Widodo, Tri (2008): “Products Mapping” and Dynamic Shift in the Patterns of Comparative Advantage: Could India catch up China? Published in: HUE Journal of Economics and Business , Vol. 31, No. 2 (30 September 2008): pp. 51-78.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_78171.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Abstract This paper aims to examine shifts in the level of comparative advantage in China and India for the period 1988-2003. Products are defined in the 3-digit level of the Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) Revision 2. This paper applies Revealed Symmetric Comparative Advantages (RSCA) index, Trade Balance Index (TBI), an econometric model and the Spearman’s rank correlation. Some conclusions are withdrawn. First, China and India had biggest changes in their comparative advantages in the periods 1988-1993 and 1998-2003, respectively. Second China and India showed despecialization. The change in comparative advantage of China was more dynamic than that of India. Third, in term of the patterns of comparative advantage, India is a follower (if it is not called as a ‘competitor’) of China.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | “Products Mapping” and Dynamic Shift in the Patterns of Comparative Advantage: Could India catch up China? |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Dynamic Specialization, Convergence in Trade Patterns |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F10 - General F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F14 - Empirical Studies of Trade F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F17 - Trade Forecasting and Simulation |
Item ID: | 78171 |
Depositing User: | Tri Widodo |
Date Deposited: | 07 Apr 2017 13:07 |
Last Modified: | 02 Oct 2019 01:17 |
References: | Aksoy, M.A., & Ettori, F.M., 1992. ’Protection and industrial structure in India’. Policy Research Working Paper. The World Bank. Balassa, B., 1965. ‘Trade liberalization and ‘revealed’ comparative advantage’, The Manchester School of Economics and Social Studies, Vol. 33, pp. 99-123. Bloom, David, E., Caning, David, Hu, Linlin, Liu, Yuanli, Mahal, Ajay, and Yip, Winnie (2006), Why has China’s economy taken off faster than India’s. Paper presented at the 2006 PAN Asia Conference, Stanford University. Das, D.K., 2006. China and India: A tale of two economies. Routledge, New York. Fan, G., and X. Zhan, 2003.’The Chinese reform agenda’. In Jost, J.T. (ed.), China’s Role in Asia and the World Economy. Forum and Debt and Development (FONDAD). Gujarati, D., 2000. Basic Econometric. McGraw Hill. New York. Lardy, N., 2002. Integrating China into the Global Economy. Washington, D.C., Brookings Institution Press. Laursen, K., 1998. ‘Revealed comparative advantage and the alternatives as measures of international specialization’. DRUID Working Paper. No 98-30. Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics (DRUID). Panagariya, Arvind, 2006. ‘India and China: trade and foreign investment’. Paper Presented at ‘Pan Asia 2006’ Conference, Stanford Center for International Development, http://scid.stanford.edu/events/PanAsia/Papers/Panagariya.pdf (accessed January 2007) Srinivasan, T.N., 2006. ‘China, India and the world economy’. Working Paper No. 286. Stanford Center for International Development. July. [online; cited 5 November 2006]. Available from URL: http://scid.stanford.edu/pdf/SCID286.pdf. United Nations, 1988, 1993, 1988, 2004. International Trade Statistics Yearbook. The United Nations Publsihing Section, New York. United Nations, 2006. United Nation Commodity Trade Statistics Database. [online; cited 5 November 2006]. Available from URL:http://comtrade.un.org/db/default.aspx United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), 2005. Trade and Development Report 2005, New York and Geneva. Vollrath, T.L., 1991. ‘A theoretical evaluation of alternative trade intensity measures of revealed comparative advantage’. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 127, 265-280. Woo, W.T., 2003. ‘Challenges in macroeconomic management for China’s new leader’. In Jost, J.T. (ed.), China’s Role in Asia and the World Economy. Forum and Debt and Development (FONDAD). World Bank, 2006. World Development Indicators. Washington D.C., World Bank. World Trade Organization, 2005. International Trade Statistic, 2005. Geneva, World Trade Organization. Wörz, J., 2005. Dynamic of trade specialization in developed and less developed countries. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 41(3), 92-22. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/78171 |