 2(1). Buehler, B., G. Koltay, X. Boutin, and M. Motta (2014), "Recent Developments at DG Competition: 2013 – 2014", Review of Industrial Organization, Volume 45(4), pp. 399-415. Buettner, T. (forthcoming), "Closeness of competition from an economic perspective", Journal of European Competition Law and Practice. Buettner, T., A. Cilea, and M. Kadar (2016), "Horizontal Mergers in Homogeneous Goods Industries: When Is Spare Capacity Sufficient to Offset Unilateral Effects?", World Competition, Volume 39(1), pp. 57-65. Buettner, T., G. Federico, K-U. Kühn, and D. Magos (2013), "Economic Analysis at the European Commission 2012 – 2013", Review of Industrial Organization, Volume 43(4), pp. 265-290. Di Martile, L., S. Lorincz, J-C. Mauger, M. Sibila, and K. Tosza (2015), "Some like it hot! – coffee merger between DEMB and Mondelēz", Competition Merger Brief, 2/2015, Article 4, http://ec.europa.eu/competition/publications/cmb/2015/cmb2015_002_en.pdf. European Commission (2004), "Guidelines on the assessment of horizontal mergers under the Council Regulation on the control of concentrations between undertakings", http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52004XC0205(02)&from=EN. Farrell, J., and C. Shapiro (2010), "Antitrust Evaluation of Horizontal Mergers: An Economic Alternative to Market Definition", The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics: Vol. 10: Iss. 1 (Policies and perspectives), Article 9. Federico, G., M. Motta, and P. Papandropoulos (2015), "Recent Developments at DG Competition: 2014", Review of Industrial Organization, Volume 47(3), pp. 1-25. Imbens, G. M., and J. M. Wooldridge (2009), "Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation", Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 5-86. Nevo, A. , and M. D. Whinston (2010), "Taking the Dogma out of Econometrics: Structural Modeling and Credible Inference", The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 69-81. OECD (2011), "Economic Evidence in Merger Analysis", OECD Policy Roundtables, DAF/COMP(2011), http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/EconomicEvidenceInMergerAnalysis2011.pdf. U.S. Department of Justice & Federal Trade Commission (2010), "Horizontal Merger Guidelines" (2010), http://ftc.gov/os/2010/08/100819hmg.pdf. Weyl, E. G., and M. Fabinger (2013), "Pass-Through as an Economic Tool: Principles of Incidence under Imperfect Competition", Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 121, No. 3, pp. 528-583. Willig, R. (2011), "Unilateral Competitive Effects of Mergers: Upward Pricing Pressure, Product Quality, and Other Extensions", Review of Industrial Organization, 39, pp. 19-38. Whinston, M. (2015), "GE-Electrolux merger analysis", available at: https://www.justice.gov/atr/file/ge-px02015/download. Wolfers, J. (2006), "Did Unilateral Divorce Laws Raise Divorce Rates? A Reconciliation and New Results", The American Economic Review, Vol. 96, No. 5, pp. 1802-1820. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/76384 |